<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Back in December, Diane Kruger took the menswear trend to the next level with a look I called a &amp;quot;tux for chicks.&amp;quot; Only 40% of you thought it was a Do. But Diane revisited a similar look this weekend--will you be won over this time around? Here&amp;#x27;s Diane back in December, doing a the formal thing in a pair of high-waisted satin pleated pants, a sleeveless satin top, a bow tie, and a pair of Christian Louboutin modern-day Mary Janes with a little peep toe. 40% of you said it was a Do, 60% a Don&amp;#x27;t. &amp;quot;good theory, but poor execution - the whole thing just looks lumpy! the proportions are just weird and her hips look huge,&amp;quot; commenter Spazette wrote. Let&amp;#x27;s see if her more recent attempt is an improvement... Here she is again at the Melbourne premiere of Inglorious Basterds. She&amp;#x27;s in a Chanel outfit that totally references Karl Lagerfeld&amp;#x27;s signature style--it&amp;#x27;s a bit more crisp and tailored than her first attempt, and she accessorized with a pair of suspenders and those same Louboutin shoes. What do you think, dolls? Are you a creature of fashion habit, like Diane is? Do you tend to buy and wear the same types of outfits over and over again? And which of these two tuxes do you like better? Discuss! Which of Diane Kruger&amp;#x27;s tuxedo looks do you like better?(trends) Add glamour.com to your Google homepage Follow Slaves to Fashion on Twitter! Friend us on Facebook Photos: Getty Images; Hannah Mason/WireImage"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.glamour.com/fashion/blogs/dressed/2009/08/diane-krugers-tux-redux-which>