<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Home may be where the heart is but it wouldn&amp;#x27;t hurt if it were also where are the single men are, would it? According to a new Bloomberg study, ranking cities based on total population of single people, percentage of single men and women, and median household income, these are the 15 places I need to consider moving to, stat. Well I don&amp;amp;#8217;t care that much about median income, but I am very interested in these cities where there are lots and lots of single men. What can I say? I like to have options. Here are the top 15 cities according to overall score--but I&amp;amp;#8217;ve included the stat that matters most to me, the percentage of males who are single. 15. Frisco, Texas, 27.57% 14. Highlands Ranch, Colorado, 30.78% 13. Johns Creek, Georgia, 29.03% 11. South Jordan, Utah (tie), 37.82% 11. Maple Grove, Minnesota (tie), 36.25% 10. Cupertino, California, 34.71% 9. Weston, Florida, 37.82% 8. Ellicott City, Maryland, 35.78% 7. Levittown, New York, 43.15% 5. Stamford, Connecticut (tie), 48.75% 5. Bolingbrook, Illinois (tie), 42.36% 4. Newton, Massachusetts, 48.90% 3. Redmond, Washington, 50.02% 2. Arlington, Virginia, 58.42% 1. Hoboken, New Jersey, 68.38% Hoboken has been making a lot of these top-ranked cities lately, have you noticed? As a former Manhattanite, I&amp;amp;#8217;m formally trained to sneer at anything in Jersey but I may need to lose the &amp;#x27;tude, dude. Anybody live in any of these cities? The Huffington Post points out that the top five are smaller cities outside of larger metropolitan areas. Do you think that&amp;#x27;s the key to a good place for singles? Other places to be: *The 10 Cities With The Lowest Date-To-Sex Ratio *Like Your Men Burly and Gruff? Head to America&amp;#x27;s 50 Manliest Cities. *And the Cities That Value Sex the Most (and Least) Are...Did Your City Make the List? Photo: Thinkstock"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.glamour.com/sex-love-life/blogs/smitten/2012/10/single-women-pay-attention-the>