<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"I'm totally opposed to Twitter adding new features.  They're not needed.  A fancy Plurk-like timeline?  No need.  Tagging?  Why bother?  Polling?  Shrug.\nAnd yet there's one feature we can all agree Twitter needs: groups.  So much, in fact, that every new service offering some kind of Twitter grouping gets a mountain of buzz.  The latest to catch our attention: the inventively-named \"Twitter Groups\", hosted at TwittGroups.com.  It's technically unimpressive, however: all you can really do is join a group of people interested in similar things and view the Twitter Search results for that group (something you could easily do by using a shared hashtag).  \nThe fact that anyone even signs up for such a service is testament to an undeniable fact: Twitter needs groups.  As soon as that feature is added - and Twitter is working on it - all these half-baked attempts will be rapidly swept aside."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://mashable.com/2008/12/06/twitter-groups-2/>