Until recently, the tuberculin skin test (TST) was the only available diagnostic assay for detection of latent infection with M. tuberculosis (LTBI). Despite the low overall incidence of symptomatic tuberculosis infection in low-prevalence countries, the potential mortality and morbidity mandate constant vigilance to identify patients at risk for reactivation. Due to systemic immunosuppression, immunocompromised patients with latent M. tuberculosis infection are at increased risk of progression to active disease. This applies to patients with various causes of immunodeficiency such as HIV-infected patients, allogeneic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with chronic renal failure. Therefore, current guidelines aimed at preventing tuberculosis infection in immunocompromized individuals recommend a generalized screening for evidence of latent infection to target appropriate preventative prophylaxis. At present, tuberculosis control programs exclusively rely on the tuberculin skin test to identify a latent infection in asymptomatic individuals.~Recently, novel in vitro assays termed T cell interferon-gamma release assay (TIGRA) have become available that are based on the detection of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production in T cells or supernatants after stimulation with highly specific antigens of M. tuberculosis. Two TIGRA are commercially available, the ELISPOT based T.SPOT.TB and the ELISA based QuantiFERON-TB Gold test (now available as an IN-TUBE version). Current evidence suggests that TIGRA based on cocktails containing ESAT-6 and CFP-10 have the potential to become useful diagnostic tools. It has, however, been shown, that rates of indeterminate and positive results may differ between both tests, suggesting that they might provide different results in routine clinical practice. Moreover, there is only inadequate evidence on the value of those TIGRA in the management of immunocompromised individuals. Based on the current literature and most recent meta-analyses, there is an urgent need for head-to-head comparative studies of the two commercially available tests in immunocompromised patients. This study is designed to carry out a head-to-head comparison of the T.SPOT.TB and the ELISA based QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test with the TST in immunosuppressed populations. In a second step that will be addressed at a later stage, this study may be extended to longitudinally assess the predictive value of a positive blood test for progression to active disease.~The study will be performed within the tuberculosis network european trialsgroup (TBNET). It will be performed in a multicenter setting involving 23 participating centers from a total of 14 european countries. The study aims to include a total of 1800 study subjects distributed as follows: 200 HIV infected individuals with high and low CD4 T cells/µl (above and below 250 CD4 T cell/µl), respectively, 200 patients with chronic renal failure, 200 stem cell transplant recipients, 200 solid organ transplantation (lung, liver, kidney, kidney-pancreas) patients, 200 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, 200 immunocompromised patients with confirmed tuberculosis, 200 immunocompetent individuals with similar risk factors as patients, and 200 immunocompetent controls with no known risk of exposure or tuberculosis will serve as control groups.
Until recently, the tuberculin skin test (TST) was the only available diagnostic assay for detection of latent infection with M. tuberculosis (LTBI). Despite the low overall incidence of symptomatic tuberculosis infection in low-prevalence countries, the potential mortality and morbidity mandate constant vigilance to identify patients at risk for reactivation. Due to systemic immunosuppression, immunocompromised patients with latent M. tuberculosis infection are at increased risk of progression to active disease. This applies to patients with various causes of immunodeficiency such as HIV-infected patients, allogeneic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with chronic renal failure. Therefore, current guidelines aimed at preventing tuberculosis infection in immunocompromized individuals recommend a generalized screening for evidence of latent infection to target appropriate preventative prophylaxis. At present, tuberculosis control programs exclusively rely on the tuberculin skin test to identify a latent infection in asymptomatic individuals.~Recently, novel in vitro assays termed T cell interferon-gamma release assay (TIGRA) have become available that are based on the detection of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production in T cells or supernatants after stimulation with highly specific antigens of M. tuberculosis. Two TIGRA are commercially available, the ELISPOT based T.SPOT.TB and the ELISA based QuantiFERON-TB Gold test (now available as an IN-TUBE version).~The aim of the study is a prospective comparison of the two commercially available approved TIGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB) with the established Mendel-Mantoux skin-test in immunocompromized patients (main focus on sensitivity and specificity).~The study hypotheses are as follows:~In immunocompromised patients, the two commercially available approved TIGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB) have increased sensitivity and specificity as compared to the established Mendel-Mantoux skin-test.~Results from QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB do not differ in immunocompromised patients.