<https://www.therightreasons.net/topic/98254-nyt-durham-will-ask-grand-jury-to-indict-prominent-dem-connected-attorney/page/2/#comment-628059>
<http://schema.org/text>
"Sussman Case Is Tip of the Iceberg in Gvt. Plot to Frame Me - Roger Stone\n \n\n\n\tUnderstanding the possible implications of Special Counsel John Durham's recent indictment of prominent Democratic lawyer and Perkins Coie partner Michael Sussmann requires a refresher course on one of the most notorious examples of mass hypnosis in American history.\n \n\n\n\tPerkins Coie is the international law firm based in Seattle that represented Hillary Clinton during the 2016 campaign. Sussmann was recently indicted by a federal grand jury on evidence provided by Durham. The charge is  lying to the FBI in an effort to mislead investigators regarding supposed transactions between The Trump Organization and a Russian bank. The allegations later proved to be false. \n \n\n\n\tIt now appears that Jake Sullivan, a longtime Clinton aide who now serves as White House national security adviser, also lied to FBI agents regarding the dirty trick in which Sullivan, Sussmann and others essentially fabricated the \"communications\" between the Russian bank and Donald Trump entities.\n \n\n\n\tWhen, may I ask, will 29 heavily armed FBI agents converge on Jake Sullivan's home in the predawn hours in order to take him into custody? That’s what happened to me. Or perhaps the FBI will invite OAN to film this exclusive takedown – as  the FBI allowed CNN to do when I was arrested. Don't hold your breath.\n \n\n\n\tThe U.S. Justice Department, Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Office, and their willing handmaidens in the establishment media have all insisted, as a pretext for their investigation of so-called \"Russian collusion,\" that the Democratic National Committee was the target of an online hack by Russian intelligence with the stolen emails being supplied to WikiLeaks for publication. :snip:\n \n"
<https://www.therightreasons.net/topic/98254-nyt-durham-will-ask-grand-jury-to-indict-prominent-dem-connected-attorney/page/2/?tab=comments#comment-628059>