<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Editor's note:\u00A0This article by Liam Boogar\u00A0originally appeared\u00A0on Rude Baguette, which covers\u00A0the Internet and technology sector in France, combining breaking news with in-depth analysis.\r\n\r\nA recent report by DigitalMusicNews has shown that Deezer\u2018s paid subscriber rate is growing faster than that of Spotify. \r\n\r\nDeezer has seen a growth of 114% from December 2011 to December 2012, versus Spotify\u2019s 86% growth. This is surprising, given Spotify\u2019s positioning as the #1 paid subscription music service; however, it\u2019s important to remember what has happened in the past year.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nFrom Digital Music News:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nA. Paid Downloads: 1.336 billion. Up 5%. (iTunes, Amazon, etc.)\r\nB. Spotify Subscribers: 5.2 million. Up 86%.\r\nC. Spotify Active Users: 20 million. Up 100%.\r\nD. Deezer Subscribers: 3 million. Up 114%\r\nE. Sirius XM Radio Subscribers: 23.4 million. Up 6.9%.\r\nF. Pandora Listening Hours (per qtr): 3.56 billion. Up 67.9%.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIn December of 2011, Deezer announced it was launching internationally at LeWeb \u2013 this was around the time people learned it would be launching virtually everywhere but in the US. Following that, Deezer began rolling out in several dozens of countries, in addition to announcing a round of funding of, oh say, \u20AC100 Million from Warner Bros Music owner &amp;amp; billionaire Len Blavatnik.\r\n\r\nSince then, Spotify has continued to grow, with an equally impressive round of funding; however, their activity in the US has made them the target of scrutiny and attacks by the music industry and media. \r\n\r\nReports coming out detailing how the contracts that Spotify had signed made it nearly impossible for them to be revenue positive in the long-run, reports that artists make less than $.01 per track listening on Spotify, making it the least valuable way for an artist to monetize its music, didn\u2019t help its image either. \r\n\r\nThey had a few wins, such as Metallica, the band which notoriously fought against Napster in the early 2000s, announcing their entire discography would be available for download; however, Spotify has become the image of online music services, and thus, had to commit a lot of resources to defending that image.\r\n\r\nMeanwhile, Deezer, which operates under similar contracts with labels and has similar ties to the music industry, has left the US out of the equation, attacking all other markets first \u2013 and it\u2019s paying off. With paid subscribers at around 3 Million, Deezer lags behind Spotify by about 2 Million subscribers, an amount that could easily be gained in the next year or two, depending on where they go looking for subscribers.\r\n\r\nSpotify recently quietly shut down a paid downloading service in Europe \u2013 potentially indicating that they are losing traction on their original European audience; after all, they are originally Swedish. Deezer has maintained solid ground in France, and is slowly taking market share in European countries and elsewhere.\r\n\r\nI personally believe that this war will come down to one thing: developers. Both companies launched App Stores in 2012, and the race is now on to see which service can attract developers to create apps to add value to the experience, and turn their platform for music into an ecosystem which relies on the music data they have access to.\r\n\r\nAlso read:\r\n\r\nDeezer launches ad-supported streaming in 150 countries and supports artists with new D4A service\r\n\r\nDeezer CEO Axel Dauchez on why the company WILL launch in the US when the time\u2019s right [Video]\r\n\r\nSpotify announces 5M+ paid subscribers globally, 1M paid in US, 20M total active users, 1B playlists\r\n\r\nDigital drives a successful 2012 for singles in the UK, but album sales fall overall\r\n\r\nTop image credit: Thinkstock\r\n\r\n"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://thenextweb.com/eu/2013/01/08/deezer-spotify/>