<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"                      <p class=\"imgtitle\">Harron</p>           WHEELING, W.V. &ndash; Radiologist Ray Harron of Bridgeport refuses to testify about X-rays he read twice with different results, according to railroad company CSX Transportation.<br /> <br /> CSX, seeking damages from Harron and others for the costs of asbestos litigation, wants U.S. District Judge Frederick Stamp to require Harron to explain his reversals.<br />  <br />Harron's lawyers wouldn't let him explain at a March 11 deposition, CSX lawyer Marc Williams of Huntington wrote in an April 10 motion to compel answers.<br />  <br />Harron's reversals from reports finding asbestosis to reports finding silicosis are clearly relevant, Williams argued.<br />  <br />They tend to show that Harron found what lawyers paid him to find, he wrote.<br />  <br />They constitute circumstantial evidence of conspiracy, he wrote.<br />  <br />Stamp set a hearing May 4.<br />  <br />CSX sued Harron and the Pittsburgh law firm of Peirce, Raimond and Coulter in 2005, after U.S. District Judge Janis Jack of Texas exposed fabrication of X-ray reports.<br />  <br />Stamp ruled that CSX could conduct discovery on Harron in connection with a suit the Peirce firm filed for former CSX employee Earl Baylor.<br />  <br />Although Harron kept his mouth shut about reversals at his deposition, he opened it when someone mentioned Jack.<br />  <br />\"I am not here to pick a fight with Judge Jack,\" he said.<br />  <br />\"I am here to talk about Mr. Baylor,\" he said.<br /> <br /> A day before Williams filed the motion the Peirce firm opposed summary judgment on a claim that two clients switched bodies at an X-ray screening session.<br />   <br />The firm's lawyer, Walter DeForest of Pittsburgh, argued that if the clients committed fraud the firm didn't know about it."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://madisonrecord.com/stories/510566513-radiologist-harron-is-quiet-on-x-ray-results>