<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"      I&amp;#039;m not sure what the people now occupying Wall Street ultimately will accomplish, but I&amp;#039;m a little tired with the argument that, because we don&amp;#039;t know what they may or may not accomplish, the entire exercise is doomed and useless. There has to be something to be said for people who at least direct their anger at the people who deserve it. The president has not been interested in doing that, unless he&amp;#039;s been flogging Tim Geithner in the solarium without our being aware of it. The Democratic party doesn&amp;#039;t seem overly concerned any more. Among the Republican presidential candidates, the issue is largely invisible, except when one of the candidate stands up courageously and applies a soothing balm to millionaires whose fee-fees have been wounded because the president has taken to talking about them in less than complimentary ways. For example, there is nothing that proves the essential fraudulence of the trope that the Tea Party &amp;quot;Movement&amp;quot; is some sort of spontaneous uprising, and not simply the well-funded re-branding of right-wing Republicanism aimed at a new crop of rubes, than the fact that there is little or no Tea Party presence on Wall Street. That is where the people who created the financial crisis work. That&amp;#039;s the scene of the crime. The wreckage of so many lives emanates from there, not from Washington. But the Tea Party is far more concerned with making sure that the Kenyan usurper in the White House gets run out of town on a rail, and the Tea Party&amp;#039;s heroes are roaming the landscape, talking rot, while the real villains are still yapping about how hard things are all over the place. Thank Whoever that there&amp;#039;s at least a few people who will stand outside of the right buildings and yell. "^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a11021/occupy-wall-street-tea-party-6499796/>