Research objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Mudan granule combined with methylcobalamin in the treatment of type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy, providing the highest level of evidence of Mudan granule.~Experimental Measures and contrast: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,parallel- arm,and multi-centric clinical trial design was used on the basis of a co-regimen of methylcobalamin.The patients in the study group were treated with Mudan granule (7g 3 times/day for 24 weeks)and patients were treated with placebo (7g 3 times/day for 24 weeks) in the control group.The sample size was determined to 402 cases through statistics calculation.~Sample size calculation basis: According to the previous study of Mudan granule combined with methylcobalamin in the treatment of DPN with 12 weeks intervention, the results of the MDNS indicated that the study group (Mudan granule + methylcobalamin) scale score was 5.48±1.19, and the control group (placebo + methylcobalamin) scale score was 8.21 ±1.24, and the mean difference between the two groups was 2.73;Assuming that Mudan granule combined with methylcobalamin in the treatment of DPN can reduce the MDNS by 0.58 after 12 weeks of intervention, it is considered better than the control group.Taking α=0.05, β=0.10, the study group and the control group with 24 weeks intervention were allocated at a ratio of 1:1. The sample size calculated by the Power Analysis and Sample Size (PASS) 11 software was not less than 167 cases in each group. Considering no more than 20% withdrawal rate, the total number of cases is 402, 201cases in each group.~Research design 3.1 This trial was designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,parallel-arm, and multi-centric clinical trial. Subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the study group were treated with Mudan granule combined with methylcobalamin , and the patients in the control group were treated with placebo combined with methylcobalamin. The sample size was 402 cases.~3.2 The total intervention period is 24 weeks. 3.3 Curative effect evaluation criteria 3.3.1 Major evaluation indicators Changes in total score on the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS) of Scale,MDNS was recorded on the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score of Scale. The changes of MDNS were compared between the two groups before and after medication, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. The total score was 46, ranging from 0 (least severe) to 46 (most severe).~3.3.2 Secondary Evaluation Indicators~Changes in nerve conduction velocity,the changes in nerve conduction velocity of each nerve were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine,adopting the evaluation method of difference values.~Changes in corneal nerve fiber density of each mm2,the changes in corneal nerve fiber density of each mm2 were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values.~Changes in corneal nerve branch density of each mm2,the changes in corneal nerve branch density of each mm2 were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values.~Changes in corneal nerve fiber length of each mm2,the changes in corneal nerve fiber length of each mm2 were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values.~Changes in total score on the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) of Scale,toronto clinical score was recorded on the Toronto Clinical Scoring System(TCSS) of Scale. The changes of toronto clinical score were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. The total score was 19, ranging from 0 (least severe) to 19 (most severe).~Evaluation criteria of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM) syndromes efficacy score~①Clinical cure:TCM syndrome efficacy score reduced ≥90%.②Markedly effective: 90%>TCM syndrome efficacy score ≥70%.③Valid: 30% ≤ TCM syndrome efficacy score < 70%.④Invalid: TCM syndrome efficacy score reduced <30%.~Evaluation criteria of clinical symptoms score ①Disappearance: the symptoms disappeared,and the score was 0.②Improvement: the symptoms were relieved,and the score was reduced but not 0.③No improvement: the symptoms remained unchanged, and the score did not change.④Exacerbation: the symptoms exacerbated and the score increased.~3.4 Observation indicators~Demographic and clinical data:gender, age, disease course, family history,past medical history and so on (0 week).~Curative effect indicators：Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS) (0,12,24weeks),nerve conduction velocity (0 weeks, 24 weeks),corneal nerve fiber parameters (0,24 weeks),Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) (0,12,24 weeks),TCM syndromes efficacy (0,4,8,12,16,20,24 weeks).~Monitoring indicators~Fasting blood glucose, blood pressure (0,4,8,12,16,20,24 weeks).~Glycated hemoglobin, blood lipid (0, 12, 24 weeks).~Safety indicators~①Adverse events (recorded in detail at any time).~②General vital signs:body temperature, heart rate, respiration and so on(0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks).~③Blood routine, urine routine, urine pregnancy test, stool routine, 12-lead Electrocardiography, liver and kidney function test (0, 12, 24 weeks).~3.5 Basic treatment~Diabetes education.~Diabetic diet. ③Rational control of blood glucose: using oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin injections to keep all patients' blood glucose stable in the study. In principle, the type and dose of hypoglycemic agents should maintain unchanged. If fasting blood glucose fluctuates more than 20%,diabetes experts need to find and eliminate the predisposing factors as soon as possible, adjust the dose and monitor the blood glucose changes, so as to keep the blood glucose stable within 4 weeks.Adjusted dose of the drug needs to be detailed recorded in the combined medication table.~Taking methylcobalamin tablets (0.5mg,3 times/d). (Eisai (China) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.).~3.6 Provisions for combined treatment~①All Chinese herbal medicines with the same efficacy as the study drug (including Chinese herbal medicines with similar therapeutic indications and Chinese herbal medicines with similar efficacy) were banned during the study period.~②Besides methylcobalamin, drugs such as alpha lipoic acid, epalrestat, and VitB12 for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy are prohibited.~③All combination therapy and treatment (treatment measure or treatment medicine of other diseases) should be documented in the combined medication table.
Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common and disabling chronic microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetic Mellitus (T2DM) that is characterized by nerve damage, affecting at least half of patients diagnosed with diabetes. It has been reported that DPN significantly contributes to the increased morbidity with diabetic foot ulcers by 60% and amputation by 85% that seriously threaten the quality of life. Mudan granule, a traditional Chinese medicinal preparation, is widely used in clinical practice for DPN in China. Evidence from clinical and preclinical studies have shown that Mudan granule could relieve symptoms and reduce the incidence of DPN exacerbations. However, the previous studies are of variable quality and poorly standardized,which limits the clinical application of Mudan granule. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Mudan granule combined with methylcobalamin in the treatment of type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy, providing the highest level of evidence of Mudan granule.~Methods and design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,parallel-arm, and multi-centric clinical trial design was used based on a co-regimen of methylcobalamin. Subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the study group were treated with Mudan granule combined with methylcobalamin, and the patients in the control group were treated with placebo combined with methylcobalamin. The total intervention period is 24 weeks. The sample size was 402 cases.~Major evaluation indicators: Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS) changes, the changes of MDNS were compared between the two groups before and after medication, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. Secondary Evaluation Indicators:(1) nerve conduction velocity changes, the changes in nerve conduction velocity of each nerve were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. (2)corneal nerve fiber density changes, the changes in corneal nerve fiber density of each mm2 were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. (3)corneal nerve branch density changes, the changes in corneal nerve branch density of each mm2 were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. (4)corneal nerve fiber length changes, the changes in corneal nerve fiber length of each mm2 were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. (5)Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) changes, the changes of toronto clinical score were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. (6)Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM) syndromes efficacy score changes, the changes in TCM syndromes efficacy score were compared between the two groups before and after taking medicine, adopting the evaluation method of difference values. (7) Clinical symptoms score changes, the changes of each of clinical symptoms score were compared between the two groups before and after medication, adopting the evaluation method of difference values.~Discussion: We postulate that patients with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy will benefit from therapy with Mudan granule.