<http://schema.org/articleBody>
" Sooner or later, it has to dawn even on the people at The Washington Post, that Jennifer Rubin has descended into a low form of performance art. Clinton&amp;#039;s problems are one of many reasons why a GOP governor would match up especially well against her. These are people who took charge and accepted responsibility, dealt with natural disasters and stubborn bureaucracies. (The governors most likely to run are perfectly positioned to say things like, &amp;quot;You didn&amp;#039;t get the memo pleading for more security in Libya? You must be joking! What kind of shop were you running over there? I always made sure the most important issues got to my desk. It&amp;#039;s executive skills 101.&amp;quot;) Don&amp;#039;t get me wrong. Chances are overwhelming she&amp;#039;ll be the nominee. But Democrats might begin to fret that she&amp;#039;ll be a hobbled one, someone (along with Vice President Joe Biden) burdened by a record and hampered in separating from an administration gasping for breath. Maybe that is why Republicans are coming around to the idea that Clinton is the perfect opponent for them to confront in 2016. Personally, I think it&amp;#039;s a new type of office pool gambling among Republican operatives. Let&amp;#039;s see which one of us today can get produce the stupidest idea that Jennifer Rubin will put into print. $10 bucks an entry, winner take all. Whoever thought this one up today should get double their money back. "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a19972/washington-post-jennifer-rubin-on-hillary-clinton-120913/>