<http://schema.org/articleBody>
" This is the second response offered in this thread, implying that a result set that is made distinct across some subset of columns which is then joined to the original full\non-distinct TABLE [as result set] on those same columns [although the quoted example removed one column for join-on] somehow will also become distinct.? create table qtemp/dups (r char, d char, g char, x char) ; insert into qtemp/dups values (0, 0, 0, 1), (0, 0, 0, 2), (0, 0, 0, 3) /* (0,0,0) */ , (1, 1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 1, 2), (1, 1, 1, ..."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201212/msg00308.html>