<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"   Under the Affordable Care Act, employers are required to pay for their employees&amp;#039; birth control. However, the Obama administration has proposed a compromise for nonprofit religious institutions that object to paying for contraception coverage. The compromise goes something like this: Religious groups tell their insurers that they oppose contraception for religious reasons and the insurers will offer female employees a separate, contraception-only policy without co-pays. And then, the government will reimburse the insurers for the additional cost of coverage. Okay, it&amp;#039;s still annoying that religious orgs can cop out of providing their employees with the same coverage rights as the rest of us, but at least it&amp;#039;s better than nothing. With the previous ruling, organizations who had a religious objection to birth control coverage didn&amp;#039;t have to comply (at least for now), leaving the women who worked for them SOL in terms of family management. What do you think of this new rule? Want more from Dara? Follow her on Twitter @dadeeyo. "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/news/a11592/obama-birth-control-religious-groups/?link=emb&dom=yah_life&src=syn&con=blog_cosmo&mag=cos>