Although the number of deaths from gastric cancer has declined during the past, a large proportion of elderly patients are primarily affected by the disease. The definition of an elderly patient varies according to social and economic situations. However, in most developed and developing countries, 65 or 70 years of age is a commonly used limit because of the decreased role of the subject in the community and society.~Elderly cancer patients often suffer multiple comorbidities, take many medications, and have age-associated physiological problems, such as impaired organ function and functional changes, that make the selection of optimal treatment difficult. This aspect is also hampered by the underrepresentation of older patients in cancer clinical trials. Elderly patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria of clinical trials could experience the same advantages and toxicities from chemotherapy as younger patients. In contrast to physicians' perceptions, older patients do not recognize their age as an important issue for refusing trials [4]. Furthermore, performance status is not helpful to estimate the general condition of elderly patients, and other factors regarding their functional, social, and mental status should be considered [5].~Although the majority of gastric cancer patients are elderly, patients older than 65-70 years have been often excluded from, or underrepresented in, the study populations of combination chemotherapy trials.~There is, moreover, a lack of prospective studies directly comparing the outcomes and the tolerability of chemotherapy in young and elderly patients, although some data are available in gastric cancer from a retrospective analysis . Trumper et al. evaluated retrospectively 1,080 patients who were enrolled into three randomized controlled trias assessing 5-FU-based combination chemotherapy. They found that elderly patients obtained similar benefits from palliative chemotherapy in terms of symptomatic response, tumor regression, and survival, without increased toxicities.~In gastric cancer patients, oxaliplatin has shown a more favorable toxicity profile than cisplatin . A combination chemotherapy of 5-FU with oxaliplatin, mainly FOLFOX regimens, has been investigated in numerous phase II studies, using different doses and schedules, and has shown considerable antitumor activity. Insofar as toxicity is concerned, significant toxicities, including myelo-suppression and peripheral neuropathy, are a major issue for elderly patients. When compared to standard FOLFOX schedules, both weekly and biweekly reduced-dose combinations of oxaliplatin/5- FU without 5-FU bolus showed a more favorable toxicity profile with lower rates of peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression.~For the palliative treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, a doublet containing oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines could be considered as an option. Results from a prospective randomized trial showed the non-inferiority of oxaliplatin, as compared to cisplatin, in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, while decreasing toxicity. Of interest, a subgroup analysis from a phase III randomized trial reported significantly better results for elderly patients treated with oxaliplatin as compared to cisplatin. In this trial, patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomized to receive a 5-FU-based regimen with cisplatin (FLP regimen) or oxaliplatin (FLO regimen). The primary endpoint of the study, PFS, was unmet; however, in the subgroup of patients older than 65 years, the FLO regimen achieved improved efficacy in terms of response rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS) as compared with the FLP regimen.~In a previous study, we used a modified FOLFOX regimen with the omission of bolus 5-FU with the aim to improve tolerability of such regimen in the elderly population, while preserving the outcome. This strategy was adopted based on the results of previous and ongoing studies of oxaliplatin/5-FU combination regimens. We attained an overall response rate of 34.9 %, which compared favorably with other phase II studies of FOLFOX chemotherapy, ranging from 32.2 % to 52.5 % (see Table 5). This overall response rate was noteworthy if we consider that all the patients had metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer compared with other studies in which a variable percentage (from 8 % to 35 %) of enrolled patients had locally advanced disease. We observed no grade 4 toxicity, whereas grade 1-3 gastrointestinal toxicities were reported in a moderate number of patients. The modified FOLFOX (m FOLFOX) regimen showed a 9.3% occurrence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, which is lower than reported in other studies.~Capecitabine monotherapy was shown an effective maintenance treatment after chemotherapy with a favorable safety profile. In metastatic breast cancer, single-agent capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period, every 3 weeks. Short-course XELOX followed by capecitabine maintenance therapy, at a dose of 1,250 mg/m2 bid on d1-14 every 21 days until disease progression, provides an active and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. This approach minimises the risk of unwanted cumulative neurotoxicity, is cheaper and more convenient for both patients and healthcare providers.~Recently, fixed low-dose capecitabine (1,000 mg b.i.d.), administered continuously, has been administered to patients with gastrointestinal cancers with a high level of safety. Capecitabine 1,000 mg twice daily without interruption was used for the first 11 patients. The dose was reduced to 1,000 mg twice daily 5 days per week in 8 patients who developed hand-foot syndrome. Main toxicities were grade 1 to 2 fatigue and hand-foot syndrome.~The present study is aimed to collect data on progression free survival (PFS) of elderly population with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer, which are treated with the modified FOLFOX protocol followed by capecitabine maintenance. The aim of the present observational study is to assess if maintenance with capecitabine after a fixed number (8 cycles) of m FOLFOX regimen is able to prolong the PFS, with acceptable toxicity. In this case patients could achieve a safe treatment, sparing unnecessary combination-related toxicity (e.g. neurotoxicity, neutropenia, diarrhea and mucositis).
Elderly patients are generally underrepresented in the study populations of combination chemotherapy trials. In gastric cancer patients, oxaliplatin has shown a more favorable toxicity profile than cisplatin. A combination chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with oxaliplatin, mainly FOLFOX regimens, has been investigated in numerous phase II studies, using different doses and schedules, and has shown considerable antitumor activity. Insofar as toxicity is concerned, significant toxicities, including myelo-suppression and peripheral neuropathy, are a major issue for elderly patients. A modified FOLFOX regimen by omitting the administration of bolus 5-fluorouracil have shown a good profile of activity and tolerability in the elder population. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFOX (m FOLFOX) regimen for up to 8 cycles followed by capecitabine maintenance in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer and presenting associated disease(s)