<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Let&amp;#8217;s look at the question of who got the ball rolling in the case of the missing iPhone\n\n\n  \nJason Chen with prototype. Credit: Gizmodo\nJudging from reader comments, it&amp;#8217;s clear that a lot of people following the story of the lost iPhone prototype assume that the California police task force launched their investigation &amp;#8212; and raided the home of Jason Chen, the Gizmodo editor who ended up with the device &amp;#8212; because Apple \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\tAAPL\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t asked them to.\nIn a piece posted Monday, Yahoo News&amp;#8217; John Cook comes close to accusing Apple &amp;#8212; and indeed, Steve Jobs himself &amp;#8212; of orchestrating the probe based on the fact that Apple is one of 25 companies that sit on the steering committee of the police task force.\n&amp;#8220;Which raises the question,&amp;#8221; he writes, &amp;#8220;as to whether Apple, which was outraged   enough about Gizmodo\u2019s $5,000 purchase of the lost iPhone for CEO   Steve Jobs to reportedly call Gawker Media owner Nick Denton to   demand its return, sicked its high-tech cops on Chen.&amp;#8221;\nCook, who wrote for Gawker before he joined Yahoo, may be in a position to know whether Jobs called his former boss. But he can only speculate about Apple&amp;#8217;s role in the investigation.\n\n&amp;#8220;My inbox is chockablock with messages from those who think Apple  initiated this,&amp;#8221; writes Daring Fireball&amp;#8217;s John Gruber, who has been one of Apple&amp;#8217;s biggest defenders throughout the affair. He maintains that Cook &amp;#8212; and the readers who think like him &amp;#8212; have it all wrong.\n&amp;#8220;This is a criminal investigation, not  a civil lawsuit,&amp;#8221; he writes. &amp;#8220;Apple gets to decide whether to file civil litigation.  The San Mateo district attorney gets to decide whether to launch a  criminal investigation. We don\u2019t know yet whether Apple has been in  contact with the DA, but, why wouldn\u2019t they? They can tell the DA what  happened. They can\u2019t order the DA what to do.&amp;#8221;\nWhich leaves open the question of whether Apple ever asked the authorities to look into the matter. We put that question to Apple public relations four days ago. We have yet to receive a reply.\nUPDATE: A sharp-eyed reader points out that the \n  Wall Street Journal\n Monday quoted a deputy district attorney saying that Apple contacted authorities and &amp;#8220;advised [them] there had been a theft,&amp;#8221;  which, according to the Journal, led to the search warrant and the investigation.\nUPDATE 2: San Mateo County chief deputy DA Steve Wagstaffe offered more detail about Apple&amp;#8217;s role in an interview Tuesday with the\n   San Jose Business Journal\n:\n&amp;#8220;Wagstaffe said that an outside counsel for Apple, along with Apple  engineer [Gray] Powell, called the District Attorney\u2019s office on Wednesday or  Thursday of last week to report a theft had occurred and they wanted it  investigated. The District Attorney\u2019s office then referred them to the  Rapid Enforcement and Allied Computer Team, or REACT, a  multi-jurisdictional, high-tech crime task force that operates under the  Santa Clara County District Attorney\u2019s office.&amp;#8221;\nSee also:\n\nPolice raid Gizmodo editor&amp;#8217;s home\nLost    iPhone: The cops are on the case\nApple    wants its secret iPhone back\nLetterman&amp;#8217;s   Top 10: Excuses for the guy who lost Apple&amp;#8217;s top secret iPhone\n\n[Follow Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Twitter @philiped]"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://fortune.com/2010/04/27/did-apple-call-the-cops-on-gizmodo/>