화성 이주 계획? "화성 오염시킬 수 있어" - 이웃집과학자
인간은 향후 10년 내 화성에 사람들을 이주시키려 하고 있습니다. 얼마 전 화성 탐사선 '인사이트'가 화성 착륙에 성공해 화성 탐사에 중요한 전기를 마련 ...
The Conversation
미국의 밴더빌트대학교 천문학과 교수인 David Weintraub가 < <anchor>The Conversation</anchor> >에 기고한 글에 따르면, 화성 표면에 인간이 발을 내딛게 되면 지구 생명체와 화성 생명체의 충돌은 불가피하다고 합니다. 물론 화성에 생명체가 아예 없다면 인간이 화성에 간다고 하더라도 도덕적으로 어떤 딜레마도 겪지 않을 겁니다.
Colonizing Mars means contaminating Mars – and never knowing for sure if it had its own native life![](https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1392960898182692
Colonizing Mars means contaminating Mars – and never knowing for sure if it had its own native life![](https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1392960898182692
    &ev=ViewContent
    &cd[content_name]=Colonizing Mars means contaminating Mars – and never knowing for sure if it had its own native life
    &cd[content_type]=content
    &cd[content_ids]=103053)

Menu

Close


- [Home](/us)
- [Arts + Culture](/us/arts)
- [Economy](/us/business)
- [Education](/us/education)
- [Environment + Energy](/us/environment)
- [Ethics + Religion](/us/ethics)
- [Health](/us/health)
- [Politics + Society](/us/politics)
- [Science + Tech](/us/technology)
- [Podcasts](/us/podcasts)
- [En Español](/us/espanol)

### Edition

Africa

Australia

Brasil

Canada

Canada (français)

España

Europe

France

Global

Indonesia

New Zealand

United Kingdom

United States


[![The Conversation](https://cdn.theconversation.com/static/tc/@theconversation/ui/dist/esm/logos/logo-en-b159aca2598f351db37072c75294e4c8.svg)](/us)

- [Home](/us)
- Edition:

[Available editions](/us)

United States

- [Africa](/africa "Africa edition")
- [Australia](/au "Australia edition")
- [Brasil](/br "Brasil edition")
- [Canada](/ca "Canada edition")
- [Canada (français)](/ca-fr "Canada (français) edition")
- [España](/es "España edition")
- [Europe](/europe "Europe edition")
- [France](/fr "France edition")
- [Global](/global "Global edition")
- [Indonesia](/id "Indonesia edition")
- [New Zealand](/nz "New Zealand edition")
- [United Kingdom](/uk "United Kingdom edition")

- [Donate](https://donate.theconversation.com/us?utm_source=theconversation.com&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=topbar)
- [Get newsletter](/us/newsletters?utm_campaign=System&utm_content=newsletter&utm_medium=TopBar&utm_source=theconversation.com "Sign up to receive our daily email newsletter")

- [Become an author](/become-an-author)
- [Sign up as a reader](/sign_up?return_to=%2Fcolonizing-mars-means-contaminating-mars-and-never-knowing-for-sure-if-it-had-its-own-native-life-103053)
- [Sign in](/sign_in?return_to=%2Fcolonizing-mars-means-contaminating-mars-and-never-knowing-for-sure-if-it-had-its-own-native-life-103053)

[![The Conversation](https://cdn.theconversation.com/static/tc/@theconversation/ui/dist/esm/logos/logo-en-b159aca2598f351db37072c75294e4c8.svg)](/us)Search

Academic rigor, journalistic flair


1. [Arts + Culture](/us/arts "Arts + Culture")
2. [Economy](/us/business "Economy")
3. [Education](/us/education "Education")
4. [Environment + Energy](/us/environment "Environment + Energy")
5. [Ethics + Religion](/us/ethics "Ethics + Religion")
6. [Health](/us/health "Health")
7. [Politics + Society](/us/politics "Politics + Society")
8. [Science + Tech](/us/technology "Science + Tech")
9. [Podcasts](/us/podcasts "Podcasts")

![](https://images.theconversation.com/files/242763/original/file-20181029-76411-ioau9b.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&rect=814%2C0%2C3775%2C2574&q=20&auto=format&w=320&fit=clip&dpr=2&usm=12&cs=strip)

Once people get there, Mars will be contaminated with Earth life.
[NASA/Pat Rawlings, SAIC](https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_261.html), [CC BY](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

# **Colonizing Mars means contaminating Mars – and never knowing for sure if it had its own native life**

Published: November 6, 2018 6:41am EST

David Weintraub, _Vanderbilt University_

### Author

1. [![](https://cdn.theconversation.com/static/tc/author/width170_default-bea415b3a0223821a698f6e3f6d5ab99.jpg)\
    David Weintraub](/profiles/david-weintraub-140129)

    Professor of Astronomy, Vanderbilt University



### Disclosure statement

David Weintraub does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

### Partners

[![Vanderbilt University](%3D)](/institutions/vanderbilt-university-1293)

[Vanderbilt University](https://theconversation.com/institutions/vanderbilt-university-1293) provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation US.

[View all partners](/us/partners)

![](https://cdn.theconversation.com/static/tc/content/translations-6981f1c1b8c1ca1c0da0dfc36aaad0e6.svg)

### Languages

- [Español](/colonizar-marte-significa-contaminar-marte-106627)
- English

[Email](mailto:?subject=Colonizing%20Mars%20means%20contaminating%20Mars%20%E2%80%93%20and%20never%20knowing%20for%20sure%20if%20it%20had%20its%20own%20native%20life%20%E2%80%94%20The%20Conversation&body=Hi.%20I%20found%20an%20article%20that%20you%20might%20like%3A%20%22Colonizing%20Mars%20means%20contaminating%20Mars%20%E2%80%93%20and%20never%20knowing%20for%20sure%20if%20it%20had%20its%20own%20native%20life%22%20%E2%80%94%20https%3A%2F%2Ftheconversation.com%2Fcolonizing-mars-means-contaminating-mars-and-never-knowing-for-sure-if-it-had-its-own-native-life-103053)

[X (Twitter)](http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Colonizing+Mars+means+contaminating+Mars+%E2%80%93+and+never+knowing+for+sure+if+it+had+its+own+native+life&url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconversation.com%2Fcolonizing-mars-means-contaminating-mars-and-never-knowing-for-sure-if-it-had-its-own-native-life-103053%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dbylinetwitterbutton&utm_campaign=none&via=ConversationUS)

[Facebook](http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconversation.com%2Fcolonizing-mars-means-contaminating-mars-and-never-knowing-for-sure-if-it-had-its-own-native-life-103053%3Futm_source%3Dfacebook%26utm_medium%3Dbylinefacebookbutton)

[LinkedIn](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&source=The+Conversation&summary=The+closest+place+in+the+universe+where+extraterrestrial+life+might+exist+is+Mars%2C+and+human+beings+are+poised+to+attempt+to+colonize+this+planetary+neighbor+within+the+next+decade.+Before+that+hap...&title=Colonizing+Mars+means+contaminating+Mars+%E2%80%93+and+never+knowing+for+sure+if+it+had+its+own+native+life&url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconversation.com%2Fcolonizing-mars-means-contaminating-mars-and-never-knowing-for-sure-if-it-had-its-own-native-life-103053%3Futm_source%3Dlinkedin%26utm_medium%3Dbylinelinkedinbutton)

[WhatsApp](whatsapp://send?text=Colonizing+Mars+means+contaminating+Mars+%E2%80%93+and+never+knowing+for+sure+if+it+had+its+own+native+life+https%3A%2F%2Ftheconversation.com%2Fcolonizing-mars-means-contaminating-mars-and-never-knowing-for-sure-if-it-had-its-own-native-life-103053%3Futm_source%3Dwhatsapp%26utm_medium%3Dbylinewhatsappbutton)

[Messenger](fb-messenger://share?link=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconversation.com%2Fcolonizing-mars-means-contaminating-mars-and-never-knowing-for-sure-if-it-had-its-own-native-life-103053%3Futm_source%3Dfb_messenger%26utm_medium%3Dbylinefb_messenger_button)

The closest place in the universe where extraterrestrial life might exist is Mars, and human beings are poised to attempt to colonize this planetary neighbor within the next decade. Before that happens, we need to recognize that a very real possibility exists that the first human steps on the Martian surface will lead to a collision between terrestrial life and biota native to Mars.

If the red planet is sterile, a human presence there would create no moral or ethical dilemmas on this front. But if life does exist on Mars, human explorers could easily lead to the extinction of Martian life. [As an astronomer](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=KOrEwdkAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao) who explores these questions in my book “ [Life on Mars: What to Know Before We Go](https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11233.html),” I contend that we Earthlings need to understand this scenario and debate the possible outcomes of colonizing our neighboring planet in advance. Maybe missions that would carry humans to Mars need a timeout.

## Where life could be

Life, scientists suggest, has some basic requirements. It could exist anywhere in the universe that has liquid water, a source of heat and energy, and copious amounts of a few essential elements, such as carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and potassium.

Mars qualifies, as do at least two other places in our solar system. Both [Europa](https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/moons/jupiter-moons/europa/in-depth/), one of Jupiter’s large moons, and [Enceladus](https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/moons/saturn-moons/enceladus/in-depth/), one of Saturn’s large moons, appear to possess these prerequisites for hosting native biology.

I suggest that how scientists planned the exploratory missions to these two moons provides valuable background when considering how to explore Mars without risk of contamination.

Cassini shot this false-color image of jets erupting from the southern hemisphere of Enceladus on Nov. 27, 2005.[NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute](https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/media/saturn_sponge.html), [CC BY](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Below their thick layers of surface ice, both Europa and Enceladus have global oceans in which 4.5 billion years of churning of the primordial soup may have enabled life to develop and take root. NASA spacecraft have even imaged spectacular geysers ejecting plumes of water out into space from these subsurface oceans.

To find out if either moon has life, planetary scientists are actively developing the [Europa Clipper mission](https://europa.nasa.gov/) for a 2020s launch. They also hope to plan future missions that will target Enceladus.

## Taking care to not contaminate

Since the start of the space age, scientists have taken the threat of biological contamination of other worlds seriously. As early as 1959, NASA held meetings [to debate the necessity of sterilizing spacecraft](https://www.nasa.gov/connect/ebooks/when_biospheres_collide_detail.html) that might be sent to other worlds. Since then, all planetary exploration missions have adhered to sterilization standards that balance their scientific goals with limitations of not damaging sensitive equipment, which could potentially lead to mission failures. Today, NASA protocols exist for the [protection of all solar system bodies](https://sma.nasa.gov/sma-disciplines/planetary-protection), including Mars.

Since avoiding the biological contamination of Europa and Enceladus is an extremely well-understood, high-priority requirement of all missions to the Jovian and Saturnian environments, their moons remain uncontaminated.

NASA’s [Galileo mission explored Jupiter](https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/galileo/overview/) and its moons from 1995 until 2003. Given Galileo’s orbit, the possibility existed that the spacecraft, once out of rocket propellant and subject to the whims of gravitational tugs from Jupiter and its many moons, could someday crash into and thereby contaminate Europa.

Such a collision might not occur until many millions of years from now. Nevertheless, though the risk was small, it was also real. NASA paid close attention to guidance from the [National Academies’ Committee on Planetary and Lunar Exploration](https://www.nap.edu/initiative/committee-on-planetary-and-lunar-exploration), which noted serious national and international objections to the possible accidental disposal of the Galileo spacecraft on Europa.

To completely eliminate any such risk, on Sept. 21, 2003, NASA used the last bit of fuel on the spacecraft to send it plunging into Jupiter’s atmosphere. At a speed of 30 miles per second, [Galileo vaporized within seconds](https://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/galileo_final.html).

Cassini’s ‘Grand Finale’ ended with the spacecraft burning up in Saturn’s atmosphere.

Fourteen years later, NASA repeated this protect-the-moon scenario. The [Cassini mission orbited and studied Saturn](https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/cassini/overview/) and its moons from 2004 until 2017. On Sept. 15, 2017, when fuel had run low, on instructions from NASA Cassini’s operators deliberately [plunged the spacecraft into Saturn’s atmosphere](https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/about-the-mission/summary/), where it disintegrated.

## But what about Mars?

Mars is the target of [seven active missions](https://mars.nasa.gov/#missions), including two rovers, [Opportunity](https://mars.nasa.gov/programmissions/missions/present/2003/) and [Curiosity](https://mars.nasa.gov/msl/mission/mars-rover-curiosity-mission-updates/). In addition, on Nov. 26 NASA’s [InSight mission](https://mars.nasa.gov/insight/) is scheduled to land on Mars, where it will make measurements of Mars’ interior structure. Next, with planned 2020 launches, both ESA’s [ExoMars rover](http://exploration.esa.int/mars/48088-mission-overview/) and NASA’s [Mars 2020 rover](https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/) are designed to search for evidence of life on Mars.

The Curiosity rover was tested under clean conditions on Earth before launch to prevent microbial stowaways.[NASA/JPL-Caltech](https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/msl20100913.html), [CC BY](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

The good news is that robotic rovers pose little risk of contamination to Mars, since all spacecraft designed to land on Mars are subject to [strict sterilization procedures before launch](https://www.nasa.gov/missions/solarsystem/mer_clean.html). This has been the case since NASA imposed “rigorous sterilization procedures” for the [Viking Lander Capsules](https://mars.nasa.gov/programmissions/missions/past/viking/) in the 1970s, since they would directly contact the Martian surface. These rovers likely have an extremely low number of microbial stowaways.

Any terrestrial biota that do manage to hitch rides on the outside of those rovers would have a very hard time surviving the half-year journey from Earth to Mars. The vacuum of space combined with exposure to harsh X-rays, ultraviolet light and cosmic rays would [almost certainly sterilize the outsides of any spacecraft](https://www.nasa.gov/connect/ebooks/when_biospheres_collide_detail.html) sent to Mars.

Any bacteria that sneaked rides inside one of the rovers might arrive at Mars alive. But if any escaped, the [thin Martian atmosphere](https://www.space.com/16903-mars-atmosphere-climate-weather.html) would offer virtually no protection from high energy, sterilizing radiation from space. Those bacteria would likely be killed immediately. Because of this harsh environment, life on Mars, if it currently exists, almost certainly must be hiding beneath the planet’s surface. Since no rovers have explored caves or dug deep holes, we have not yet had the opportunity to come face-to-drill-bit with any possible Martian microbes.

Given that the exploration of Mars has so far been limited to unmanned vehicles, the planet likely remains free from terrestrial contamination.

But when Earth sends astronauts to Mars, they’ll travel with life support and energy supply systems, habitats, 3D printers, food and tools. None of these materials can be sterilized in the same ways systems associated with robotic spacecraft can. Human colonists will produce waste, try to grow food and use machines to extract water from the ground and atmosphere. Simply by living on Mars, human colonists will contaminate Mars.

## Can’t turn back the clock after contamination

Space researchers have developed a careful approach to robotic exploration of Mars and a hands-off attitude toward Europa and Enceladus. Why, then, are we collectively willing to overlook the risk to Martian life of human exploration and colonization of the red planet?

Contaminating Mars isn’t an unforeseen consequence. A quarter century ago, a National Research Council report entitled [“Biological Contamination of Mars: Issues and Recommendations”](https://doi.org/10.17226/12305) asserted that missions carrying humans to Mars will inevitably contaminate the planet.

I believe it’s critical that every attempt be made to obtain evidence of any past or present life on Mars well in advance of future missions to Mars that include humans. What we discover could influence our collective decision whether to send colonists there at all.

Even if we ignore or don’t care about the risks a human presence would pose to Martian life, the issue of bringing Martian life back to Earth has serious societal, legal and international implications that deserve discussion before it’s too late. What risks might Martian life pose to our environment or our health? And does any one country or group have the right to risk back contamination if those Martian lifeforms could attack the DNA molecule and thereby put all of life on Earth at risk?

But players both public – NASA, United Arab Emirates’ [Mars 2117 project](https://government.ae/en/more/uae-future/2030-2117) – and private – [SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com/mars), [Mars One](https://www.mars-one.com), [Blue Origin](https://www.blueorigin.com) – already plan to transport colonists to build cities on Mars. And these missions will contaminate Mars.

Scientists hypothesize that dark narrow streaks were formed by briny liquid water – necessary for life – flowing down the walls of a crater on Mars.[NASA/JPL-Caltech/Univ. of Arizona](https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/7488/dark-recurring-streaks-on-walls-of-garni-crater/), [CC BY](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

[Some scientists believe they](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165243) [have already uncovered](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0131) [strong evidence for life on Mars](https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-finds-ancient-organic-material-mysterious-methane-on-mars), both past and present. If life already exists on Mars, then Mars, for now at least, belongs to the Martians. Mars is their planet, and Martian life would be threatened by a human presence there.

Does humanity have an inalienable right to colonize Mars simply because we will soon be able to do so? We have the technology to use robots to determine whether Mars is inhabited. Do ethics demand that we use those tools to answer definitively whether Mars is inhabited or sterile before we put human footprints on the Martian surface?

- [Planets](/topics/planets-146)
- [Mars](/topics/mars-178)
- [Extraterrestrial life](/topics/extraterrestrial-life-1453)
- [Opportunity rover](/topics/opportunity-rover-5850)
- [Mars rover](/topics/mars-rover-5851)
- [Life on Mars](/topics/life-on-mars-6975)
- [Space exploration](/topics/space-exploration-9492)
- [Enceladus](/topics/enceladus-9753)
- [Europa](/topics/europa-14808)
- [Curiosity Rover](/topics/curiosity-rover-17481)
- [ExoMars](/topics/exomars-25754)
- [Mars atmosphere](/topics/mars-atmosphere-25755)
- [Habitable planets](/topics/habitable-planets-39124)
- [Extraterrestrial](/topics/extraterrestrial-42157)
- [Insight Lander](/topics/insight-lander-49991)

### Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 189,700 academics and researchers from 5,044 institutions.


[Register now](/become-an-author)

- [Editorial Policies](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DUkhOcnF1Ef1MpuKtGr7rbBAawO4XV48)
- [Community standards](/us/community-standards)
- [Republishing guidelines](/us/republishing-guidelines)
- [Friends of The Conversation](/us/friends)
- [Analytics](https://analytics.theconversation.com/us)
- [Our feeds](/us/feeds)
- [Donate](https://donate.theconversation.com/us?utm_source=theconversation.com&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=footer)
- [Get newsletter](/us/newsletters?utm_campaign=System&utm_content=newsletter&utm_medium=Footer&utm_source=theconversation.com)

- [Who we are](/us/who-we-are)
- [Our charter](/us/charter)
- [Our team](/us/team)
- [Partners and funders](/us/partners)
- [Resource for media](/us/resources-for-media)
- [Contact us](/us/contact-us)
- [En Español](/us/espanol)

- [​](https://facebook.com/theConversationUS "The Conversation on Facebook")
- [​](https://twitter.com/ConversationUS "The Conversation on X (formerly Twitter)")
- [​](https://www.instagram.com/theconversationdotcom "The Conversation on Instagram")
- [​](https://www.linkedin.com/company/conversationus "The Conversation on LinkedIn")
- [​](https://newsie.social/@TheConversationUS "The Conversation on Mastodon")

[Privacy policy](/us/privacy-policy) [Terms and conditions](/us/terms-and-conditions) [Corrections](/us/corrections)

Copyright © 2010–2024, [The Conversation US, Inc.](https://theconversation.com/us/who-we-are)