<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"The Barbour jacket, a wad-canvas, corduroy-collar repeller of rain, mist and dank chill with a snug tartan cotton lining, is standard issue among my people, we who live in those hyperborean climes warmed by the long-traveled Gulf Stream to a clime ever cool. Among our people, there are men and there are boys. Dress distinctions are few, although men wear hats and generally eschew short pants. It is entirely appropriate for men and boys to wear Barbours or their equivalents (I wear an Irish version of this fine British product, saving a few quid) when pursuing salmon, cutting peat, cudgeling swine or engaging in other manly alfresco activities. Age is not an issue. If, however, you are a macaroon boy decorating the cash register of a high-street boutique, you might shun the old Barbour in favor of something more likely to be obsolete in a matter of months, in the name of faux style progress. Even then you might be in error, what with Burberry, Holland &amp;amp; Holland, Abercrombie and now the venerable Barbour becoming houses of fashion. We seem to be entering a sensible craze! I think what your friend meant is that to wear a Barbour is a manly thing sure to distance one from the poncy frivolities of planned frockster obsolescence."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.gq.com/story/barbour-coat>