<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Apparently, the bedhead look that has been popping up on stars a lot recently (even in dressy situations) is here to stay. In fact, many of the hairstylists this Fashion Week are taking it a step further with the goal of making the hair appear as if it&amp;#39;s the second, third or, hey, even fifth day after a washing. I&amp;#39;ve been hearing the words &amp;quot;lived-in&amp;quot; being thrown around as the official way to describe the look, which I have to admit is a bit more appealing than &amp;quot;dirty&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;messy,&amp;quot; but is that enough to get you onboard?\nHere&amp;#39;s the look at Jill Stuart:\nPinterestFacebookPHOTO: 2009 Getty ImagesAgain at Ohne Titel:\nPinterestFacebookPHOTO: 2009 Chris Moore/CatwalkingAnd here&amp;#39;s the tamest version at Ruffian (which was meant to look like a blow out that has been slept on):\nPinterestFacebookPHOTO: Copyright 2006I&amp;#39;m not sure how I feel about it. On one hand, it&amp;#39;s kind of hot in a relaxed, comfortable sort of way. On the other, it sort of looks like the kind of thing that I&amp;#39;d see in pictures later and feel embarrassed about. In the end, I might just get on the bandwagon though&amp;#8212;anything that allows me to hit the snooze button one more time usually ends up winning with me.\nWhat do you think: __Are these looks messy or sexy? Do you like the idea of &amp;quot;lived-in&amp;quot; hair? Find the whole thing lazy and off-putting? __\nOh, and be sure to check out the most genius use of hairpins I&amp;#39;ve ever seen at a fashion show. It&amp;#39;s amazing.\nPhoto: Getty Images for IMG, Getty Images"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.glamour.com/story/fall-trend-forecast-livedin-ha>