<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Google Instant is just a few hours old, but in \"technology years,\" it's already reached the awkward adolescent stage in which it is mercilessly judged by others.\nWe were present at Google's unveiling of this new approach to search, which Google reps have dubbed \"one part art, one part science.\" The feature itself, from the user experience side of things, is one part text prediction, one part instant search results.\nSome of us have been pretty impressed with the new technology. \"With one keystroke, 'w,' you\u2019ll instantly get your weather forecast,\" wrote our own Ben Parr this morning. \"Wow.\"\nOn his personal blog, Google search god Matt Cutts explains why these UI changes help make Google search faster.\n\"If we want to get people answers and solve their problems faster, we can help with that by improving our UI to help you formulate queries more quickly (and then doing a bunch of hard work under the hood to answer that query too). Google typically returns search results in milliseconds, but it takes several seconds for you to type a query. In other words, the limiting factor on a typical search is you.  With predictive search and instant results, you can often get the answer you want much faster.\"\nNevertheless, some among us have been less enthusiastic about the alphabet according to Google. Let's face it: Sometimes, you know what you want to search for, and all the extra information can be a bit distracting, especially for the more ADD-prone technophiles out there.\nSo, what's your opinion of Google Instant so far?\n\n\n\n\tDo you like Google Instant?online survey\n\n\n\nThe poll will close Friday, September 10, at 10 p.m. PDT. Be sure to cast your vote by then, and let us know how you really feel in the comments, as well."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://mashable.com/2010/09/08/google-instant-poll/>