<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ranking college football players is an inherently dangerous task. With the number of different ways a player can contribute\u2014quantitative ways like sacks, yards and interceptions or qualitative ways like sound blocking and tight coverage\u2014it\u2019s difficult to gage who makes the most impact. On top of that, with players limited to four-year careers, there\u2019s a significant amount of guesswork to assess how players will develop from one season to the next.\r\n\r\n&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, with those acknowledged limitations, SI.com\u2019s college football staff presents its top 100 players for the 2016 season. We are revealing 10 players per day and began with Nos. 100\u201391, 90\u201381, 80\u201371, 70\u201361, 60\u201351, 50\u201341, 40\u201331 and 30\u201321. Here are our 20th through 11th ranked players.\r\n\r\n&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These rankings are not just an assessment of what the players have done so far but how they\u2019ll perform this fall. And rather than simply rank players by their expected production, we attempt to discern who is the most valuable. Essentially, if you were starting a team from scratch, whom would you want the most?\r\n&lt;/p&gt;"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/07/08/college-football-top-players-ranking-2016-20>