<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"This is a Q &amp; A Intro to SEO 101 session with Jill Whalen, Bruce Clay, Jake Baillie, Bill Slawski, and Ash Nallawalla.\nQ: How important are on page factors now relative to off page factors?A: Bruce: If you do the wrong thing it will cause problems, on-page \u2013 best practices, spiderable, if do all pages correctly gets good jumps in ranking.Jill: Linking extremely important, both work together, on-page comes in handy, first get on-page stuff in order then focus on linking.  So many ppl look for links before even having decent title tags etc.Ashi : If working on competitive sites, off-page more imp., if not competitive on page more imp.\nTreat on page as formula, treat as guide. Bill:  Getting into competition is important. Being there without paying attention to content, not doing things well, not part of game. New thing people are not paying attention to: search engines indexing parts of pages instead of whole pages, need to think about how pages are laid out, if cover more than one topic, can use more than one heading on a page. Jake: if prioritize on-page factor, which is single most important to optimize first?Bill: unique content, title tags, meta, etc. are unique otherwise pages get lost. Crawl a site to make sure no issues with pages getting indexed. If SE\u2019s can\u2019t find pages, nothing matters. Which is most important? Bill: Probably the title. Ashi: Title, get architecture right.Jill: title tags, optimize for proper keywordsBruce: title tags most weight, body tags close second. Must have unique content on every page. Title more important. Need site map. Q:  What is the worst SEO factor you\u2019ve seen?Bruce: all flash, no site map.Jill: content in graphic big mistake. Ashi: whole website is one file, splash pagesBill: saw a website where 1 page was indexed 15,000 times. This page had 28 widgets and everytime clicked on url changed, hours to figure out why, minutes to fix with java script. Jake: dairyqueen.com \u2013 home page indexed as cookies required!Q: What is the biggest problem these days? Tips on avoiding dupe content problems, content issues?Bill: starts by crawl site with links sleuth. Find where the problem is \u2013 where the CMS is messing up. Xenu link sleuth rocks! Make sure robots.txt doesn\u2019t disallow Xenu. Ashi: Robots.txt is a good way to solve dupe content issues. Good examples are those who run Vbulletin forum software - they easily cause dupe content issues. Wordpress has a good plugin (forgot name) which puts a nofollow on every link. Use Firefox search status by quirk.biz allows you to view nofollow links. Individual posts have the follow tag, but all the duplicate links to the dupe page have nofollow.Jill: Don\u2019t use session IDs, feed engine clean URLs. If rewriting URL\u2019s to clean them \u2013 exclude the ugly URL\u2019s. Don\u2019t need to mod rewrite much these daysBruce: www vs. non www is a dupe content issues, also https: can have a problem. Content syndication can cause problems. Have to address that. Biggest problem is multiple pathways to same content because of the architecture. Pick pages you want indexed and de-index the ones you don\u2019t. Getting spidered is great \u2013 but they might interpret it as dupe content. Easiest way to resolve issues is do a site: in google and look for duplicate page titles. If you don\u2019t have duplicate page titles, and see them in the index, that\u2019s the big problem. Jake: How many people represent large brands that everyone\u2019s heard of? Can you guys tell us how you approach these sites?Bruce: We have a different approach for every site \u2013 it\u2019s a consulting solution \u2013 not a page by page. Need a consulting agreement.Jill: Good and bad with working with each, large and small sites. Large ones can be good. Sometimes doing training for people in house so they get excited about it \u2013 it can be good. Otherwise it\u2019s tough. Easier to work with a marketing manager that knows what SEO is. The challenge is great for large sites because they have many links. Don\u2019t need to do link building for large sites very often so it can be exciting.Ashi: Works with a large Australian online company with many divisions. Problem with the large company is that everyone is an expert in the online world. They have a lot of power to engage external consultants, and sometimes you get the business working with multiple SEO consultants. Some companies acquire technology for reasons other than SEO. Security might be the main priority. Maybe different divisions choose different CMS\u2019s and the site is built by multiple crews. Bill: Both large and small have unique changes. Need a strategy for each. Often find making a business case when presenting SEO. Work on templates instead of individual pages. Often not the first person there is a challenge. Play SEO archeology \u2013 one site had 2000 301 redirects from previous campaigns. Pities search engines for trying to figure out what\u2019s going on. Small sites can do investigative marketing research. Finding niches that large companies cannot take advantage of. No board meetings and committees. Both fun, just different.Jake: Open it up to the floor. Any questions:Q: We are in the process of moving into the world of CSS. What should we do?Bruce: I redid my site the same way it was done 12 years ago. Went to pure style sheets. Decided to make it W3C compliant. More content. Rankings went up. CSS won\u2019t cause any negatives. Style sheets work well.Jill: If leaving content same, no problems should arise from style sheets. Keep URLs the same. If not 301 redirect them. Jake: Long ago a concept was promoted of ratio between text to code. Does reducing that ratio help? Bill: MSFT looked at looking at onpage content in spam fighting. They spoke about code to content ratios and text to style ratio. Not sure that there is a magical percentage, other than in spam area. If there\u2019s a lot of code on the page, open to errors. I like CSS because it eliminates some types of duplicate content. Can use style sheets to have people view site on wireless devices which is growing fast. If not thinking about mobile, and how CSS can help \u2013 missing opportunities. Mobile search \u2013 it will help.Ashi: If you have a large website. Introduce changes gradually. Q: One of our products is a barcode scanner. People often search for \u201Cbar code\u201D as two words and one word. Most people search the technically wrong word. What do you recommend?Jill: Dedicate a page to misspelling. Doesn\u2019t recommend using both versions on the page. Bruce: When you get the \u201Cdid you mean\u201D, sometimes it disappears because the index is getting smarter. If you do a search and it asks \u201Cdid you mean\u201D, there is a prominence of the other way. Given that, I would want to rank with the way most people write. Ashi: Don\u2019t use misspellings on visible text. Try microsites around you that use misspelling and try to get traffic from them. Bill: This is an issue that search engines should handle better. Less a problem in English than German. As Bruce said, the engines mine query logs to understand how people search. Treatment and handling of merged words \u2013 look at the SERPs when doing keyword research. Has tried using alternate versions, but not too much. Jake: Write a page that asks \u2013 what\u2019s correct Bar Code or Barcode!Q: Talk a little bit about sitemaps \u2013 dynamic vs. manual \u2013 a Google sitemap- what\u2019s the importance to those and the best way to create them.Bruce: Need 2 \u2013 a spiderable one and an XML. Follow standard at sitemap.org. Can use a sitemap: command in robots.txt to point spiders to sitemap. Including Ask. Can daisy chain large amounts of sitemaps. Beware of dupe content! Jill: If your site is made correctly, don\u2019t really need it. Don\u2019t get the advantage unless you have a massive site. Without internal link structure, not going to succeed. Ash: There are lots of free tools and scripts \u2013 use for large websites \u2013 agrees with Jill. Bill: Agrees with Jill. Valuable for larger sites. Doesn\u2019t hurt to do it and see what happens. Look at webmaster central tools to see indexing errors. Make sure everything is there.Q: How do I use Mod rewrite  - how to find people who know how to do it.Jake: Webmasterworld is great for that. Ashi:  If you look for an .htaccess cheat sheet \u2013 it will help you.Jake: There is a session covering it.Jill: Look at forums.Q: How much of one\u2019s online budget should go to SEO:Bruce jokes: All of it (chuckles). Go with a ROI approach. If it works, spend more. Jill: Agrees. If making more on PPC, use PPC. All about ROI and conversions.Q:  Any relevance of domain name to ranking?Bruce: Matt Cutts said 0, 1, and 2 is the max in a domain. File names \u2013 max 14 hyphens. Try not to use hyphens in domain name. In filename ideal is just a few. In Google an underscore is a character and does not separate words.Bill: Subdomains, just to add. MSFT did a paper on spam. Found that subdomains that use lots of hyphens are flagged.Q: Search engine friendly pages and query strings. Is the only benefit the keywords? Can you help me with that?Jake: It\u2019s a pet peeve of mine. Parameters won\u2019t cause you not to be indexed.  It\u2019s not your problem. It\u2019s how you use them and how they create dupe content. Largely the issue is not the parameters.Jill: Jake said it all.Bill: Is keywords in the url part of the question? Yes. SE use lots of ranking signals \u2013 is there special importance to adding the keyword in the url \u2013 such as the query string. Not very many, but there might be some. Jill: In many cases don\u2019t change indexed pages, and then rewrite the URLs. Could be SEO suicide.Jake: Shorter URLs are good for usability. The shorter the better. Q: How do you deal with feed base sites?Bill: Do something better. Build better descriptions. When submitting feeds, make your website as crawlable as possible. Optimize the feed. Submit both. Might not get as crawled deeply if feed based. Bruce: If the query for a product is shopping related vs. intent based query \u2013 need an appropriate site. Mindset.research.yahoo.com is a great tool to analyze intent. Can optimize around that, need to know what search engines reporting. Jill: If you do it, and it makes you a positive ROI, continue doing it.Q: If you maintain the #1 position, what housekeeping should be done?Bruce: If it ain\u2019t broken don\u2019t fix it. If you rank #1, I\u2019ll go to the top 3 sites and ranking doesn\u2019t always mean conversions. If you are number 1, congrats your\u2019re doing well \u2013 focus on your bounce rate. Not a focus on SEO \u2013 don\u2019t break it \u2013 focus on your conversions. I might go to site #2, then site #3, then buy from site number 3. Jill: Make sure you are not optimizing for 1 phrase. You are optimizing for thousands or more phrases. Stop looking at the rankings. Look at conversions. Start thinking about what other phrases will get traffic. Ashi:  Keep a close eye on the competition.Bill: Broaden the ability of people that come to your site. Sometimes rankings are the wrong thing to look at. Long tail terms might be better. It\u2019s just not being number. Can\u2019t set and forget.Q: Follow up to Bruce \u2013 what can you do dynamically to improve conversions on organic pages?\nHow can you change the content based on the query string coming in.Bruce: A/B testing \u2013 improving copy so that bounce rate diminishes. It\u2019s a science and industry. There are good tools to focus on multivariate testing. When I search, I want to see my keyword at the top \u2013 not welcome to my site. Once someone comes to your site, the person is on a mission \u2013 you want to keep them there and answer there question and convert them. If you can\u2019t convince them, doesn\u2019t do you good. Bounce rates under 20% are good. Your question is a session in itself, but it must be done. Q:  What if a product is out of stock?Bruce: It matters if there a links to the page. Might want to 301 redirect it to pass the PR. Bill: Create a new page an continue to get traffic to that page \u2013 replace the product or add a new model. Q:This is a question on duplicate content question. We have good navigation for the user experience. When you go to different pages, has the same navigation. Do I want to a nofollow on the navigation?Jill: That\u2019s a typical way a site is built. No penalty. Ashi: One guy I know uses Iframes for navigations. I haven\u2019t tested it but it\u2019s worth thinking about.Bill: Doesn\u2019t hurt you to have the same navigation structure on every page. Bruce: In my case, my navigation is flash, just to reduce the html, and then footer links. In many cases there are too many links. Keep them less than 100 links, or use iFrames \u2013 must look at architecture of page. Make sure the search engines see the page as content. Under normal circumstances, don\u2019t have to worry about it. Q: Because spiders change behavior as do the engines, how do you prepare for that?Jill: Even though little things change to fight spammers, IMO the search engines always want the same thing \u2013 the best relevant page. That\u2019s your long term goal. Don\u2019t have to worry about these loophole changes to fight spammers.Bruce: My approach is more specific. I agree with Jill, search engines want the same thing and if you understand the use of normal architecture \u2013 chances are the items are not going to change. Play by the rules and the search engines won\u2019t penalize you. Bill: On the basis of crawling \u2013 there\u2019s a paper written in the late 90\u2019s by a Stanford professor \u2013 helped create Google. For example, how far a page is from the root directory. Search engines prefer many homepages verses many subpages. Based on architecture, links, PR \u2013 things you control \u2013 like trailing slashes in URL. Good paper worth looking at. Q: If a website\u2019s content is largely built on a subdirectory \u2013 should we move it to own domain? Bruce: Happens all the time. Split them up and use the 301\u2019s not hard, but tedious. Jill: A brand new domain needs an aging delay. 301\u2019s will help, but sometimes a new domain won\u2019t have the same equity as old directory.Q:Is there a correlation between inbound links and number of pages indexed. Would you start with the important pages in a sitemap?Bruce: No correlation. I think the searcher learns how to be more specific.Jill: If you have the content, put up the sitemap.Ashi: Did a test. Used sitemaps and Google indexed new pages quickest, then Yahoo, then MSN. Bill: Had a site with a million pages. Took 4-5 months for the first couple pages to get indexed. Search engines identify massive increases in links, pages and see something out of the ordinary. Visitors will give natural links and other marketing will help besides SEO.Contributed by Avi Wilensky is a search engine marketing specialist and owner of Promediacorp."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<https://www.seroundtable.com/archives/015547.html>