_:nedb54d112580484a8411e777f66199a3xb0
<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"<img src=\"/sites/dh/files/article_images/2009/09/14/pano-green-revolution.jpg\" alt=\"Recognition: Former US President George W Bush with Norman Borlaug during a ceremony where Borlaug was awarded the congressional gold medal for his work in agriculture in Washington on July 17, 2007. NYT\" width=\"250\" height=\"158\" align=\"left\" data-original=\"/http://www.deccanherald.com/images/editor_images/pano-green-revolution.jpg\"><p>He was 95. Borlaug’s advances in plant breeding led to spectacular success in increasing food production in Latin America and Asia and brought him international acclaim. In 1970, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.<br/><br/>He was widely described as the father of the broad agricultural movement called the Green Revolution, though decidedly reluctant to accept the title. “A miserable term,” he said, characteristically shrugging off any air of self-importance.<br/><br/>Yet his work had a far-reaching impact on the lives of millions of people in developing countries. His breeding of high-yielding crop varieties helped to avert mass famines that were widely predicted in the 1960s, altering the course of history. Largely because of his work, countries that had been food deficient, like Mexico and India, became self-sufficient in producing cereal grains.<br/><br/>“More than any other single person of this age, he has helped provide bread for a hungry world,” the Nobel committee said in presenting him with the Peace Prize. “We have made this choice in the hope that providing bread will also give the world peace.”<br/><br/>The day the award was announced, Borlaug, vigorous and slender at 56, was working in a wheat field outside Mexico City when his wife, Margaret, drove up to tell him the news. “Someone’s pulling your leg,” he replied, according to one of his biographers, Leon Hesser. Assured that it was true, he kept on working, saying he would celebrate later. <br/>The Green Revolution eventually came under attack from environmental and social critics who said it had created more difficulties than it had solved. Borlaug responded that the real problem was not his agricultural techniques, but the runaway population growth that had made them necessary. <br/><br/>“If the world population continues to increase at the same rate, we will destroy the species,” he declared.<br/><br/>Predictions<br/>Travelling to Norway, the land of his ancestors, to receive the award, he warned the Nobel audience that the struggle against hunger had not been won. “We may be at high tide now, but ebb tide could soon set in if we become complacent and relax our efforts,” he said. Twice more in his lifetime, in the 1970s and again in 2008, those words would prove prescient as food shortages and high prices caused global unrest.<br/><br/>His Nobel Prize was the culmination of a storied life in agriculture that began when he was a boy growing up on a farm in Iowa, wondering why plants grew better in some places than others. His was also an unlikely career path, one that began in earnest near the end of World War II, when Borlaug walked away from a promising job at DuPont, the chemical company, to take a position in Mexico trying to help farmers improve their crops.<br/><br/>He spent countless hours hunched over in the blazing Mexican sun as he manipulated tiny wheat blossoms to cross different strains. To speed the work, he set up winter and summer operations in far-flung parts of Mexico, logging thousands of miles over poor roads. He battled illness, forded rivers in flood, dodged mudslides and sometimes slept in tents.<br/><br/>Norman Ernest Borlaug was born on March 25, 1914, in his grandfather’s farmhouse near the tiny settlement of Saude, in Iowa. Growing up in a stalwart community of Norwegian immigrants, he trudged across snow-covered fields to a one-room country school, coming home almost every day to the aroma of bread baking in his mother’s oven.<br/><br/>By the late 1940s, researchers knew they could induce huge yield gains in wheat by feeding the plants chemical fertiliser that supplied them with extra nitrogen, a shortage of which was the biggest constraint on plant growth. But the strategy had a severe limitation: Beyond a certain level of fertiliser, the seed heads containing wheat grains would grow so large and heavy, the plant would fall over, ruining the crop.<br/><br/>In 1953, Borlaug began working with a wheat strain containing an unusual gene. It had the effect of shrinking the wheat plant, creating a stubby, compact variety. Yet crucially, the seed heads did not shrink, meaning a small plant could still produce a large amount of wheat.<br/><br/>Borlaug and his team transferred the gene into tropical wheats. When high fertiliser levels were applied to these new ‘semidwarf’ plants, the results were nothing short of astonishing.<br/><br/>The plants would produce enormous heads of grain, yet their stiff, short bodies could support the weight without falling over. On the same amount of land, wheat output could be tripled or quadrupled. Later, the idea was applied to rice, the staple crop for nearly half the world’s population, with yields jumping several-fold compared with some traditional varieties.<br/><br/>This strange principle of increasing yields by shrinking plants was the central insight of the Green Revolution, and its impact was enormous. By the early 1960s, many farmers in Mexico had embraced the full package of innovations from Borlaug’s breeding programme, and wheat output in the country had soared sixfold from the levels of the early 1940s.<br/><br/>A boon<br/>Urgent queries began to pour in from other poor countries, for they were caught in a bind. After World War II, the introduction of basic sanitation in many developing countries caused death rates to plunge, but birth rates were slow to follow. As a result, the global population had exploded, putting immense strain on food supplies.<br/><br/>On the Indian subcontinent in particular, a crisis developed. The population was growing so much faster than farm output that it was not clear how the masses could be fed. In the mid-1960s, huge grain imports were required to avert starvation.<br/><br/>At the invitation of the Indian and Pakistani governments, Borlaug offered his advice. He met resistance at first from senior agricultural experts steeped in tradition, but as the food situation worsened, the objections faded. Soon, India and Pakistan were ordering shiploads of Borlaug’s wheat seeds from Mexico.<br/><br/>Indian and Pakistani farmers took up the new varieties, receiving fertiliser and other aid from their governments. Just as in Mexico, harvests soared: The Indian wheat crop of 1968 was so bountiful that the government had to turn schools into temporary granaries.<br/>As with the Mexican effort, the Rockefeller Foundation and other donors set up a project in the Philippines to work on rice. It led to the creation of semidwarf varieties that also caused rice yields to soar. Chinese scientists ultimately followed in the footsteps of Western researchers, using semidwarf varieties to establish food security in China and setting the stage for its rise as an industrial power. And Borlaug and his colleagues helped spread the new crop varieties to additional countries of Latin America, notably Colombia, Ecuador, Chile and Brazil.<br/><br/>Borlaug’s later years were partly occupied by arguments over the social and environmental consequences of the revolution. Many critics on the Left attacked it, saying it displaced smaller farmers, encouraged overreliance on chemicals and paved the way for greater corporate control of agriculture. In a characteristic complaint, Vandana Shiva, an Indian critic, wrote in 1991 that “in perceiving nature’s limits as constraints on productivity that had to be removed, American experts spread ecologically destructive and unsustainable practices worldwide.”<br/><br/>Borlaug declared that such arguments often came from ‘elitists’ who were rich enough not to worry about where their next meal was coming from. But over time, he <br/>acknowledged the validity of some environmental concerns, and embraced more judicious use of fertilisers and pesticides. He was frustrated throughout his life that governments did not do more to tackle what he called ‘the population monster’ by lowering birth rates.<br/><br/>The New York Times<br/></p></img>"
<https://www.deccanherald.com/content/25175/food-grain-guru-helped-conquer.html>