The US Defence Department says it will not reopen investigations into alleged Vietnam War atrocities, despite new claims.
The Pentagon says there is no justification for reopening the case
According to an investigation by the Ohio-based Toledo Blade newspaper, the elite Tiger Force unit of the Army's 101st Airborne Division killed hundreds of unarmed villagers over seven months in 1967.
Soldiers told the newspaper they had severed ears from the dead, stringing them on shoelaces to wear around their necks, and had dropped grenades into bunkers where children and women were taking refuge.
But a Pentagon statement said the case was more than 30 years old and there was no new or compelling evidence to justify reopening it.
An earlier investigation had been closed in 1975, even though it had established that members of the unit had committed war crimes.
The Blade for eight months reviewed
thousands of classified army documents, national archive
records and radio logs and interviewed former members of
the unit and relatives of those who died.
Based on interviews with former Tiger Force soldiers it estimated the unit killed hundreds of unarmed people.
In one incident, two partially blind men found wandering in a valley were shot dead, records show.
Platoon members had opened fire on 10 elderly farmers, killing four, on approaching a rice paddy.
"We didn't expect to live. Nobody out there with any
brains expected to live. The way
to live is to kill because you don't have to worry about
anybody who's dead," William Doyle, a former Tiger Force sergeant now living in Missouri, told the newspaper.
Tiger Force, a unit of 45 volunteers, was created to spy
on North Vietnamese forces in South Vietnam's central
When the army investigation of the unit's alleged atrocities took place only three members were on active duty, said US army
spokesman Joe Burlas.
The only way to prosecute the soldiers was under
court-martial procedures, which apply only to active
military members, he said.
Commanders, acting on the
advice of military attorneys, determined there was not
enough evidence for successful prosecution.
Legal experts say former platoon members could still be prosecuted or sanctioned by the army but that this is unlikely because of the time that has elapsed.