Neonatal sepsis remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality both among term and preterm infants. Although advances in neonatal care have improved survival and reduced complications in preterm infants, sepsis still contributes significantly to mortality and in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).in particular for very-low-birth-weight (VLBW, <1500 g) and extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW, <1000g).The signs and symptoms of neonatal sepsis are non specific. These include fever or hypothermia, respiratory distress including cyanosis and apnea, feeding difficulties, lethargy or irritability, hypotonia, seizures, bulging fontanel... Based on the timing of the infection neonatal sepsis has been classified into early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset sepsis (LOS), with differences in the mode of transmission and predominant organisms. EOS is defined as onset in the first 3 days of life generally due to vertical transmission of bacteria from mothers to infants during the intrapartum period. LOS occurs after 3 days of life and it is attributed to pathogens acquired postnatally (horizontal transmission). The epidemiology of neonatal sepsis is a changing landscape, nevertheless an increasing rates of EOS Escherichia coli sepsis, particularly among preterm infants, and Streptococcus group B (GBS), in particular S. agalactiae, - resulted to be 70% of the responsible microorganisms, In a study on 6215 infants admitted to National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network (NRN) centres, 70% of first episode late-onset infections were caused by gram-positive organisms, with coagulase-negative staphylococci accounting for 48% of the infections. Considering generally neonatal sepsis in Europe, 90% of the responsible bacteria resulted to be: Streptococcus agalactiae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, e Listeria monocytogenes. The diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is difficult because clinical signs, particularly early in the course of disease, are subtle and nonspecific, and laboratory tests and blood culture are not always reliable, moreover blood culture, (the 'gold standard) takes 48-72 hours or more for result. In fact the cultural method shows a number of weak points: it requires the presence of living and vital germs, it depends on the volume of the collected sample - serious problem in neonatal population -, several hours are needed to process the sample, possibly resulting falsely negative in subjects undergoing concomitant antibiotic treatment or a false positive result can be found by contamination. The methods based on molecular biology do not require living germs and, therefore, are not characterised by the sensitivity limitations that are typical of cultural methods. For this reason, such methods can result to be extremely effective in patients who have already received an antibiotic therapy, and are not affected by rapid transport (so much so that samples can be stored at room temperature even for a few days) and, finally, do not require any culture medium.~In the present study, when an infant has to undergone blood sample for bacteria culture to verify a possible sepsis, a residual blood (200µl) is processed in the same time using a kit based on molecular biology. This kit is designed to obtain the highest sensitivity and specificity in the determination of most invasive bacterial diseases (meningitis, sepsis, pneumonia, etc.) affecting full-term, preterm infants to determine any presence of bacterial DNA belonging to all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes The target bacteria have been chosen on the basis of the current Italian epidemiological context, so as to include germs causing about 90% of the meningitis/sepsis cases among the neonatal population. The detection system can unmistakably identify the germ against which it is directed and without causing any cross-reaction with other germs or human DNA.~The results obtained with this method have demonstrated a 100% specificity (no false positive result). The sensitivity of this method compared with the cultural method has turned out to be twice as high.~The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of the blood culture method and the kit for molecular detection of bacterial DNA (all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes) considering the relevant epidemiology of our NICU, in order to verify the relative frequency of neonatal sepsis (EOS and LOS) caused by the target bacteria on the whole frequency of the bacteria responsible of all the sepsis in our ward.~The observational estimated period to collect 100 measurable samples, is 18 months from the beginning of the enrolment.~Samples correspond to the enrollment of term o preterm neonates who needed a blood withdrawal for a suspect of sepsis, that are processed by both mothods.
Although advances in neonatal care have improved survival and reduced complications in preterm infants, sepsis still contributes significantly to mortality and in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), in particular for very-low-birth-weight (VLBW, <1500 g) and extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW, <1000g). Based on the timing of the infection neonatal sepsis has been classified into early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset sepsis (LOS), with differences in the mode of transmission and predominant organisms. EOS is defined as onset in the first 3 days of life generally due to vertical transmission of bacteria from mothers to infants during the intrapartum period. LOS occurs after 3 days of life and it is attributed to pathogens acquired postnatally (horizontal transmission). Considering generally neonatal sepsis in Europe, 90% of the responsible bacteria resulted to be: Streptococcus agalactiae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, e Listeria monocytogenes. The diagnosis is difficult because clinical signs, particularly early in the course of disease, are subtle and nonspecific, and laboratory tests and blood culture are not always reliable. Moreover. blood culture (considered the 'gold standard) takes 48-72 hours for result. In fact the cultural method requires the presence of living and vital germs, depends on the volume of the sample - serious problem in neonatal population -, several hours are needed to process the sample, possibly resulting falsely negative in subjects undergoing concomitant antibiotic treatment or a false positive result can be found by contamination. The method based on molecular biology does not require living germs and, therefore, is not characterised by the sensitivity limitations. Such method can result to be extremely effective in patients receiving antibiotic therapy.~In the present study, when an infant has to undergone blood sample for bacteria culture to verify a possible sepsis, a residual blood (200µl) is processed in the same time using a kit based on molecular biology.~This kit is designed to obtain the highest sensitivity and specificity in the determination of most invasive bacterial diseases (meningitis, sepsis, pneumonia, etc.) affecting full-term, preterm infants to determine any presence of bacterial DNA belonging to all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes.~The target bacteria have been chosen on the basis of the current Italian epidemiological context, so as to include germs causing about 90% of the meningitis/sepsis cases among the neonatal population. The detection system can unmistakably identify the germ against which it is directed and without causing any cross-reaction with other germs or human DNA..~The results obtained with this method have demonstrated a 100% specificity (no false positive result) The sensitivity of this method compared with the cultural method has turned out to be twice as high.~The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of the blood culture method and the kit for molecular detection of bacterial DNA (all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes) considering the relevant epidemiology of our NICU, in order to verify the relative frequency of sepsis (EOS and LOS) caused by the target bacteria on the whole frequency of the bacteria responsible of all the sepsis in our ward.