<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"                      <p class=\"imgtitle\">Blumenthal</p>           HARTFORD, Conn. - Statewide competition in cable television is what Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal says is what he would like to see after requesting AT&T be required to obtain a cable license for its Internet television service.<br /><br />Blumenthal filed an emergency petition Monday with the Department of Public Utility Control, citing a recent federal court ruling that says AT&T's Internet Protocol Television service is cable television.<br /><br />That federal ruling, Blumenthal says, nixes changes to state law that weakened the regulation of cable TV. IPTV is a system where digital television service is delivered by Internet Protocol over a network infrastructure.<br /><br />\"We are seeking to enforce a new era of cable competition,\" Blumenthal said. \"The first steps are an emergency order that would stop AT&T from constructing new facilities and signing up new customers until it has a franchise.\"<br /><br />Blumenthal claims the industry has received a turning point that could lead to lower cable prices and better service if the DPUC grants his petition. Since AT&T serves most of the state, it should have to provide its IPTV to all households, he added. The company offers the service in a few communities.<br /><br />\"AT&T can no longer cherry-pick the wealthiest and most accessible customers while denying most consumers the benefits of competition,\" he said.<br /><br />\"The federal court ruling -- that IPTV is cable and must be licensed and regulated as cable -- should mean real competition. I have asked the DPUC to immediately order that AT&T must have a license for its IPTV service, assuring a competitive market for cable. I urge AT&T to embrace this decision and seek a statewide franchise, a win-win for the company and consumers. The company can expand into the entire state, and consumers will see the benefits of competition,\" Blumenthal said.<br /><br />\"This ruling nullifies a recent misguided state statute that eviscerates consumer protections for cable customers. Cable and IPTV operators remain subject to common sense consumer protection and public service requirements.\"<br /><br />"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://legalnewsline.com/stories/510518419-internet-tv-should-be-regulated-like-cable-blumenthal-says>