Wzrost średnich temperatur na świecie wynika z przyczyn naturalnych
Wzrost średniej globalnej temperatury jest najbardziej dostrzegalnym symptomem zmiany klimatu. Teoretycznie jego przyczyną mogłyby być naturalne ...
trwale przekroczony
Dekadowe tempo globalnego ocieplenia związanego z ludzką działalnością zostało określone na 0,26°C, co oznacza że próg globalnego ocieplenia 1,5°C, o którym mowa w Porozumieniu Paryskim, zostanie <anchor>trwale przekroczony</anchor> przed upływem lat 20-tych XXI wieku.
Approaching 1.5 °C: how will we know we’ve reached this crucial warming mark?
Approaching 1.5 °C: how will we know we’ve reached this crucial warming mark?

[Skip to main content](#content)

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.

Advertisement

[![Nature](https://media.springernature.com/full/nature-cms/uploads/product/nature/header-86f1267ea01eccd46b530284be10585e.svg)](/)

- [View all journals](https://www.nature.com/siteindex)
- [Search](#search-menu)
- [Log in](https://idp.nature.com/auth/personal/springernature?redirect_uri=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03775-z)

- [Explore content](#explore)
- [About the journal](#about-the-journal)
- [Publish with us](#publish-with-us)
- [Subscribe](/nature/subscribe)

- [Sign up for alerts](https://idp.nature.com/auth/personal/springernature?redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Fmy-account%2Falerts%2Fsubscribe-journal%3Flist-id%3D1%26journal-link%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.nature.com%252Fnature%252F)
- [RSS feed](https://www.nature.com/nature.rss)

1. [nature](/)
2. [comment](/nature/articles?type=comment)
3. article

Approaching 1.5 °C: how will we know we’ve reached this crucial warming mark?


[Download PDF](/articles/d41586-023-03775-z.pdf)

- COMMENT
- 01 December 2023

# Approaching 1.5 °C: how will we know we’ve reached this crucial warming mark?

Assessing global mean temperature rise using the average warming over the previous one or two decades will delay formal recognition of when Earth breaches the Paris agreement’s 1.5 °C guard rail. Here is what’s needed to avoid the wait.


By


 - [Richard A. Betts](#author-0) [0](#Aff0),
- [Stephen E. Belcher](#author-1) [1](#Aff1),
- [Leon Hermanson](#author-2) [2](#Aff2),
- [Albert Klein Tank](#author-3) [3](#Aff3),
- [Jason A. Lowe](#author-4) [4](#Aff4),
- [Chris D. Jones](#author-5) [5](#Aff5),
- [Colin P. Morice](#author-6) [6](#Aff6),
- [Nick A. Rayner](#author-7) [7](#Aff7),
- [Adam A. Scaife](#author-8) [8](#Aff8) &
- …
- [Peter A. Stott](#author-9) [9](#Aff9)

Show authors

01. [Richard A. Betts](mailto:richard.betts@metoffice.gov.uk)

    1. Richard A. Betts is head of climate impacts research at the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, and a professor at the Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Richard+A.+Betts)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Richard A.+Betts) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Richard+A.%2BBetts%22)

02. Stephen E. Belcher

    1. Stephen E. Belcher is chief scientist at the Met Office, Exeter, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Stephen+E.+Belcher)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Stephen E.+Belcher) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Stephen+E.%2BBelcher%22)

03. Leon Hermanson

    1. Leon Hermanson is an expert scientist at the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Leon+Hermanson)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Leon+Hermanson) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Leon%2BHermanson%22)

04. Albert Klein Tank

    1. Albert Klein Tank is director of the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, and a professor in the School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Albert+Klein+Tank)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Albert+Klein Tank) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Albert%2BKlein+Tank%22)

05. Jason A. Lowe

    1. Jason A. Lowe is head of climate services at the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, and a professor in the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures, University of Leeds, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Jason+A.+Lowe)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Jason A.+Lowe) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Jason+A.%2BLowe%22)

06. Chris D. Jones

    1. Chris D. Jones is a research fellow at the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, and a professor in the School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Chris+D.+Jones)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Chris D.+Jones) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Chris+D.%2BJones%22)

07. Colin P. Morice

    1. Colin P. Morice is a senior scientist at the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Colin+P.+Morice)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Colin P.+Morice) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Colin+P.%2BMorice%22)

08. Nick A. Rayner

    1. Nick A. Rayner is head of climate monitoring at the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Nick+A.+Rayner)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Nick A.+Rayner) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Nick+A.%2BRayner%22)

09. Adam A. Scaife

    1. Adam A. Scaife is head of long-range forecasting at the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, and a professor in the Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Adam+A.+Scaife)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Adam A.+Scaife) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Adam+A.%2BScaife%22)

10. Peter A. Stott

    1. Peter A. Stott is a research fellow at the Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, and a professor in the Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, UK.


[View author publications](/search?author=Peter+A.+Stott)

You can also search for this author in [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Peter A.+Stott) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_sauthors=%22Peter+A.%2BStott%22)

- [Twitter](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Approaching+1.5+%C2%B0C%3A+how+will+we+know+we%E2%80%99ve+reached+this+crucial+warming+mark%3F&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fd41586-023-03775-z)
- [Facebook](http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fd41586-023-03775-z)
- [Email](mailto:?subject=Approaching 1.5 °C: how will we know we’ve reached this crucial warming mark?&body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fd41586-023-03775-z)

![People use umbrellas and parasols to seek relief from the heat while crossing a street in Tokyo](//media.nature.com/w767/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26464368.jpg)

People in Tokyo carried parasols for shade as temperatures exceeded 35 °C in the Japanese capital in July 2023. Credit: Richard A. Brooks/AFP via Getty

[Download PDF](/articles/d41586-023-03775-z.pdf)

The world is already more than 1 °C warmer on average than it was before industrial times, owing to greenhouse gases released from human activities. And that value is rising. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects that there is at least a 50% chance that long-term global warming will overshoot 1.5 °C in the next decade, even with ambitious emissions cuts.

That matters because this target is written into the 2015 Paris climate agreement. Breaching it will trigger questions on what needs to be done to meet the agreement’s goal — to curb human-induced climate change. For example, its aim of “pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C” would then mean taking action to reverse global warming, not just stopping it — a much greater demand. A breach will also inevitably prompt assessments of the observed impacts of exceeding 1.5 °C.

It might come as a surprise, then, to hear that the Paris statement contains no formally agreed way of defining the present level of global warming. The pact does not even define ‘temperature increase’ explicitly and unambiguously. Without an agreed metric, there can be no consensus on when the 1.5 °C level has been reached. This is likely to result in distraction and delay just at the point when climate action is most urgent.

[![](//media.nature.com/w400/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26473250.png)\
Is it too late to keep global warming below 1.5 °C? The challenge in 7 charts](https://www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-023-03601-6/index.html)

A key issue is that global temperatures do not increase smoothly. The brief ups and downs that occur over weeks to years owing to natural climate variability (caused, for instance, by El Niño events and the effects of gases given off by volcanic activity) are superimposed on the long-term warming trend from human influences. For example, the global mean temperature rise exceeded 1.5 °C briefly for a month or more in 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020 and 2023.

As far as the Paris agreement is concerned, it’s recognized that such brief warm spells don’t count as breaching 1.5 °C. And even an anomalously warm year would not do so. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) predicts there is a 66% chance that the global mean temperature excess will go above 1.5 °C for at least one year in the next 5 years[1](#ref-CR1). However, even this is likely to be a temporary anomaly.

What would count as passing 1.5 °C? A method is needed for filtering out such natural climate cycles. To smooth temperature wiggles in model projections of future climate, the latest IPCC assessment report, AR6, defined the 1.5 °C mark and other global warming levels (GWLs) in terms of projected 20-year averages relative to the average for 1850–1900. The year of exceedance of a GWL is the midpoint of the 20-year period at that level. By this definition, 1.5 °C of warming would be confirmed once the observed temperature rise has reached that level, on average, over a 20-year period — in other words, a decade after crossing the 1.5 °C level. That risks a delay in recognizing and reacting to the crossing point (see ‘Current global warming levels’).

![Current global warming levels. Line graph showing global mean temperature changes for observational and projection data. Policy makers need to know when the world reaches 1.5 degrees of warming.](//media.nature.com/lw767/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26473236.png)

Source: analysis by R. A. Betts _et al_.

Researchers and the policy community need to agree urgently on a metric for determining the current level of global warming for policy purposes. Once defined, the metric should be formally adopted for use in the context of the Paris agreement. It should be consistent with established IPCC practices, and should allow the crossing of 1.5 °C to be recognized without delay. Here, we propose a starting point for such a metric.

## **Multiple metrics**

In observational records of climate, the average global temperature over the past two decades (2003–22) has been 1.03 °C above that for 1850–1900 (although uncertainties in the data mean that the true value could be as low as 0.87 °C or as high as 1.13 °C; see Supplementary information)[2](#ref-CR2). And measurements from 2002 to 2021 indicate that warming first passed 1 °C in 2011. But we don’t know what the 20-year average is now, centred around 2023.

Assuming the world stays on its current warming trajectory, IPCC projections suggest that 1.5 °C will be breached around 2030, give or take a decade[3](#ref-CR3). But, on the basis of 20-year averages, the passing of 1.5 °C would not be formally recognized until around 2040.

Shortening the period over which the average is calculated doesn’t help much. Ten-year averages[4](#ref-CR4) are reasonably representative of longer-term averages[5](#ref-CR5) and reduce the delay to five years. But that is still a long time when action is needed urgently. Shortening the average period further isn’t useful, because natural variability then dominates.

[![](//media.nature.com/w400/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26316404.png)\
Climate loss-and-damage funding: how to get money to where it’s needed fast](http://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03605-2)

A more instantaneous indicator of the current level of long-term warming is needed. Several such methods are already in use. These include: finding the end point of a linear trend over the past 30 years (see [go.nature.com/3ssvpwx](http://go.nature.com/3ssvpwx)); using more sophisticated methods for statistical smoothing over short time frames (see [go.nature.com/3mqsr7g](http://go.nature.com/3mqsr7g)); and calculating the human contribution to warming from data on changes in the concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols[6](#ref-CR6).

Each method can offer a slightly different estimate of current warming, depending on which data, algorithms and assumptions are used. Nonetheless, there is broad agreement on some things, such as that warming in 2022 was about 1.24 °C (with an uncertainty range between 1.0 °C and 1.6 °C), and that 1.0 °C warming was exceeded around 2011 or 2012.

There have been times when the differences between methods were greater, either because the rate of warming changed rapidly so a linear trend did not represent the long-term change, or because large natural variability led to a difference between the observed warming and the human contribution. For example, there is less agreement on the year in which 0.5 °C of warming was exceeded, put at some time between 1982 and 1988. This demonstrates the potential for confusion on recognizing the crossing of 1.5 °C if a single indicator is not agreed.

However, there are two key problems with using any of these indicators in the context of the Paris agreement. Both stem from the need for consistency with existing IPCC practice.

## **Informing policy**

First, to inform policy, the indicator for monitoring the approach to 1.5 °C must be future-proof — later changes in the definition could undermine the credibility of using GWLs for scientific advice. Any definition must be consistent with how 1.5 °C is already defined by the IPCC; that is, using 20-year averages attached to a midpoint.

![A diver underwater brings up threatened coral transplants from the Florida Keys waters](//media.nature.com/lw767/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26464374.jpg)

Corals were moved to land for safety when a July heatwave warmed waters near Florida.Credit: Carolyn Cole/Los Angeles Times via Getty

Second, the metric should be consistent with how the 1.5 °C level will be defined after it has retreated into the past — as a baseline for future impact assessments. The IPCC already uses long-term averages over recent decades for such baselines; it does not use the end point of 30-year trends or statistical smoothing. And, importantly, baseline periods for impact studies are defined in terms of observed temperature change, not calculations of human-induced warming, because the impacts depend on the actual temperature experienced.

The instantaneous metrics are inconsistent with these requirements. And the IPCC method alone will not suffice — 20 years of observed data will not be available in the exceedance year, because it is only halfway through the 20-year period. Another approach is needed.

## **A new approach**

We propose a new indicator — the 20-year average temperature rise centred around the current year. This is estimated by blending observations for the past 10 years with climate model projections or forecasts for the next 10 years, and taking an average over the combined 20-year period. This ‘current global warming level’ (CGWL) indicator meets our two criteria — it allows consistency with established IPCC definitions, and provides an instantaneous indicator of current warming.

[![](//media.nature.com/w400/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26316406.png)\
Climate loss-and-damage funding: a mechanism to make it work](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03578-2)

Testing this approach using different models and emissions scenarios, we have found that the CGWL centred on the end of 2022 is around 1.26 °C, with an uncertainty range from the forecasts of 1.13 °C to 1.43 °C, mainly owing to climate variability (see Supplementary information). Only a small part of the uncertainty comes from assumptions concerning emissions over the coming decade[7](#ref-CR7).

This estimate is in line with those from the existing instantaneous values, but our metric is more future-proof and consistent with the approaches that are already used to support the Paris agreement.

## **Next steps**

First, the international community needs to recognize the need for a single, agreed metric for crossing the 1.5 °C threshold and anticipate events leading up to it. This period will be marked by a series of milestones. These include: the first year with a global temperature anomaly above 1.5 °C in one or more data sets; the exceedance of 1.5 °C using various instantaneous indicators (including our CGWL metric); and, a decade later, confirmation that 1.5 °C had been exceeded in the IPCC 20-year average.

An instantaneous indicator for policy purposes will provide clarity that the first individual year at 1.5 °C will not count as breaching the Paris guard rail, and will reduce delays that would result from waiting until the end of the 20-year period.

Discussions on the nature of this indicator should start immediately.

We encourage the IPCC to tackle this issue in a Special Report ahead of its seventh assessment report (AR7), which is not expected to be published until about 2030 — by which time, global warming might already have exceeded 1.5 °C or be close to doing so.

[![](//media.nature.com/w400/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26352664.jpg)\
Disaster early-warning systems are ‘doomed to fail’ — only collective action can plug the gaps](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03510-8)

The IPCC should examine indicators such as ours in depth. If a suitable metric is agreed, a robust and transparent process for calculating and communicating it should be developed. It should make use of well-established sources and practices as far as possible. For example, observations could come from the WMO’s _State of the Global Climate_ report ( [go.nature.com/3qqngme](http://go.nature.com/3qqngme)), and projections or forecasts could use the IPCC’s assessed warming rates[8](#ref-CR8) and the WMO’s decadal forecasts.

Researchers will need to decide which pathway of future greenhouse-gas and aerosol concentrations should be used for the central estimate of the forecast. The choice will need careful communication, because it could be taken as a statement of an expected policy future, even though it actually makes little difference when compared with uncertainties caused by natural climate variability[7](#ref-CR7).

Uncertainties in the combination of observations and forecasts will need to be quantified more precisely, and a system for communicating them developed. For example, formal identification of the passing of 1.5 °C could be accompanied by an IPCC-style confidence or likelihood statement — such as ‘it is likely that the current global warming level has now reached (or exceeded) 1.5 °C’. In subsequent years, this might become ‘it is very likely that the CGWL exceeded 1.5 °C in year X’. This evaluation would become more certain as more observations came in over the following decade.

Other technical details remain to be discussed. These include whether the projection of the next ten years should include a specific forecast of natural variability (as in the WMO’s decadal forecasts), or whether the possible outcomes of variability should just be treated statistically.

We recommend that work commence urgently to develop a system to put this definition into use. Researchers must ensure that it is ready well before the controversy begins over whether global warming has exceeded 1.5 °C.

_Nature_ **624**, 33-35 (2023)

_doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03775-z_

## References

1. World Meteorological Organization. _Global Annual to Decadal Climate Update 2023–2027_ (WMO, 2023).

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Global%20Annual%20to%20Decadal%20Climate%20Update%202023%E2%80%932027&publication_year=2023)

2. Forster, P. M. _et al._ _Earth Syst. Sci. Data_ **15**, 2295–2327 (2023).

[Article](https://doi.org/10.5194%2Fessd-15-2295-2023) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=&journal=Earth%20Syst.%20Sci.%20Data&doi=10.5194%2Fessd-15-2295-2023&volume=15&pages=2295-2327&publication_year=2023&author=Forster%2CP.%20M.)

3. Arias, P. A. _et al_. in _Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change_ (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 35–144 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Climate%20Change%202021%3A%20The%20Physical%20Science%20Basis.%20Contribution%20of%20Working%20Group%20I%20to%20the%20Sixth%20Assessment%20Report%20of%20the%20Intergovernmental%20Panel%20on%20Climate%20Change&pages=35-144&publication_year=2021)

4. Gulev, S. K. _et al_. in _Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change_ (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 287–422 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Climate%20Change%202021%3A%20The%20Physical%20Science%20Basis.%20Contribution%20of%20Working%20Group%20I%20to%20the%20Sixth%20Assessment%20Report%20of%20the%20Intergovernmental%20Panel%20on%20Climate%20Change&pages=287-422&publication_year=2021)

5. Trewin, B. J. _Geophys. Res. Atmospheres_ **127**, e2022JD036747 (2022).

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1029%2F2022JD036747) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=&journal=Geophys.%20Res.%20Atmospheres&doi=10.1029%2F2022JD036747&volume=127&publication_year=2022&author=Trewin%2CB.%20J.)

6. Haustein, K. _et al._ _Sci. Rep._ **7**, 15417 (2017).

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41598-017-14828-5) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=29133863) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=&journal=Sci.%20Rep.&doi=10.1038%2Fs41598-017-14828-5&volume=7&publication_year=2017&author=Haustein%2CK.)

7. Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. _Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc._ **90**, 1095–1108 (2009).

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1175%2F2009BAMS2607.1) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=&journal=Bull.%20Am.%20Meteorol.%20Soc.&doi=10.1175%2F2009BAMS2607.1&volume=90&pages=1095-1108&publication_year=2009&author=Hawkins%2CE.&author=Sutton%2CR.)

8. Lee, J.-Y. in _Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change_ (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. _et al._) 553–672 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Climate%20Change%202021%3A%20The%20Physical%20Science%20Basis.%20Contribution%20of%20Working%20Group%20I%20to%20the%20Sixth%20Assessment%20Report%20of%20the%20Intergovernmental%20Panel%20on%20Climate%20Change&pages=553-672&publication_year=2021)


[Download references](https://citation-needed.springer.com/v2/references/10.1038/d41586-023-03775-z?format=refman&flavour=references)

[Reprints and permissions](https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?title=Approaching%201.5%20%C2%B0C%3A%20how%20will%20we%20know%20we%E2%80%99ve%20reached%20this%20crucial%20warming%20mark%3F&author=Richard%20A.%20Betts%20et%20al&contentID=10.1038%2Fd41586-023-03775-z&copyright=Springer%20Nature%20Limited&publication=0028-0836&publicationDate=2023-12-01&publisherName=SpringerNature&orderBeanReset=true)

### Supplementary Information

1. [Supplementary figure, table and notes](/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/26464484)

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Related Articles

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26473250.png)\
\
Is it too late to keep global warming below 1.5 °C? The challenge in 7 charts](https://www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-023-03601-6/index.html)

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26316404.png)\
\
Climate loss-and-damage funding: how to get money to where it’s needed fast](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03605-2)

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26316406.png)\
\
Climate loss-and-damage funding: a mechanism to make it work](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03578-2)

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26361472.jpg)\
\
Record-breaking heat set to hit Southern Hemisphere as summer begins](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03547-9)

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26352664.jpg)\
\
Disaster early-warning systems are ‘doomed to fail’ — only collective action can plug the gaps](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03510-8)


## Subjects

- [Climate change](/subjects/climate-change)
- [Policy](/subjects/policy)

## Latest on:

Climate change

[![Academics say flying to meetings harms the climate — but they carry on](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02965-7/d41586-024-02965-7_27684434.jpg)\
Academics say flying to meetings harms the climate — but they carry on\
\
News13 SEP 24](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02965-7)[![How to change people’s minds about climate change: what the science says](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02777-9/d41586-024-02777-9_27497318.jpg)\
How to change people’s minds about climate change: what the science says\
\
News06 SEP 24](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02777-9)[![Massive Attack’s science-led drive to lower music’s carbon footprint](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02835-2/d41586-024-02835-2_27620774.jpg)\
Massive Attack’s science-led drive to lower music’s carbon footprint\
\
Career Feature04 SEP 24](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02835-2)

Policy

[![US election debate: what Harris and Trump said about science](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02945-x/d41586-024-02945-x_27679102.jpg)\
US election debate: what Harris and Trump said about science\
\
News11 SEP 24](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02945-x)[Energy storage overcapacity can cause power system instability and blackouts, too\
\
Correspondence10 SEP 24](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02896-3)[Update regulator guidance to show that animal research really is no longer king\
\
Correspondence10 SEP 24](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02895-4)

## ![Nature Careers](/static/images/logos/nature-careers-logo-f6ff1c1c64.svg)

### [Jobs](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/)

- #### [Staff Scientist - Immunology](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/job/12829466/staff-scientist-immunology/?TrackID=62&utm_source=widget&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=62)





Staff Scientist- Immunology



Houston, Texas (US)



Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)





![](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/getasset/eb5c581a-539f-439b-a848-eb32e266d6f5/)

- #### [Institute for Systems Genetics, Tenure Track Faculty Positions](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/job/12829462/institute-for-systems-genetics-tenure-track-faculty-positions/?TrackID=62&utm_source=widget&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=62)





The Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU Langone Health has tenure track faculty positions (assistant professor level) at the new SynBioMed Center.



New York City, New York (US)



NYU Langone Health





![](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/getasset/cc0d8a26-f037-4d05-8311-034b118a3b87/)

- #### [Faculty Position](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/job/12829429/faculty-position/?TrackID=62&utm_source=widget&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=62)





The Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology (ICOB), Academia Sinica, Taiwan, is seeking candidates to fill multiple tenure-track faculty position



Taipei (TW)



Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica





![](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/getasset/43809e46-33b8-45a2-8042-88f97dab1b2b/)

- #### [Postdoctoral Associate](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/job/12829411/postdoctoral-associate/?TrackID=62&utm_source=widget&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=62)





Houston, Texas (US)



Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)





![](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/getasset/eb5c581a-539f-439b-a848-eb32e266d6f5/)

- #### [Associate or Senior Editor, Nature Energy](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/job/12829406/associate-or-senior-editor-nature-energy/?TrackID=62&utm_source=widget&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=62)





Job Title: Associate or Senior Editor, Nature Energy Location: New York, Jersey City, Philadelphia or London — Hybrid Working Application Deadline:...



New York City, New York (US)



Springer Nature Ltd





![](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/getasset/7387bab3-756d-4666-8199-d6e4d0b97d0f/)


[Download PDF](/articles/d41586-023-03775-z.pdf)

## Related Articles

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26473250.png)\
\
Is it too late to keep global warming below 1.5 °C? The challenge in 7 charts](https://www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-023-03601-6/index.html)

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26316404.png)\
\
Climate loss-and-damage funding: how to get money to where it’s needed fast](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03605-2)

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26316406.png)\
\
Climate loss-and-damage funding: a mechanism to make it work](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03578-2)

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26361472.jpg)\
\
Record-breaking heat set to hit Southern Hemisphere as summer begins](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03547-9)

- [![](//media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-023-03775-z/d41586-023-03775-z_26352664.jpg)\
\
Disaster early-warning systems are ‘doomed to fail’ — only collective action can plug the gaps](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03510-8)


## Subjects

- [Climate change](/subjects/climate-change)
- [Policy](/subjects/policy)

## Sign up to Nature Briefing

An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Email address

Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily _Nature Briefing_ email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the _Nature_ and Springer Nature Limited [Privacy Policy](https://www.nature.com/info/privacy).

Sign up

![](/u3ylqxs5/article/d41586-023-03775-z)

Close bannerClose

![Nature Briefing](/static/images/logos/nature-briefing-logo-n150-white-d81c9da3ec.svg)

Sign up for the _Nature Briefing_ newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Email address

Sign up

I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the _Nature_ and Springer Nature Limited [Privacy Policy](https://www.nature.com/info/privacy).

Close bannerClose

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. [Sign up for Nature Briefing](https://www.nature.com/briefing/signup/?brieferEntryPoint=MainBriefingBannerMagazine)

## Explore content

- [Research articles](/nature/research-articles)
- [News](/news)
- [Opinion](/opinion)
- [Research Analysis](/research-analysis)
- [Careers](/careers)
- [Books & Culture](/books-culture)
- [Podcasts](/nature/podcasts)
- [Videos](/nature/videos)
- [Current issue](/nature/current-issue)
- [Browse issues](/nature/browse-issues)
- [Collections](/nature/collections)
- [Subjects](/nature/browse-subjects)

- [Follow us on Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/Nature)
- [Follow us on Twitter](https://twitter.com/nature)
- [Subscribe](https://www.nature.com/nature/subscribe)
- [Sign up for alerts](https://www.nature.com/my-account/alerts/subscribe-journal?list-id=1)
- [RSS feed](https://www.nature.com/nature.rss)

## About the journal

- [Journal Staff](/nature/journal-staff)
- [About the Editors](/nature/editors)
- [Journal Information](/nature/journal-information)
- [Our publishing models](/nature/our-publishing-models)
- [Editorial Values Statement](/nature/editorial-values-statement)
- [Journal Metrics](/nature/journal-impact)
- [Awards](/nature/awards)
- [Contact](/nature/contact)
- [Editorial policies](/nature/editorial-policies)
- [History of Nature](/nature/history-of-nature)
- [Send a news tip](/nature/send-a-news-tip)

## Publish with us

- [For Authors](/nature/for-authors)
- [For Referees](/nature/for-referees)
- [Language editing services](https://authorservices.springernature.com/go/sn/?utm_source=For+Authors&utm_medium=Website_Nature&utm_campaign=Platform+Experimentation+2022&utm_id=PE2022)
- [Submit manuscript](https://mts-nature.nature.com/)

## Search

Search articles by subject, keyword or author

Show results fromAll journals

Search

[Advanced search](/search/advanced)

### Quick links

- [Explore articles by subject](/subjects)
- [Find a job](/naturecareers)
- [Guide to authors](/authors/index.html)
- [Editorial policies](/authors/editorial_policies/)

Nature ( _Nature_)
ISSN1476-4687 (online)
ISSN0028-0836 (print)


## nature.com sitemap

### About Nature Portfolio

- [About us](https://www.nature.com/npg_/company_info/index.html)
- [Press releases](https://www.nature.com/npg_/press_room/press_releases.html)
- [Press office](https://press.nature.com/)
- [Contact us](https://support.nature.com/support/home)

### Discover content

- [Journals A-Z](https://www.nature.com/siteindex)
- [Articles by subject](https://www.nature.com/subjects)
- [protocols.io](https://www.protocols.io/)
- [Nature Index](https://www.natureindex.com/)

### Publishing policies

- [Nature portfolio policies](https://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies)
- [Open access](https://www.nature.com/nature-research/open-access)

### Author & Researcher services

- [Reprints & permissions](https://www.nature.com/reprints)
- [Research data](https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data)
- [Language editing](https://authorservices.springernature.com/language-editing/)
- [Scientific editing](https://authorservices.springernature.com/scientific-editing/)
- [Nature Masterclasses](https://masterclasses.nature.com/)
- [Research Solutions](https://solutions.springernature.com/)

### Libraries & institutions

- [Librarian service & tools](https://www.springernature.com/gp/librarians/tools-services)
- [Librarian portal](https://www.springernature.com/gp/librarians/manage-your-account/librarianportal)
- [Open research](https://www.nature.com/openresearch/about-open-access/information-for-institutions)
- [Recommend to library](https://www.springernature.com/gp/librarians/recommend-to-your-library)

### Advertising & partnerships

- [Advertising](https://partnerships.nature.com/product/digital-advertising/)
- [Partnerships & Services](https://partnerships.nature.com/)
- [Media kits](https://partnerships.nature.com/media-kits/)
- [Branded\
content](https://partnerships.nature.com/product/branded-content-native-advertising/)

### Professional development

- [Nature Careers](https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/)
- [Nature\
Conferences](https://conferences.nature.com)

### Regional websites

- [Nature Africa](https://www.nature.com/natafrica)
- [Nature China](http://www.naturechina.com)
- [Nature India](https://www.nature.com/nindia)
- [Nature Italy](https://www.nature.com/natitaly)
- [Nature Japan](https://www.natureasia.com/ja-jp)
- [Nature Middle East](https://www.nature.com/nmiddleeast)

- [Privacy\
Policy](https://www.nature.com/info/privacy)
- [Use\
of cookies](https://www.nature.com/info/cookies)
- Your privacy choices/Manage cookies

- [Legal\
notice](https://www.nature.com/info/legal-notice)
- [Accessibility\
statement](https://www.nature.com/info/accessibility-statement)
- [Terms & Conditions](https://www.nature.com/info/terms-and-conditions)
- [Your US state privacy rights](https://www.springernature.com/ccpa)

[![Springer Nature](/static/images/logos/sn-logo-white-ea63208b81.svg)](https://www.springernature.com/)

© 2024 Springer Nature Limited