<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"In Autumn 2007, someone took a picture of me and put it on the web. In this low-angle shot taken at my peak weight, I looked like Jabba the Hutt wearing a blue T-shirt. Since the picture illustrated a popular blog post, it immediately became the first result when you did an image search on my name. Mortified at the sight of what I had become, I immediately did two things: I started to eat better and exercise in order to lose weight, and I flooded the Internet with better-looking images of myself hoping to drive the fat picture off the front page of search results. The second effort was a lot easier than the first, but eventually both were successful.\nRecently I wanted to show someone what I used to look like, but the picture wouldn't turn up. Every search term I tried, every date range, every filter, returned nothing. While the picture is probably still sitting on a server somewhere, there seems to be no reasonable way to get at it. For all intents and purposes, I am no longer grossly obese on the Internet.\nThis is in complete contrast to the warnings we've been hearing since the mid-1990s, that \"On the Internet, pictures of you exist forever;\" that \"These pictures will resurface in the future;\" that \"You will be tagged forever.\"\nGranted, these warnings were usually aimed at those posting photos of naked teenage hijinks, not of chubby, fully-clothed writers. But it seems that even the naked teens of the early 2000s may not find their lives ruined someday by the rediscovery of a long-forgotten online photo.\nTake the case of Margaret R. (not her real name), 30, currently the chief financial officer of a boutique consulting firm. When she turned 18, Margaret R. became a nude model for a website that tried to blur the edges between porn and subculture (vaguely like Suicide Girls, but without the drama). One of the site's most popular models, she did numerous photo shoots and videos, and her images regularly migrated to porn aggregator sites all over the Internet.\nBy the time she quit the business at 21, an image search on her modeling name returned page after page of these photos.\nAs the quintessential naked teenage girl on the Internet, Margaret R.'s life should have been ruined forever. But earlier this month, when we searched the Internet for her old pictures, Margaret R. and I discovered that they show up infrequently, if at all. Even better, it's almost always the tamest images that have survived, the ones any model might have in a portfolio. She told me that this confirms what she's known for the past 10 years: Her brief career in internet porn has never had any effect on her life since. \"Once I quit and stopped being involved there hasn't been anything. I'm actually a little surprised about that, I sort of expected it to follow me more.\"  \nWhy are the \"experts\" wrong about our Internet past sticking around forever? Is it that something has changed in the way we access information through search engines in the past 10 years? Or are these two examples \u2014 my unfortunate pictures and Ms. R.'s nude pictures \u2014 just weird anomalies?\nAccording to Jon Kleinberg, professor of computer science at Cornell University, there's no real contradiction. \"The question of why something stays in a search engine's results, and what causes it to show up in response to searches, is a composite of so many things that it's hard to point to any one overriding factor, but a useful working heuristic is that someone on the Internet has to exert at least a minimum of effort in order to keep it around \u2014 it has to remain on a machine somewhere that's getting indexed by a search engine, with some sort of way to get to it.\"\nFurther, according to Kleinberg, this minimum of effort is pretty minimal. Websites like YouTube and Flickr actively encourage the indexing of their content by search engines, so it's easy to find photos on them that go back many years. But have you searched for an image from your Friendster days? Kleinberg explains, \"Our methods for searching pictures are more primitive than our methods for searching text. And pictures are huge \u2014 they take up a lot of bytes on a hard drive \u2014 so if the site goes away, the consolidation that keeps a lot of things current can also cause a lot of things to vanish all at once, when the effort is no longer being applied.\"\nThat's something Larry Zillox, president of Investigative Research Specialists of Bristow, Virginia, knows all too well. \"Very often, places where pictures are posted on the Internet just go away,\" he says. \"The company name gets sold, and the new owners just delete the old content. Sometimes they delete accounts if you haven't logged in in a while.\" Zillox, who specializes in opposition research for political candidates, does add this caveat: \"If you have patience and are willing to sift through a lot of stuff, some gems might still show up.\"  For this reason, he says, many people preparing to go into politics spend a lot of time trying to delete information from the Internet before they run for office. \"Older stuff might be gone, but a lot more new content is shared in multiple places,\" he says. \"If five, 10 copies of a picture are out there, chances are I'm going to find it.\"\nBut if you're not a political candidate, does being naked on the Internet even matter anymore? Maybe not, argues Anthony Rotolo, assistant professor of social media at Syracuse University. \"There's a half life to the stuff that we share on line, and it's really short,\" he says. \"The Internet lives on moments. It lives on what is viral right now, whether globally (like Justin Bieber getting arrested), or viral within your own social network. Then it's over very quickly. What we're seeing is that your naked pictures from 10 years ago are nowhere near as appealing as someone else's new naked pictures, which will be forgotten tomorrow anyway.\" \nRotolo credits Facebook with helping to foster this change. As recently as a decade ago, identities on the Internet were much more protected. It was seen as foolhardy to ever use your real name online, to the extent that people even had separate credit cards for their online purchases. Under those circumstances, it was easy to pretend that embarrassing Internet pictures were something that could never happen to the average person. Then Facebook came along, forcing everyone to use their real name. And in doing so, the blue F helped embarrassing Internet pictures become a normal part of being online. As Rotolo puts it, \"Facebook made us realize that anyone claiming they haven't done embarrassing things on the Internet is probably lying.\""^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://mashable.com/2014/02/08/internet-photos-disappear/>