<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Blizzard (via Nethaera) has released a nice long statement on the Glider outcome over on the forums.  She basically runs through the history of the case and why Blizzard is against what Glider is doing, and why going through the courts was the only route left to them.  She says that Warden (though called only \"security measures\") was enabled in response to player concerns about bots, and that when the MDY/Glider people circumvented Warden, their only recourse was to seek an injunction through the courts, which, as we've reported recently, they plan to have soon.She does say that Blizzard won based on the judge's decision that MDY did violate the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, but Neth doesn't go any further into the issue, and doesn't elaborate at all on what might happen if this case is used as a precedent against other types of Terms of Use violations.  As you might expect from an official Blizzard telling of the tale, the case is seen as a victory for Blizzard and their players -- for them, it's all about keeping bots out of Azeroth, and this decision will definitely help them do that.And that's obviously not a bad thing -- most players will agree that MDY was allowing players to cheat (by letting the game play automatically without them in control), and thus preventing the client from being used in-game is a good thing.  It's just that DMCA issue that might be a nagging problem -- we'll have to see what happens with that in the future."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/blizzard-responds-to-the-glider-decision/>