<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Today, several members of the House\u00A0subcommittee dealing with technology and communication urged the FCC's chairman Julius Genachowski to end his Commission's 'docket'\u00A0concerning\u00A0whether the Internet will be reclassified as a 'telecommunications service' and not an 'information service.'\r\n\r\nAccording to The Hill,\u00A0Genachowski stated that his group is yet accepting views from the public on the matter, and that to close the docket at this stage would be &amp;quot;unusual.&amp;quot;\r\n\r\nThis reclassification issue matters greatly for how the Internet will function in the United States. If the FCC does eventually reclassify the Internet as a\u00A0telecommunications\u00A0service, it will have larger legal standing to regulate it. Essentially, if the FCC decides to call the Internet a\u00A0telecommunications\u00A0service, the chance of its rules concerning net neutrality will have a stronger legal footing.\r\n\r\nAnd as Verizon is currently beating the door down concerning those provisions, the timing on the docket is becoming\u00A0increasingly\u00A0important. The FCC, under the\u00A0Communications Act, has strong power to regulate telecommunication services, but less in regards to 'information' services.\r\n\r\nThe argument, as it stands, is that the docket's status as open leads to uncertainty in the market. Whether or not that is the case, the simple closing of the docket would lead to a non-reclassification of the Internet. This could weaken, perhaps critically, the FCC's net neutrality standing in court.\r\n\r\nThe irony of this situation is that those arguing, in effect, for the end of net neutrality state that they are on the side of a free and open Internet, exactly what net neutrality rules were put in place to uphold.\r\n\r\nTop Image Credit:\u00A0Timothy Vollmer"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://thenextweb.com/insider/2012/07/10/despite-pressure-the-fcc-has-declined-to-decide-if-it-will-reclassify-the-internet-as-a-telecom-service/>