Patients with acute (SCI) have a high risk of VTE despite thromboprophylaxis. The current standard thrombprophylaxis is to use LMWH fas soon as hemostasis is achieved. The duration of thromboprophylaxis is commonly 3 months. This entails once or twice daily subcutaneous injections of LMWH for the patients for this duration, which is inconvenient for the patients. There are currently no studies on use of DOACs for thromboprophylaxis in patients with SCI.~We will perform a pilot study at Hamilton General on apixaban versus LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute SCI. Upon providing written informed consent, eligible patients will be randomized to apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or LMWH, either enoxaparin 40 mg or dalteparin 5000 units, subcutaneously once daily for 90 days or until fully mobilized, whatever comes first.~The primary outcome for the feasibility study will be the recruitment rate per year (i.e. the screened to enrolled ratio). Other key feasibility measures will be accrual ratio, protocol violations pertaining to eligibility criteria and randomization procedures, retention rate for primary end-point assessment at 1 year, and the estimates of endpoint rates in the population. The primary efficacy endpoint will be a composite of symptomatic, objectively verified VTE (upper or lower limb DVT and/or PE) or sudden death where PE cannot be excluded. The primary safety endpoint will be major bleeding.~This will be the first study comparing the use of LMWH against a DOAC in SCI patients. Use of a DOAC such as apixaban can eliminate the burden associated with daily injections for the patients.
Thromboprophylaxis options are limited for patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) and there are no studies on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for thromboprophylaxis in this population. Participants will be randomized to apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or standard dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), either enoxaparin 40 mg or dalteparin 5000 units, subcutaneously once daily for 90 days or until fully mobilized, whatever comes first. Thromboprophylaxis will be started as soon as hemostasis is achieved. The primary outcome for this pilot study will be the recruitment rate per year (i.e. the screened to enrolled ratio). The primary efficacy endpoint will be a composite of symptomatic, objectively verified, venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as upper or lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) or sudden death where PE cannot be excluded. The primary safety endpoint will be major bleeding.