<https://forum.adaware.com/index.php?/topic/28600-is-there-a-fix-for-82/#comment-117981>
<http://schema.org/text>
"[quote name='visitor' post='117959' date='Mar 13 2010, 10:08 PM']The blog announced the first fix, but we've been reporting bugs since then.  So as long as Lavasoft is reading our info, they should still be working on it. \nAd-Aware doing too much really only holds true for free users who want a stand-alone scanner like the old SE version.  For paying customers, Lavasoft has gone to marketing a \"security suite\" similar to their competitors.  I guess the surveys must show that if users are going to pay for software, they want it to do it all.  It also has to do with how tech savvy the users are.  Tech savvy users are more likely to have several different programs installed, whereas the average user wants simplicity - as shown by Ad-Aware's addition of \"simple mode.\"  \nAnti-virus and File Protection are features of the paid Plus and Pro versions, so really the Free version is just a malware scanner.  Unfortunately, the software is the same, with the serial just unlockinddg the extra features.  The solution would be to develop a separate, simpler utility for the Free version - something that Casey has suggested.[/quote]  \nWhile many of us have been loyal Ad-aware users (free &amp; paid) have been patient, only wanting a resolution sometime soon, its understandable that others have posted their anger &amp; frustration--some will never come back. However, I wanted to add that I appreciate Visitor &amp; Casey having to be 'in the middle,' trying to help us--at least answering our concerns--while trying to let Lavasoft know what we think &amp; feel about this. So thanks guys. I know you'd be as pleased as any of us to get this resolved. \nAl "
<https://forum.adaware.com/index.php?/topic/28600-is-there-a-fix-for-82/>