OVERALL AIM OF THE STUDY To evaluate three diagnostic methods for assessment of intestinal disease in patients with suspected or newly diagnosed Crohn's disease and patients with known Crohn's disease.~PARTICIPATING CENTRES~Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense C~Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gastroenterology, Vejle Hospital, DK-7100 Vejle~Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gastroenterology, Sydvestjysk Hospital, DK-6700 Esbjerg~Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gastroenterology, Svendborg Hospital, DK-5700 Svendborg~Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, DK-7100 Vejle~PROTOCOL A~A comparative study of capsule endoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging and computer tomography scanning of the small bowel in patients with suspected or newly diagnosed Crohn's disease~Protocol procedures:~At inclusion all patients will have a standardised work-up including medical history, physical examination, blood and faeces samples and ileo-colonoscopy. Within two weeks MRI and CT scanning of the small intestine (on the same day and in randomised order) and subsequently CE will be performed in all patients. All investigations are described in a similar pre-defined and standardized fashion and the radiologist and physician responsible for describing the findings at MRI, CT and CE are blinded to the findings at ileo-colonoscopy and the other small bowel examinations. In the follow-up part of the study the physician in charge of the patient will be randomised to receive the results of either MRI, CT or CE.~Anticipated outcome:~The study is performed to improve evidence about what is the best primary investigation for assessment of small intestinal involvement in patients with suspected Crohn's disease, to evaluate if a combination of diagnostic modalities may improve our assessment of disease burden for the individual patients, to study whether the initial diagnostic modalities affect the handling of the patients and to study the interobserver variation of MRI and CT scanning.~PROTOCOL B~A comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging, computer tomography scanning and capsule endoscopy in patients with known Crohn's disease~Protocol procedures:~At inclusion all patients will undergo a standardised work-up including history, physical examination, blood and faeces samples and ileo-colonoscopy. Within two weeks MRI, CT scanning of the small intestine (on the same day in randomised order) and capsule endoscopy will be performed in all patients. Capsule endoscopy will not be performed in patients with small bowel stenosis confirmed at ileo-colonoscopy, MRI and/or CT. All three investigations will be described in a similar predefined standardized fashion with the radiologist blinded to the findings at ileo-colonoscopy. In the randomised part of the study the physician in charge of the patient will be randomised to receive the result of either MRI, CT og capsule endoscopy.~Anticipated outcome:~The best diagnostic method for evaluation of small intestinal involvement in patients with known Crohn's disease may be different from patients suspected of Crohn's disease. Thus in the current study we hope to provide evidence of whether MRI, CT scanning or capsule endoscopy is the best diagnostic approach.
The aim of this study is to evaluate three diagnostic methods for assessing small bowel disease in patients with suspected or known Crohn's disease. All patients are examined with ileo-colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy, MRI and CT of the small bowel within 14 days. However, capsule endoscopy is not performed in patients with stenosis detected at ileo-colonoscopy, MRI and/or CT. All investigations are described in a similar pre-defined and standardized fashion and the radiologist and physician responsible for describing the findings at MRI, CT and capsule endoscopy are blinded to the findings at ileo-colonoscopy. The physician in charge of treatment receives a randomised result of either MRI, CT or capsule endoscopy. Thereafter patients are followed during 12 months to evaluate differences in clinical outcome depending on the randomized result. In combination with the diagnostic validity and inter-observer agreement of MRI, CT and capsule endoscopy we seek to establish the optimal diagnostic strategy in these two patient categories.