<https://forum.adaware.com/index.php?/topic/28600-is-there-a-fix-for-82/#comment-117959>
<http://schema.org/text>
"[quote name='cressy' post='117950' date='Mar 13 2010, 03:10 PM']From looking at the blog you linked to visitor, which is dated feb19th, it looks like they think it is fixed.  Are they still working on a fix? I don't know, it doesn't seem like it or we would have one by now. It has been a few weeks now.[/quote] \nThe blog announced the first fix, but we've been reporting bugs since then.  So as long as Lavasoft is reading our info, they should still be working on it.  \n[quote name='cressy' post='117950' date='Mar 13 2010, 03:10 PM']And the new version 8.2;   In my opinion I think lavasoft is trying to do more than any of us want. Most everyone already have anti-virus software installed which leads to conflicts with more than one program trying to do the same job.[/quote] \nAd-Aware doing too much really only holds true for free users who want a stand-alone scanner like the old SE version.  For paying customers, Lavasoft has gone to marketing a \"security suite\" similar to their competitors.  I guess the surveys must show that if users are going to pay for software, they want it to do it all.  It also has to do with how tech savvy the users are.  Tech savvy users are more likely to have several different programs installed, whereas the average user wants simplicity - as shown by Ad-Aware's addition of \"simple mode.\"  \nAnti-virus and File Protection are features of the paid Plus and Pro versions, so really the Free version is just a malware scanner.  Unfortunately, the software is the same, with the serial just unlocking the extra features.  The solution would be to develop a separate, simpler utility for the Free version - something that Casey has suggested. "
<https://forum.adaware.com/index.php?/topic/28600-is-there-a-fix-for-82/>