<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"For all of those people who think Victoria Beckham is just skin and bones, &amp;quot;a bobblehead,&amp;quot; as she&amp;#x27;s been called right here on these pages, feast your eyes on this: The celeb&amp;#x27;s new ads for Armani underwear have just been released, and The Cut thinks she&amp;#x27;s looking pretty damn sexy indeed. And I can&amp;#x27;t disagree. When the announcement was first made that Posh would serve as the female counterpart to David&amp;#x27;s on-fire men&amp;#x27;s underwear ads for Armani, a few of you were skeptical. &amp;quot;I&amp;#x27;d rather see someone with more sex appeal,&amp;quot; one commenter said. After looking at these photos, I&amp;#x27;d like to know who that someone is! I think she&amp;#x27;s looking toned and fit and downright beautiful here. The deal she signed with Armani is for three years and supposedly worth more than $24 million, so maybe the star, who has said she looks &amp;quot;really awful naked,&amp;quot; has been hitting the gym to make sure she doesn&amp;#x27;t disappoint. Either way, I&amp;#x27;m surprised and impressed and not feeling at all like she&amp;#x27;s a walking toothpick in these pictures. What do you guys think? Are you surprised by what you&amp;#x27;re seeing here? Do you think she was a good choice to model for Armani underwear, after all? And as for Mr. and Mrs. Beckham, do they or do they not comprise the most smoking hot Hollywood couple to ever pose in their skivvies?! What do you think of Victoria Beckham&amp;#x27;s new Armani ads? ( polls) Photos: Courtesy of Emporio Armani"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.glamour.com/fashion/blogs/dressed/2009/01/victoria-beckhams-new-armani-u>