<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"\n\tAdvertisement - Continue Reading Below\n\t\n\nTIME magazine will, on occasion, print different covers for its international editions from what it does in the U.S. This is often to pique American readers' interest with more U.S.-centric stories\u2014 once the magazine even subbed out a Queen Elizabeth cover story for one on Mitt Romney. Rarely is this noticed; rarely is this controversial. But then the magazine's never played with the fiery fangirl culture that is the \"Cumberbitches,\" fervent supporters of British actor Benedict Cumberbatch.\n\nA crisp black and white Cumberbatch portrait features on the front of all TIME's international issues, promising an in-depth profile of the quintessentially British and irritatingly self-deprecatory actor. American readers, however, get a cover story about Texas. (The Cumberbatch feature is still in the issue, but not cover-worthy.) And Cumberbatch fans are complaining, virulently. The magazine has collected together a selection of the craziest tweets they received in response to the snub, which range from the sublime to the ridiculous. Mainly the ridiculous, though. One fan even baked special \"cumbercupcakes\" which I think says it all.Am I missing out by not jumping on the Cumberbatch bandwagon? I mean, I'd eat the cupcake, but that's about all. And only if it's not red velvet.Photo Credit: TIME "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/news/a16046/benny-time/>