<https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/55707-restored/page/3/#comment-6278803>
<http://schema.org/text>
"But the house was always a one bedroom. The new design made the design much more functional in my opinion for the target market. I am not sure how converting that awful space on the front porch into a nook off the bedroom decreased value.\n \n\n\n\tIt is not as if Brett took away a bedroom and made a larger one bedroom or stole space so that there would be a master bath or whatever. At a certain point you can't enlarge what is there. How would you suggest a second bedroom be added that wouldn't detract from the aesthetics and functionality of the house. \n \n\n\n\tSuch a small house is obviously not for everyone but it would appeal to single people or even a couple who preferred a single family home to a condo. \n \n\n\n\tThe renovation didn't negatively impact resale value - the actual size of the home meant that it was always going to appeal to a smaller segment of the market. But within that market, a beautifully restored Victorian cottage would be more appealing than the equivalent square footage for a condo.\n "
<https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/55707-restored/page/3/?tab=comments#comment-6380752>