Battle of Orgreave ex-officer calls for police conduct inquiry
An ex-policeman who was on duty during one of the most violent clashes of the 1984 miners' strike wants an inquiry into how police handled its aftermath.
Tony Munday says he was told by senior officers what to write in a statement after clashes on 18 June 1984, known as the Battle of Orgreave.
Fifteen miners, who worked at Orgreave, went on trial but the case failed because evidence was deemed unreliable.
Mr Munday has told the BBC miners now should "have justice seen to be done".
The South Yorkshire force referred itself to the watchdog, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) after a BBC documentary claimed officers may have colluded in writing court statements.
That followed a BBC Inside Out programme, which clamed its officers were told what to write in their statements, following clashes at Orgreave.
The IPCC said it understood the frustrations in the time it was taking to reach a decision on whether such an inquiry should take place.
Mr Scargill obtained a "hit list" of mines the Thatcher government was planning to close.
The Home Office said it would be inappropriate to comment while the (IPCC) investigation is ongoing.
Officers were drafted in to police the pickets lines from forces across the country.
Now Mr Munday, who served with the Hertfordshire force, has said he was told what to put in his statement "by a senior South Yorkshire detective" after he arrested a miner during the Orgreave confrontation.
"I've never before or since, while I've been a police officer, been involved where effectively chunks of a statement were dictated. They weren't my words," he said.
He agreed an inquiry should look at police conduct during the Orgreave clashes and their aftermath, as well as the subsequent trial.
"Orgreave is symbolic, it's symbolic of the whole miners' strike," he said.
"So I think it's appropriate particularly I think to repair trust, confidence and if there are issues of accountability wherever they are then that ought to be dealt with because policing needs to be appropriately embedded.
"If there's this demand from miners, well, they're citizens and they are entitled to have justice seen to be done.
"If for no other reason than to help them get some closure then, absolutely, I'd be very supportive of that [inquiry]."
Michael Mansfield, QC, who represented some of the miners at court after their 1984 arrests said he wanted the IPCC to reach a decision on an inquiry.
He said: "My concern is all they're doing is looking to see if there's a case to be referred for a full investigation.
"That does not take from 2010 to now - nothing."