<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"   Well, ladies, the latest cover of French Vogue has got some man bush going on.  No matter if male model Jarrod Scott does it for you or not, you gotta at least admire the mag for being all carefree in the man-pube department, right? It&amp;#039;s not often you see a pocket square juxtaposed with exposed male bush.  A photo like this, of course, warrants a very serious discussion: Is male bush a turn-on? I mean, I am majorly digging Scott&amp;#039;s upper penis muscles and chiseled abs (hot), but I&amp;#039;m not so sure about all that down-there hair. (Maybe if this was Jon Hamm, I&amp;#039;d feel differently, though he&amp;#039;s sadly no longer allowing below-the-belt photos.)  Personally, I&amp;#039;d prefer to not play &amp;quot;find the penis&amp;quot; within a dude&amp;#039;s ginormous man bush. That said, no hair down there can kinda of make a dude look like an androgynous Ken doll. So, I think I fall somewhere in the middle of the male pubic mane spectrum: The hair should be longer than just stubble\u2014so it it&amp;#039;s not all spiky on my tender lady parts\u2014but short enough so it can&amp;#039;t get caught in a dude&amp;#039;s jeans every time he zips up.  But, we want to hear from you: Is Scott&amp;#039;s man bush kinda hot, or kinda grody? How much bush do you like your man to have?  Want more from Natasha? Follow her on Twitter or find her on Facebook. Photo: Vogue International "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/news/a12321/jarrod-scott-french-vogue/>