<http://schema.org/articleBody>
" Given that John Edwards has looked so consistently put-together during his trial for alleged campaign finance violations, we&amp;#039;re a bit surprised that his hair has become so flat. From the neck down, he&amp;#039;s been the archetype of a man using clothing as armor, so as to defend against any accusations being thrown his way, what with those dark suits, wide lapels, and boardroom-ready ties against equally courtroom-ready white or light blue dress shirts. All expensive threads, to be sure. We also happen to know that Edwards did prefer, at least at one point, haircuts that cost as much as 400 bucks. But there must a be a happy medium here, because these Supercuts he&amp;#039;s been getting don&amp;#039;t jibe with his wardrobe. The problem, it seems, is that the man&amp;#039;s parted hair is pretty long, incredibly straight, and seemingly fine. So, without the best care \u2014 and some regular washing, too \u2014 it takes on a toupee-like sheen and shape, or what a lady might describe when she says that your hair looks &amp;quot;greasy&amp;quot; to her friends at bar. We won&amp;#039;t go that far, because we&amp;#039;re sure he&amp;#039;s grappling with a lot more than personal grooming each morning \u2014 and actually, his hair looked pretty good today, when he wore that green tie \u2014 but we do have one suggestion: dry Shampoo. It&amp;#039;ll help keep things from looking too bogged down, as if some creature has come to court on his head. Normally, that might be too precious a suggestion for us to fling at a man in a business suit. But no matter: This is John Edwards, he who once cared enough to spend so much money on his hair in the first place. He who know is surrounded by television cameras that won&amp;#039;t let him forget it. Hubris. Or something. "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.esquire.com/style/grooming/a13890/john-edwards-hair-050112/>