<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"  Lena Dunham is on the cover of Vogue, which is very, very exciting. But Jezebel is not satisfied seeing the photos that made it into the magazine and on the cover. The site has offered $10,000 for unretouched images of the Girls creator. &amp;quot;This is about Vogue, and what Vogue decides to do with a specific woman who has very publicly stated that she&amp;#039;s fine just the way she is, and the world needs to get on board with that. Just how resistant is Vogue to that idea? Unaltered images will tell,&amp;quot; Jezebel editor Jessica Coen wrote. The Internet did not approve of this request, with good reason: Stylite&amp;#039;s Hannah Ongley made her feelings clear in the headline: &amp;quot;Jezebel Offers $10,000 for Untouched Photos of Lena Dunham, We Throw Up a Little.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;It&amp;#039;s not only fun to call out magazines when they&amp;#039;ve retouched so excessively as to amputate limbs and vital organs \u2014 it&amp;#039;s necessary. Without active critique, we&amp;#039;ll just see less and less realistic images of what women&amp;#039;s bodies look like,&amp;quot; Ongley wrote. &amp;quot;But handing over a $10,000 reward to whichever underpaid assistant in Vogue&amp;#039;s photo department risks their job to cough up the photos just seems vindictive.&amp;quot; Jenni Maier at Crushable said she doesn&amp;#039;t even like Lena Dunham and she had a problem with this move: &amp;quot;It&amp;#039;s not even close to okay. In fact, it&amp;#039;s so far from okay, that this offer and okay are in completely different time zones ... there&amp;#039;s nothing wrong with wanting to look better than your best when you&amp;#039;re doing a Vogue photo shoot. In the same way there&amp;#039;s nothing wrong with Lena Dunham getting decked out at award shows.&amp;quot; HuffPost New York&amp;#039;s associate editor Inae Oh called Jezebel&amp;#039;s request &amp;quot;seriously misguided,&amp;quot; writing, &amp;quot;Just because Dunham is a young feminist who speaks confidently about her &amp;#039;real body&amp;#039; does not mean we get to qualify her statements with an inappropriate cash prize.&amp;quot; And then there was the conversation on Twitter:    Yeah, the Jezebel thing offering 10k for untouched Lena Dunham pics is crass. Def smells like click bait &amp;amp; tad like bullying \u2014 Maritza Lugo (@PolaRoid_Rage) January 16, 2014      The first Jezebel bounty was about shaming ladymags. This seems like shaming Lena Dunham. http://t.co/EziejFLj0I \u2014 Michelle Goldberg (@michelleinbklyn) January 16, 2014      Offering $10,000 for unretouched images of @lenadunham? Cruel. I&amp;amp;#39;m a #badfeminist, but if I&amp;amp;#39;m in Vogue, photoshop the fuck out of me. \u2014 Jill Filipovic (@JillFilipovic) January 16, 2014      Even though she gets naked &amp;amp; &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; on TV, Dunham&amp;amp;#39;s entitled to a little Vogue-cover fantasy w/o public humiliation in the name of feminism. \u2014 Jill Filipovic (@JillFilipovic) January 16, 2014      I used to read @Jezebel until they offered $10,000 for the unretouched shots from Lena Dunham&amp;amp;#39;s Vogue cover. Disgusting, shameful self-promo \u2014 Ailsa Miller (@ailsajmiller) January 16, 2014   Lena Dunham, in the meantime, seems perfectly happy with her photos. What do you think? Is Jezebel&amp;#039;s offer fair or shameless? Photo Credit: Vogue "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/news/a18708/jezebel-lena-dunham-vogue/?click=rel>