<http://schema.org/articleBody>
" It has not been a good couple of weeks for ABC&amp;#039;s Jonathan Karl, the man who passed along barbered information from some disreputable sources, and then got found out. Yesterday, having been caught injecting disinformation e coli into the mainstream, Karl issued a statement that almost broke the blog&amp;#039;s heretofore infallible weaselspeak-to-Engiish translation device.  &amp;quot;I regret that one email was quoted incorrectly and I regret that it&amp;#039;s become a distraction from the story, which still entirely stands. I should have been clearer about the attribution. We updated our story immediately when new information became available.&amp;quot;  Josh Marshall parks this one in the cheap seats. But far more interesting to me is the dossier compiled on Karl by the folks at FAIR. This makes his latest misadventure seem much less like an accident. Karl came to mainstream journalism via the Collegiate Network, an organization primarily devoted to promoting and supporting right-leaning newspapers on college campuses (Extra!, 9-10/91)-such as the Rutgers paper launched by the infamous James O&amp;#039;Keefe (Political Correction, 1/27/10). The network, founded in 1979, is one of several projects of the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, which seeks to strengthen conservative ideology on college campuses. William F. Buckley was the ISI&amp;#039;s first president, and the current board chair is American Spectator publisher Alfred Regnery. Several leading right-wing pundits came out of Collegiate-affiliated papers, including Ann Coulter, Dinesh D&amp;#039;Souza, Michelle Malkin, Rich Lowry and Laura Ingraham (Washington Times, 11/28/04). The Collegiate Network also provides paid internships and fellowships to place its members at corporate media outlets or influential Beltway publications; 2010-11 placements include the Hill, Roll Call, Dallas Morning News and USA Today. The program&amp;#039;s highest-profile alum is Karl, who was a Collegiate fellow at the neoliberal New Republic magazine. Long ago, Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur of Ohio once told me that she thought my craft went bad when it became the province almost exclusively of the over-educated, that it had professionalized itself out of its traditional role, that she wished there were a few more people practicing journalism who&amp;#039;d first worked on a loading dock, or in a mine, the way people used to come to the job. Here, with Karl, we apparently have a perfect product of the well-financed and staggeringly successful network of conservative institutions and programs launched more than 40 years ago by The Powell Memo. Assuming the FAIR report is accurate, then Jonathan Karl was not trained as a journalist, because the Collegiate Network doesn&amp;#039;t produce journalists. It produces partisan warriors. He was not trained as a reporter, because the Collegiate Network doesn&amp;#039;t produce reporters. It produces propagandists. He was not trained as a newsman, because the Collegiate Network doesn&amp;#039;t produce newsmen. It produces hacks. This is, of course, indelicate for someone in my business to say but, at every level of his steady rise in the business, some executive should have looked at Karl&amp;#039;s resume, seen The Collegiate Network there, and then shitcanned the thing before the interview process even began. Are there conservatives who are good reporters? Absolutely. But all the ones that I know came up the same way I did, and none of them came up through the coddled terrariums of the activist Right. They learned their craft. They were not trained to be spies in the camp of the enemy. They were not trained to be moles. And every damn one of them would have checked those phony e-mails before throwing them out to the public, and most of them wouldn&amp;#039;t have fallen for them, because they are journalists, reporters, and newsmen. They are not partisan warriors, propagandists, or hacks. If Jonathan Karl doesn&amp;#039;t like being called a hack, then he should stop being a hack. Here&amp;#039;s one way to do it. Blow the source who lied to you and, therefore, lied to us. Do that. Or be a hack. There&amp;#039;s no third alternative. "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a18565/jonathan-karl-bad-awful-week/>