<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"search_engine981:https://www.seroundtable.com/archives/017091.htmlBack in October of 2007, Google launched Set Geographic Target in Google Webmaster Tools.  It basically allowed you to tell Google if your site is based in a certain geographic location.  For example, let's say you had a UK site, using a .com domain - Google would often not give the site any preference in the Google UK search results, unless it had a co.uk TLD.  The Set Geographic Target option was suppose to give Google more clues about the site and help it rank better in the local that was specified with the tool.\n\n\nA Google Groups thread leaves me to believe that it might not be the case.  Susan Moskwa, an official Google representative said:\n\n\nUsing the tool to target example.com to the UK may have some effect on  non-country-restricted searches, but it probably won't be the same as  having example.co.uk. Most sites will see results somewhere between  the two extremes (no effect, and total equivalence with ccTLDs).\n\n\nWait, so are you saying setting your geographic target may or may not have an impact on how your rank in a localized version of Google?  Let me bold Susan's response, \" Most sites will see results somewhere between  the two extremes (no effect, and total equivalence with ccTLDs.\"\n\n\nHmm and I not understanding the response?  I am not sure.  I have seen dozens of posts complaining that the tool doesn't improve their ranking in the localized Google version.  In fact, respected SEO, David Naylor just posted a blog post with the title, Google Webmaster Tools smoke n mirrors.  In that post, he expresses his dissatisfaction with the tool and describes how it simply doesn't work for him.\n\n\nDoes it work for you?  Please do comment with your feedback, if you have any.\n\n\nForum discussion at Google Groups."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<https://www.seroundtable.com/archives/017091.html>