<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Not just famous for its deep dish pizza and sports teams anymore, Chicago has a new thing...Is this what a sugar daddy looks like? As if I would have any idea. ...It&amp;#x27;s apparently where wealthy men are the most promiscuous. SeekingArrangement.com conducted a study of 5,000 of its sugar daddy members, asking them how many sexual partners they had per year. If a man had more than seven, he was deemed &amp;quot;promiscuous&amp;quot; (no word on what determined that number as the standard). And the cities with the highest percentage of guys who are promiscuous is as follows: Chicago 72% Birmingham 70% Las Vegas 68% Oklahoma City 64% Atlanta 62% Phoenix 61% Philadelphia 59% Hoboken 57% Richmond 55% Hartford 54% The least promiscuous? New York and San Francisco were among them, with less than 15% of their sugar daddies having seven-plus partners a year. Yep, NYC and San Fran: where men will basically pay for women to be their girlfriends, but not seven of them a year. Way to have standards! Obviously, the statistics probably aren&amp;#x27;t relevant to the average man in Chicago or Atlanta or wherever, since the average guy probably isn&amp;#x27;t a member of this particular type of dating website. But still, it&amp;#x27;s an interesting breakdown of the guys who are, right? When I think of Chicago guys, I pretty much just picture a bunch of mustached huskies cheering for Da Bears, not a bunch of promiscuous sugar daddies. But hey, those beefy dudes are more my style anyway. Any surprises here? Anybody know any Chicago playboys? Are you surprised the Big Apple has such non-promiscuous sugar daddies? Sex and all the cities: *The 25 Best Places For the Rich and Single (Or Uh, Those Looking For Someone Rich and Single) *The 10 Cities With The Lowest Date-To-Sex Ratio *Like Your Men Burly and Gruff? Head to America&amp;#x27;s 50 Manliest Cities."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.glamour.com/sex-love-life/blogs/smitten/2012/10/the-10-most-promiscuous-cities>