<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Although we aren't inclined to believe that this is the first time such a suit has been brought upon Apple, a new one claiming that the Cupertino powerhouse has unlawfully tied the iPod to its iTunes Store has made its way to the US District Court for the Southern District of California. The complaint was filed by a Florida resident on behalf of all Florida-based iPod owners and iTunes Store customers, and it basically alleges that certain limitations -- such as the inability to play content purchased through iTunes on anything not labeled an iPod -- is \"unreasonable and illegal under Florida's antitrust and unfair trade laws.\" Furthermore, the plaintiff claims that Apple willfully disabled embedded support for rival formats, and stated that it was \"in possession of monopoly power in the portable digital media player market, the online music market and the online video market.\" 'Course, it's not like those lawyers at 1 Infinite Loop aren't used to this stuff by now, and we really can't see this being the beginning of the end (nor a catalyst for rule changes) for the oh-so-mighty iTunes Store."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/lawsuit-claims-ipod-itunes-bond-is-monopolistic/>