<http://schema.org/articleBody>
" Oh, c&amp;#039;mon, Senator McDreamy. It&amp;#039;s far too early for this kind of whining. If there&amp;#039;s one politician in America who doesn&amp;#039;t get to complain about the local media&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;fluffing&amp;quot; of another candidate, it&amp;#039;s this guy, whose freak election was treated as a World Historical Event, and who&amp;#039;s been treated throughout his tenues in the Senate as though he were a darling little local curiosity on a par with Plymouth Rock or the Red Sox bullpen. (In the wake of his election, the editorial page of the putatively liberal Boston Globe truckled hilariously on the topic of how &amp;quot;we&amp;quot; all had to get behind McDreamy, now that he was our elected senator.) One gets the feeling now that he honestly bought all this stuff \u2014 that he was a paradigm-changing political figure, and not just a state senator fighting above his weight class. (Although a nervous Scott Brown does cast better votes than a confident Scott Brown.) Now, it seems, someone has had the audacity to run against him, and to be serious about doing it, and she seems oblivious to how Scott Brown&amp;#039;s election changed everything in American politics. And, by the way, has he reminded you lately about what an underdog he is? &amp;quot;She&amp;#039;s going to have every advantage.... I don&amp;#039;t have a machine behind me like she will, and she does clearly,&amp;quot; Brown said.  No, all he has is a massive amount of money raised on Wall Street, the full and lucrative attention of the Republican National Committee, and, more than likely, the support of every corporate super-PAC and sugar daddy from here to David Koch&amp;#039;s wallet. Plucky is as plucky does, McDreamy. "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a12163/scott-brown-whining-6627774/>