<http://www.w3.org/2009/08/skos-reference/skos.html#note>
"Open research data Heather\u00A0Piwowar  DataONE\u00A0postdoc\u00A0with\u00A0Dryad\u00A0and\u00A0NESCent,\u00A0UBC @researchremix OA\u00A0week\u00A02010 University\u00A0of\u00A0British\u00A0Columbia  \u000C#1 It matters  \u000Chttp://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ho/09/euwf/ho_24.45.1.htm  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/jsmjr/62443357/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/camilleharrington/3587294608/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/rkuhnau/3318245976/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/conformpdx/1796399674/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/rkuhnau/3317418699/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/zemlinki/261617721/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/tracenmatt/3020786491/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/the-o/2078239333/  \u000C\u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/75166820@N00/5318468/  \u000C#2 Wayfinding + progress  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/paulhami/1020538523//  \u000CWhich data?  http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulhami/1020538523//  \u000CWhere?  http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulhami/1020538523//  \u000CWith whom?  http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulhami/1020538523//  \u000CWhen?  http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulhami/1020538523//  \u000CUnder what terms?  http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulhami/1020538523//  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/paulhami/1020538523//  \u000CFind Organize Document Deidentify Format Ask Submit Answer questions Worry about mistakes being found Worry about data being misinterpreted Worry about being scooped Forgo money and IP and prestige???  \u000Cnot very motivating.  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/johnnyvulkan/381941233/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonivc/2283676770/  \u000Ca) policies + expectations - NSF - Joint Data Archiving Policy - BioMed Central - PLoS  \u000Cb) repositories  - datatype-based - institution-based - discipline-based - journal-based  \u000Cc) standards  - data licenses - data citation - IDs for datasets, people, entities  \u000Cd) part of something bigger - open government data - citizen science - supplemental materials - dataset-based usage metrics - awards, recognition  \u000C#3 Is it working?  \u000Clots of data sharing!  http://www.genome.jp/en/db_growth.html  \u000Cbut\u00A0how\u00A0much\u00A0isn\u2019t\u00A0 shared? what\u00A0isn\u2019t\u00A0shared? why\u00A0not?  who\u00A0isn\u2019t\u00A0sharing\u00A0it?  how\u00A0much\u00A0does\u00A0it\u00A0matter? what\u00A0can\u00A0we\u00A0do\u00A0 about\u00A0it?  \u000Cyou can not manage what you do not measure  quote: Lord Kelvin http://www.flickr.com/photos/archeon/2941655917/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanr/142455033/  \u000CWhy is it important? Are we sure?  \u000CErrors. More\u00A0than\u00A0half\u00A0of\u00A0all\u00A0papers\u00A0contain\u00A0errors 5\u201010%\u00A0contain\u00A0errors\u00A0that\u00A0change\u00A0the\u00A0conclusions  Gore et al 1977, Kantoer and Taylor 1994, McGuigan 1995, Hurlbert and White 1993  \u000COk, let\u2019s share on request.  \u000CDoesn\u2019t work self-reported denying a request in last 3 years trainees self-reported denying a request been denied access to data, materials, code authors \u201Cnot able to retrieve raw data\u201D not willing to release data 0%  10%  20%  30%  40%  Campbell et al. JAMA. 2002. Kyzas et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. Vogeli et al. Acad Med. 2006. Reidpath et al. Bioethics 2001.  \u000CDon\u2019t get the email  Evangelou\u00A0et\u00A0al.\u00A0\u00A0FASEB\u00A0J.\u00A0\u00A02006. Wren.\u00A0\u00A0Bioinformatics\u00A02008. Wren\u00A0et\u00A0al.\u00A0\u00A0EMBO\u00A0Rep\u00A02006.  \u000CSay no want to publish more papers first want exclusive use ensure data confidentiality control avoid cost of preparation 0%  10% 20% 30% 40% 50%  Hedstrom. Society of Am Archivists Ann Meeting. 2008.  \u000CAsk why `Before\u00A0I\u00A0send\u00A0you\u00A0the\u00A0data\u00A0could\u00A0I\u00A0ask\u00A0what\u00A0you\u00A0want\u00A0it\u00A0for?' `Can\u00A0you\u00A0be\u00A0more\u00A0explicit,\u00A0please,\u00A0about\u00A0the\u00A0analyses\u00A0you\u00A0have\u00A0in\u00A0 mind\u00A0and\u00A0what\u00A0you\u00A0plan\u00A0to\u00A0do\u00A0with\u00A0them?' `We'll\u00A0have\u00A0to\u00A0discuss\u00A0your\u00A0request\u00A0with\u00A0the\u00A0other\u00A0coauthors.\u00A0\u00A0 Before\u00A0we\u00A0do\u00A0that,\u00A0I'd\u00A0like\u00A0to\u00A0know\u00A0your\u00A0proposed\u00A0analysis\u00A0plan.'\u00A0 `We\u00A0are\u00A0not\u00A0\uFB01nished\u00A0using\u00A0the\u00A0data,\u00A0but\u00A0when\u00A0we\u00A0are\u00A0\uFB01nished\u00A0with\u00A0 it,\u00A0we\u00A0would\u00A0be\u00A0open\u00A0to\u00A0requests\u00A0for\u00A0the\u00A0data.' `Any\u00A0use\u00A0of\u00A0the\u00A0data\u00A0other\u00A0than\u00A0for\u00A0the\u00A0speci\uFB01c\u00A0purpose\u00A0laid\u00A0down\u00A0 in\u00A0the\u00A0contract\u00A0of\u00A0collaboration\u00A0is\u00A0e\uFB00ectively\u00A0ruled\u00A0out.'  Reidpath et al. Bioethics 2001.  \u000CNot efficient.  \u000CNot efficient. Not fair. Not\u00A0random: \u2010\u00A0young \u2010\u00A0productive  Campbell et all 2000  \u000CHas real costs. Survey of doctoral students and postdocs: 28-50% reported withholding negative effects: \u2022 hurt progress of their research, \u2022 hurt rate of discovery in their lab/research group, \u2022 hurt quality of their relationships with academic scientists, \u2022 hurt quality of their education, \u2022 hurt level of communication in their lab/research group. Vogeli et al. Acad Med. 2006 Feb; 81(2):128-36  \u000COk, then on a website? No. Urls stop working.  Evangelou\u00A0et\u00A0al.\u00A0\u00A0FASEB\u00A0J.\u00A0\u00A02006. Wren.\u00A0\u00A0Bioinformatics\u00A02008. Wren\u00A0et\u00A0al.\u00A0\u00A0EMBO\u00A0Rep\u00A02006.  \u000COk, in a repository?  \u000Clots of data sharing!  http://www.genome.jp/en/db_growth.html  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/g_kat26/4255119413/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/jima/606588905/  \u000C\u000CCombined, these full-text portals reach 85% of the articles available through U of Pittsburgh library subscriptions.  \u000Cmicroarray data  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_microarray http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Heatmap.png  http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DNA_double_helix_vertikal.PNG  \u000C\u000C11,603 studies that created gene expression microarray data  \u000CFunder  Journal  Investigator  Institution  Is research data shared after publication?  Study  \u000CFunder  Journal  Investigator  funded by NIH?  impact factor  years since first paper  size of grant  strength of policy  # pubs  sharing plan req\u2019d?  open access?  funded by non-NIH?  number of microarray studies published  # citations previously shared? previously reused? gender  Institution  Study  sector  humans?  size  mice?  impact rank  plants?  country  cancer? clinical trial? number of authors year  \u000Cjournal\u00A0data\u00A0sharing\u00A0policy  \u201CAn inherent principle of publication is that others should be able to replicate and build upon the authors' published claims. Therefore, a condition of publication in a Nature journal is that authors are required to make materials, data and associated protocols available in a publicly accessible database \u2026\u201D  http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/availability.html http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7197/index.html  \u000Cjournal\u00A0rank  \u000Cinstitution\u00A0rank  Yu et al. BMC medical informatics and decision making (2007) vol. 7 pp. 17  \u000Cfunding\u00A0level PubMed grant lists  + NIH grant details  \u000Cstudy\u00A0type  \u000Cauthor\u00A0gender  \u000Cand\u00A0so\u00A0on... 124 variables  \u000C11,603 studies 25% had links from datasets in databases  \u000C0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10  Across\u00A0time  0.05  Proportion of articles with datasets found in GEO or ArrayExpress  Proportion of articles with shared datasets, by year  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  Year article published  2007  2008  2009  \u000CWhat can we do about it?  \u000CWhat can we do about it? Funder policies.  \u000C19%  Piwowar and Chapman. Journal of Informetrics 2010  \u000CWhat can we do about it? Journal policies.  \u000CWe looked at data sharing policies within Instruction to Author statements of 70 journals, as they apply to gene expression microarray data.  Piwowar and Chapman. ELPUB 2008  \u000Cstrength\u00A0of\u00A0data\u00A0sharing\u00A0policies No applicable policy (43%) Weak policy (24%) should, recommend, request must, but without requiring database accession number Strong policy (33%) must, required, condition of publication requires database accession number  \u000CHigh-impact journals tend to have a strong data-sharing policy  \u000CArticles published in journals with a strong data-sharing policy are more likely to have publicly available datasets  \u000CWhat can we do about it? Learn \u2022 Learn from those who do it well \u2022 Focus on places that need it  \u000C0.8  0.6  Physiol Genomics PLoS Genet Genome Biol Microbiology PLoS One BMC Genomics Plant Cell Genome Res Eukaryot Cell Appl Environ Microbiol BMC Med Genomics Hum Mol Genet Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Infect Immun Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Dev Biol J Bacteriol Mol Endocrinol BMC Cancer Plant Physiol Biol Reprod Blood J Immunol FASEB J Toxicol Sci J Exp Bot Nucleic Acids Res Diabetes Mol Cell Biol Mol Cancer Ther BMC Bioinformatics Stem Cells FEBS Lett J Neurosci Am J Pathol J Biol Chem J Virol OTHER Cancer Res J Clin Endocrinol Metab Plant Mol Biol Clin Cancer Res Genomics Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Mol Hum Reprod Carcinogenesis Gene Endocrinology Oncogene Cancer Lett Biochem Biophys Res Commun  Proportion of datasets shared 1.0  Journals  (Physiological\u00A0Genomics)  0.4  0.2  0.0  \u000CTokyo Daigaku  National Cancer Institute  Michigan State University  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor  University of California, Berkeley  University of Toronto  Washington University in Saint Louis  University of Pittsburgh  Johns Hopkins University  0.6  Yale University  0.8  Duke University Medical Center  Harvard University  Max Planck Gesellschaft  OTHER  Baylor College of Medicine  University of Minnesota, Twin Cities  University of California, San Diego  University of Florida  University of California, San Francisco  The University of British Columbia  University of California, Davis  University of Washington  University of Wisconsin, Madison  University of California, Los Angeles  University of Illinois  University of Pennsylvania  Stanford University  Proportion of datasets shared 1.0  Institutions  (Stanford)  0.4  0.2  0.0  \u000C1901  1801  1701  1601  1501  1401  1301  1201  1101  0.8  1001  901  801  701  601  501  401  301  201  101  1  Proportion of datasets shared 1.0  Institution rank  0.6  0.4  0.2  0.0  \u000CMultivariate nonlinear regressions with interactions Odds Ratio 0.25  0.50  1.00  2.00  Has journal policy  0.50  1.00  2.00  0.95  Count of 0.25 Authors prev GEOAE sharing &amp; OA &amp; microarray creation Has journal policy NO KCount funding or P of R01 &amp; other NIHfunding grants Authors prev GEOAE sharing &amp; OA &amp; microarray creation impact NO K Journal funding or P funding Institution high citations &amp; collaboration Journal policy consequences &amp; Journal longimpact halflife Journal policy consequences &amp; long halflife Institution high citations NOT &amp; collaboration animals or mice Instititution is government &amp; NOT higher ed Last authorNOT num prevanimals pubs &amp; first year orpub mice Large NIH grant Humans &amp; cancer ed Instititution is government &amp; NOT higher NO geo reuse + YES high institution output authorpubs num prev&amp; pubs &amp; firstyear year pubpub Last author numFirstprev first Large NIH grant Humans &amp; cancer NO geo reuse + YES high institution output First author num prev pubs &amp; first year pub  0.95  Multivariate nonlinear regressions with interactions Odds Ratio R01 &amp; other NIH grants 4.00  8.00  4.00  8.00  \u000CMultivariate nonlinear regressions with interactions Odds Ratio 0.25  0.50  1.00  2.00  Has journal policy  0.50  1.00  2.00  0.95  Count of 0.25 Authors prev GEOAE sharing &amp; OA &amp; microarray creation Has journal policy NO KCount funding or P of R01 &amp; other NIHfunding grants Authors prev GEOAE sharing &amp; OA &amp; microarray creation impact NO K Journal funding or P funding Institution high citations &amp; collaboration Journal policy consequences &amp; Journal longimpact halflife Journal policy consequences &amp; long halflife Institution high citations NOT &amp; collaboration animals or mice Instititution is government &amp; NOT higher ed Last authorNOT num prevanimals pubs &amp; first year orpub mice Large NIH grant Humans &amp; cancer ed Instititution is government &amp; NOT higher NO geo reuse + YES high institution output authorpubs num prev&amp; pubs &amp; firstyear year pubpub Last author numFirstprev first Large NIH grant Humans &amp; cancer NO geo reuse + YES high institution output First author num prev pubs &amp; first year pub  0.95  Multivariate nonlinear regressions with interactions Odds Ratio R01 &amp; other NIH grants 4.00  8.00  4.00  8.00  \u000CMultivariate nonlinear regression with interactions Odds Ratio 0.25  0.50  1.00  Amount of NIH funding Journal impact factor and policy Higher Ed in USA Cancer &amp; humans  0.95  OA journal &amp; previous GEO-AE sharing  2.00  4.00  \u000CMultivariate nonlinear regression with interactions Odds Ratio 0.25  0.50  1.00  Amount of NIH funding Journal impact factor and policy Higher Ed in USA Cancer &amp; humans  0.95  OA journal &amp; previous GEO-AE sharing  2.00  4.00  \u000CCarrot?  http://www.flickr.com/photos/sunrise/35819369/  \u000Ccurrency\u00A0of\u00A0value? Citations.  \u000Ccurrency\u00A0of\u00A0value? Citations. $50!  Diamond,Arthur M. What is a Citation Worth?. The Journal of Human Resources (1986) vol. 21 (2) pp. 200-215  \u000Cdataset 85 cancer microarray trials published in 1999-2003, as identified by Ntzani and Ioannidis (2003) citations ISI Web of Science Citation index, citations from 2004-2005 data sharing locations Publisher and lab websites, microarray databases, WayBack Internet Archive, Oncomine statistics Multivariate linear regression  \u000CNote: log scale  \u000C~70%  \u000CNext?  http://www.flickr.com/photos/gatewaystreets/3838452287/  \u000CAbadie et al. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2010  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/boitabulle/3668162701/  \u000Chttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e6/ Gamma_distribution_pdf.svg/500px-Gamma_distribution_pdf.svg.png  \u000C\u000C\u000C#4 We are the culture. Let\u2019s do it.  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/joellevand/279468607/  \u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/huzzahvintage/4577075021/  \u000Ca) in our communities - strengthening policies: - journal, conference, institutional - decision-makers - role-models and educators  \u000Cb) in our tools  - measure opinions - measure use - be transparent!  \u000Cc) with our data - share it. - ugly? incomplete? strange? \u201CFlawed, but out there\u201D is a million times better than \u201Cperfect, but unattainable\u201D http://sciblogs.co.nz/seeing-data/2010/10/12/the-zen-of-open-data/  \u000C\u201CDoes anyone want your data? That\u2019s hard to predict [\u2026] After all, no one ever knocked on your door asking to buy those figurines collecting dust in your cabinet before you listed them on eBay. Your data, too, may simply be awaiting an effective matchmaker.\u201D Got data? Nature Neuroscience (2007)  \u000CI post my data, code, and statistical scripts: http://researchremix.org Share yours too!  http://www.flickr.com/photos/myklroventine/892446624/  \u000CMore info? \u2022\u00A0OATP\u00A0oa.data\u00A0tag\u00A0  on\u00A0Connotea,\u00A0Twi1er  \u2022\u00A0FriendFeed \u2022\u00A0Mendeley\u00A0  \u201Cdata\u00A0sharing\u201D\u00A0group  \u2022\u00A0@researchremix\u00A0  piwowar@zoology.ubc.ca\u00A0  \u000Cthank you Todd Vision, Michael Whitlock, Wendy Chapman The open science online community and those who release their articles, datasets and photos openly  \u000C\u000Chttp://www.flickr.com/photos/youraddresshere/6649228/  "@en
<https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubclibraryandarchives/2689/items/1.0077835>