<https://www.neogaf.com/threads/insomniac-is-being-coronated-way-to-soon.1618405/>
<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Lately I have been seeing alot of people calling insomniac Sonys \"premier studio\" in combination with their output and their quality...but I think this is being a bit short sighted considering the quality and proven studios Sony has under their belts.\n\nI would say that the premier studios who could be considered their top dog are:\n\nNaughty Dog\nInsomniac\nSanta Monica\nSucker Punch\n\nYou could throw guerrilla in there but I would argue that is a bit short sighted too. Now the talk on Insomniac being the premier studio started with Spiderman and since they made Spiderman Miles Morales and Ratchet and clank rift apart...these three games have an average meta critic of 86.6. Now the studio who I would still consider the best of the SIE first party Naughty Dogs last 3 games have a metacritic of 90 even with lost legacy bringing them down with an 84 average...but it seems that since Naughty dog doesnt have the output of insomniac I would argue due to the fact that naughty dogs polish is still a tier above the rest of the industry it feels people are wrongly putting them over naughty dog even tho their projects are still a step below Naughty Dogs.\n\nWhile they have been killing it with output and really well recieved games, it does feel like their tremendous climb to the top (no pun intended) has a large part to do with the massive IP they are in charge of as I would argue they haven't produced a game that is even the level of Ghost of Tsushima  and still feel that putting them at the top of the SIE pyramid is a bit too soon. I would probably put them third behind:\n\n1. Naughty Dog\n2. Santa Monica\n3. Insomniac\n\nBut with GOT being better than probably any Insomniac game imo they could climb to 3 if their next game is of the same quality. \n\nTLDR: Why people looking past my boy naughty dog"
<https://neogaf.com/threads/insomniac-is-being-coronated-way-to-soon.1618405/>