<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"  Because I still dress like a 16-year-old I pretty much only shop at Urban Outfitters.Sad, true, etc.Although it seems like I am always in there (fighting an actual 16-year-old for some really cute over-priced jacket that won&amp;#039;t even keep me warm and will fall apart in a week anyway), I somehow didn&amp;#039;t see this gem until last Saturday:  It&amp;#039;s in the men&amp;#039;s section, which might explain how I missed it. This shirt is dumb, right? Wearing a shirt with the name of your favorite band on it is stupid, but the cover of your favorite book is, like, way stupid. And I don&amp;#039;t care if the cover art is cool when it&amp;#039;s on the actual book.When it&amp;#039;s on your chest, it&amp;#039;s whack, and so are you, by extension. That model is being paid to wear it, and even he&amp;#039;s embarrassed. Back in the fall there was Internet bitching about the fact that these literary shirts (there used to be others, apparently, including one for On The Road) were only made for men and, I mean, sure, you could get upset about that and be offended that the only bookish shirt in the women&amp;#039;s section suggests that she&amp;#039;s a freak (it was a Where the Wild Things Are tee and it&amp;#039;s naughty).But women are dealing with much bigger issues and, again, the shirt is stupid, so no one should care if they can buy it or not. In unrelated news, this is the book blog&amp;#039;s last week. Sad!It&amp;#039;s been a lot of fun.Anyway, you&amp;#039;ve been warned. "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/books/a5564/urban-outfitters-blog/>