Among patients who are receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy, whether with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA), approximately 3-5% who require treatment interruption for a surgery will do so in an urgent/emergency surgery setting. Assuming that approximately 500,000 to 800,000 patients per year in the U.S. and E.U. will require perioperative management for a surgery/procedure, the investigators estimate that approximately 20,000 to 25,000 patients will require an urgent/emergency surgery. Although this represents a small proportion of patients who require anticoagulant interruption, there is considerable morbidity and mortality associated with DOAC/VKA management in an urgent/emergency surgery setting. Thus, for VKA-treated patients, rates of thromboembolism, major bleeding and mortality are 10.5%, 22.9%, and 2.9%, respectively. Similarly, for DOAC-treated patients who require an urgent/emergency surgery, rates of thromboembolism, major bleeding and mortality are 7.4%, 17.6%, and 1.5%, respectively. By comparison, rates of these outcomes for DOAC/VKA-treated patients who need elective surgery are ~0.5-1.0%, ~1-3%, and <0.5%, respectively. Most studies have focused on the perioperative anticoagulant management of patients who require an elective surgery/procedure. To the investigators' knowledge, few studies have focused on the assessment of adverse outcomes in an urgent/emergency perioperative setting among anticoagulated patients. Thus, this prospective registry study aims to 1) identify and compare determinants for perioperative adverse events in DOAC-treated and VKA-treated patients who require an urgent/emergency surgery, and to identify which of these are modifiable, and 2) describe and compare management of anticoagulant reversal (i.e., non-specific and specific reversal agents) and resource utilization (i.e., blood transfusion) in DOAC- and VKA-treated patients who need an urgent/emergency surgery. The data gained from this study will generate hypotheses for subsequent prospective studies that would potentially assess different management strategies in this clinical setting (e.g., use of DOAC antidote- vs. prothrombin complex concentrate-based management).~Given the exploratory, hypothesis-generating nature of the proposed study, the sample size is one of convenience, comprising 200 DOAC- and 200 warfarin-treated patients. Patients will be recruited from 30 clinical sites in Canada, the US, and Europe. With 30 clinical sites, the investigators estimate that 3-5 patients/month (60-72/yr) per arm can be recruited, corresponding to an overall rate of 180-216 over 3 years. Each study patient will participate for approximately 4 weeks, with one follow-up phone call at 4 weeks post-procedure.
Among patients who are receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy, whether with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA), approximately 3-5% who require treatment interruption for a surgery will do so in an urgent/emergency surgery setting. Additionally, there is considerable morbidity and mortality associated with DOAC/VKA management in an urgent/emergency surgery setting. Thus, this prospective registry study aims to identify and compare determinants for perioperative adverse events in DOAC-treated and VKA-treated patients who require an urgent/emergency surgery, and to identify which of these are modifiable. It also aims to describe and compare management of anticoagulant reversal (i.e., non-specific and specific reversal agents) and resource utilization (i.e., blood transfusion) in DOAC- and VKA-treated patients who need an urgent/emergency surgery.