<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"The raid and subsequent shutdown of file-sharing service Megaupload not only hacked off members of Anonymous, it also underscores one of the inherent vulnerabilities in storing data in the cloud.\nBeyond just providing easy TV access to college students without cable, Megaupload and the other sites in its network helped encompass the largest digital locker service in the world. While we suspect that the majority of Megaupload users were not storing family photos and personal documents, the site was exceedingly popular with users. \nArs Technica reports that Megaupload consumed more bandwidth in corporate workplaces than cloud-storage and collaboration services like Dropbox and Box.net.\nSince the Megaupload shutdown, users with non-infringing content served on Megaupload's servers have expressed outrage at no longer having access to their content.\nAccording to the federal indictment, the data center that housed Megaupload's servers had more than 1,000 different computers and contained more than 25 petabytes (25 million gigabytes) of data storage. That's a lot of data. \nThe fact that Megaupload stored so much information \u2014 and for so many potential users \u2014 got us thinking about the bigger implications of the cloud, online storage and the rights of law enforcement.\nCould a Service Like Dropbox Get TKO'ed Megaupload Style?\nAlthough cloud storage and backup services have existed in various forms for well over a decade, few companies have managed to make the concept easy to understand and use. Dropbox is one of the few companies that has managed to present a concept \u2014 and a service \u2014 that is easy to understand and invaluable to use.\nI'm a Dropbox Pro user myself and I gladly pay $99 a year for 50 GB of storage. I use Dropbox with Mashable colleagues, friends and family members. I also use Dropbox as a way to back up my music and video libraries. In most cases, these are files that I have digitally purchased or ripped from a CD. Still, the nature of Dropbox and its ability to easily share files with others means that hypothetically, I could share my Amazon MP3 library with someone else. \nThat opens up the question: If the district court could shutdown charge Megaupload and its employees with \"conspiracy to commit copyright infringement\" (amongst other crimes) and shut down the service (including access to non-infringing files), could a much more legitimate service like Dropbox be next?\nRight now, the answer is \"no.\" Megaupload's problems go far beyond the content its users uploaded to the service. The government case against the company and its employees alleges money laundering, trafficking and a blatant disregard for copyright, even in the face of takedown notices. A court will make the final determination as to the validity of these charges, but suffice to say this isn't just about copyright infringement.\nMoreover, current safe harbor rules don't hold Internet services accountable for the the actions of their customers. In other words, if I commit copyright infringement by using Dropbox to share music and movies with my friends, Dropbox as a service isn't liable for my actions (provided it kicks me off when presented with my misdeeds).\nOne of the major problems with the SOPA and PIPA legislation was the restriction of these safe harbor legislations. Web services \u2014 and even websites including Mashable \u2014 could be held responsible for the actions of users, even if the services themselves were unaware of those actions.\nWhile SOPA in its current form is dead \u2014 or at least is on hiatus \u2014 it's important to remember that if it or similar measures pass, what has happened to the (few) legitimate users of Megaupload could happen to other services as well.\nThe Cloud Isn't Always Forever\nAs I've read accounts of users who actually used Megaupload for work or personal file storage, I've been struck by two things.\n\nWhy would you choose Megaupload over Skydrive, Dropbox or YouSendIt? I mean, really.\nThe cloud isn't a panacea or a total replacement for off-site backups.\n\nThis isn't the first time that a cloud service has gone offline and taken user files with them, and it won't be the last. In the mid-2000s, a rush of online storage services raced on the scene, only to go belly-up a few years later.\nCloud storage and online backup is a wonderful thing, but it cannot \u2014 and should not \u2014 be the sole backup solution for a person's most important files and documents.\nInstead, I advocate a combination of backup policies that combines local backup (preferably on a RAID setup) and cloud backups. For truly important files, an offsite local backup (in a firesafe box or safe deposit box) is also a great idea.\nEven if you pay a service money for backup and storage space, disasters do happen. Proper backups at multiple locations is the best way to protect yourself from the pain of losing important files.\nAlso \u2014 if you're using a service that is best known as a pirates paradise to store and transfer work or personal files \u2014 it might be time to switch to a provider with a bit less heat."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://mashable.com/2012/01/20/megaupload-sopa-dropbox/>