Temporary transcutaneous cardiac pacing is a life-saving procedure in patients with unstable bradycardia. The American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the management of unstable bradycardia recommend initiating transcutaneous pacing in patients unresponsive to atropine while addressing the primary cause of the bradycardia. The two most commonly described pacer pad application sites are the anterior-posterior (A-P) position (positive pad placed under the left scapula and negative pad placed on the left anterior lower chest wall) and the anterior-lateral (A-L) position (positive pad placed on the right anterior chest wall and negative pad placed on the left lower axilla). Major resuscitation organization (AHA, European, Australian) guidelines and text books of emergency medicine recommendations for pacer pad placement do not address the issue of which set of positions are preferred. There are no published human studies addressing ideal pacer pad placement. This study's objective is to assess if there is a significant difference in the pacing threshold (mA) between these two pacer pad positions. The study hypothesis is that the anterior-posterior position will require a lower current and cause less involuntary muscle contraction. The investigators plan to enroll volunteer human subjects undergoing elective cardioversion in the electrophysiology laboratory for atrial fibrillation/flutter. After successful cardioversion to a sinus rhythm, each subject will be transcutaneously paced to mechanical capture in both pacer pad positions. Optimal placement will be determined by the pad position with the lowest current required for capture. The conclusions of this study will provide evidence for the optimal choice regarding pacer pad placement, which can be used in future resuscitation guidelines.
Temporary transcutaneous cardiac pacing is a life-saving procedure in patients with unstable bradycardia. The American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the management of unstable bradycardia recommend initiating transcutaneous pacing in patients unresponsive to atropine while addressing the primary cause of the bradycardia. The two most commonly described pacer pad application sites are the anterior-posterior (A-P) position (positive pad placed under the left scapula and negative pad placed on the left anterior lower chest wall) and the anterior-lateral (A-L) position (positive pad placed on the right anterior chest wall and negative pad placed on the left lower axilla). Major resuscitation organization (AHA, European, Australian) guidelines and text books of emergency medicine recommendations for pacer pad placement do not address the issue of which set of positions are preferred. There are no published human studies addressing ideal pacer pad placement. This study's objective is to assess if there is a significant difference in the pacing threshold (mA) between these two pacer pad positions. The study hypothesis is that the anterior-posterior position will require a lower current and cause less involuntary muscle contraction. The investigators plan to enroll volunteer human subjects undergoing elective cardioversion in the electrophysiology laboratory for atrial fibrillation/flutter. After successful cardioversion to a sinus rhythm, each subject will be transcutaneously paced to mechanical capture in both pacer pad positions. Optimal placement will be determined by the pad position with the lowest current required for capture. The conclusions of this study will provide evidence for the optimal choice regarding pacer pad placement, which can be used in future resuscitation guidelines.