<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"If we put aside for a moment the fact that Paul Newman&amp;#x27;s recent death means the loss of an uncommonly good person, a trailblazing philanthropist, and one hell of a good actor, you must still account for the absence of one impeccable sense of Hollywood style. Whether he was kitted out in a perfectly tailored suit, a beat up pair of chinos, or shirtless with a cigarette dangling from his lip, Newman cut a dashing figure right up to his 83rd and final year. It&amp;#x27;s no wonder GQ named him one of the 50 Most Stylish Men of the Past 50 Years--a title he earned despite, according to the magazine, a penchant for keeping things casual: &amp;quot;According to Newman&amp;amp;#8217;s publicist and friend of more than fifty years, Warren Cowan, &amp;#x27;After Paul won the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award in 1993, he had a bonfire with his tuxedo because he said he never wanted to wear a black tie again. Shortly after, he gave away his entire wardrobe. He&amp;amp;#8217;s down to just a few pairs of slacks and cords, a few shirts and sweaters. He says his life is much simpler. He&amp;amp;#8217;s much happier.&amp;#x27;&amp;quot; The only guy who could have possibly made jeans and a T-shirt look cooler was Brando, circa Streetcar. But then, Brando never made a contribution to society quite like Fig Newmans or Extra Virgin Lemonade--so I&amp;#x27;ve gotta give this point to Paul. Now the only question that remains is who will take his place as the arbiter of cool in young Hollywood. What do you guys think? Do any leading men have what it takes to fill Paul Newman&amp;#x27;s very stylish shoes? Who gets your vote for heir to his fashion throne? Photo: Everett Collection "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.glamour.com/fashion/blogs/dressed/2008/09/paul-newman-1925-2008-the-defi>