<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"  We always love a good Twitter rampage, especially when it comes from one of our favorite, well-spoken celebs. But a 140 characters-or-less takedown from none other than notoriously sweet Sarah Jessica Parker? Perfection. And it happened last night, when someone named Sarah J. Symonds set the actress off. SJP&amp;#039;s response may have been as perfectly eloquent as one might expect \u2014 but her four-tweet slam did not mess around. Since it was quickly deleted, nobody is really sure what the offending tweet actually said, but an investigative Google search found that it basically implied that Parker and husband Matthew Broderick&amp;#039;s three children don&amp;#039;t look like SJP \u2014 and since @SarahJSymonds identifies herself as an &amp;quot;Infidelity Analyst&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Founder of Mistresses Anonymous&amp;quot; (what?), it&amp;#039;s not difficult to put two and two together and get the gist of what the tweet said. (This woman has also evidently been on Oprah.) Related: How Sarah Jessica Parker Is Capitalizing on Carrie Bradshaw&amp;#039;s Shoe Obsession Here is SJP&amp;#039;s response in all its glory:    Your anonymity doesn&amp;amp;#39;t diminish your outrageous and vulgar tweet. And your deletion only reveals your cowardice. @SarahJSymonds \u2014 Sarah Jessica Parker (@SJP) April 3, 2014      I&amp;amp;#39;m certain there isn&amp;amp;#39;t a woman on this planet who would support your specific kind of cruelty. No apology, no explanation. @SarahJSymonds \u2014 Sarah Jessica Parker (@SJP) April 3, 2014      You should be ashamed @SarahJSymonds. I hope more people join me in voicing their objection to and holding accountable... (cont) \u2014 Sarah Jessica Parker (@SJP) April 3, 2014      ...uninformed and unkind women like yourself who find pleasure and delight in attacking other women. @SarahJSymonds \u2014 Sarah Jessica Parker (@SJP) April 3, 2014   Let me just say bravo, not just because Symonds clearly deserved to be confronted, but also because Parker&amp;#039;s reaction is a lesson in how to be angry and intelligent. In short, she acted in every way that Symonds didn&amp;#039;t \u2014 where the offender was uninformed, unsolicited, tactless, and, let&amp;#039;s call a spade a spade \u2014 downright rude and cruel, SJP simply made it very clear that the behavior would not be tolerated. One of the sad, sad side effects of the social media age is that people just post things without seeming to realize that others can actually read them. This whole exchange also serves as a reminder that even the extremely famous are totally human, with personal lives and families, too. Lesson number two: Sarah Jessica Parker might be totally adorable and loveable, but you do not want to cross her. Related: Sarah Jessica Parker&amp;#039;s Best Looks Related: Sarah Jessica Parker: &amp;quot;I Wore More Shoes in a Day Than Any Human Wears in Their Lifetime&amp;quot; Photo credit: Getty Images Via ELLE "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/news/a23139/sarah-jessica-parker-twitter-rant/?click=cos_new>