<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"This is the first time I have ever heard of someone using Google as a method of providing a logical explanation for a unsupported statement.  What am I talking about?  In Danny Sullivan's post he discussed a conversation he had with Fox news where a reporter asked him his thoughts on using Google's \"total results\" figure to determine whether or not the BBC is anti-american.His logic was that by typing in to Google bbc anti-american a total results of 51,300 came up.Shocking that people would use Google as a means to provide support to an argumentative statement.  Danny's response was (not quoting here) that Fox news was more anti-american because they had 54,000 for fox anti-american.  They are 2,700 more results anti-american then the BBC.  This is too funny."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<https://www.seroundtable.com/archives/000570.html>