Introduction~Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a robust evidence base supports the beneficial effects of statin therapy on mortality and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes . Recently, two large trials , have demonstrated that compared to standard dose statin therapy, high statin doses reduced Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) to extremely low levels and decreased coronary events, even in patients with normal levels of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C). Subsequently, recent guidelines have suggested an Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) treatment goal of <70 mg/dL in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Achieving such low Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) levels frequently demands an intensive Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) reduction, often above 50%. Ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, can be used as an additional therapy if statin monotherapy fails to reduce Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) below the treatment goal.~Furthermore, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic pleiotropic effects of statins might explain, at least in part, the large benefits demonstrated in randomized trials , . For example, in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, a decrease in inflammation-associated markers such as the C-reactive protein (CRP) has been described , although it is debated whether this effect is clearly independent of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C).~Moreover, although inhibition of platelets by statin therapy is a well established effect , , it has not yet been clarified whether platelet inhibition by statin therapy depends on the reduction of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) or on the inhibition of intracellular signal pathways accompanied by disaggregating effects.~Two alternative pharmacologic strategies are equally effective in reducing Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C): high-dose statin alone and combined treatment with ezetimibe plus moderate-dose statin . It is not known whether these two strategies have different cholesterol-independent pleiotropic effects on inflammation and platelets. We therefore compared the anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects of two intensive pharmacologic strategies to reduce cholesterol: 80 mg of simvastatin (S80) versus 10 mg ezetimibe/ 20 mg of simvastatin (E10/S20). Anti-inflammatory effects were assessed by performing serial measurements of the following biomarkers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, oxidized Low-density lipoprotein-C (oxLDL), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1. Platelet aggregation was also compared between the two strategies.
Among patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not clear if the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol reduction differ between high-dose simvastatin alone and combined ezetimibe/simvastatin.~The investigators sought to compare the anti-inflammatory and anti-platelet effects of ezetimibe 10 mg / simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20) to simvastatin 80 mg (S80).