BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients who present with ST elevation myocardial infarction have multivessel coronary artery disease on angiography. Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be limited to the culprit lesion only or applied to all angiographically critical non-culprit lesions is still debatable. The FAME 2 study has shown that Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)-guided PCI, with adenosine infusion, reduces the MACE compared to medical therapy alone. In fact, according to the recent ESC clinical guidelines, FFR guided PCI is in class I, evidence level A. Previous studies, have confirmed that FFR values of non-culprit coronary lesions in STEMI patients provided similar values in the acute phase compared to the subacute phase, 5-7 days after primary PCI. Consequently, it is possible to assess angiographically borderline non-culprit lesions during the acute phase and hence risk stratify STEMI patients, thus reducing the duration of hospital stay by decreasing the need for additional non-invasive stress testing to detect residual myocardial ischemia. However, the assessment of angiographically borderline lesions using FFR has its own limitations related to the use of adenosine, which increases the risk of bradyarrhythmias and high degree atrioventricular block, especially in the acute phase. This would make functional assessment of the non-culprit lesions not always possible during the acute phase.~Recently, a new functional algorithm, called instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has been introduced. Similar to FFR, it gives a functional assessment of coronary lesions by measuring the trans-stenotic gradient during ventricular diastole, where intramyocardial resistance is minimal and constant. This phase has been shown to be comparable to the maximum hyperemic state of FFR assessment.~The measurement of iFR during the acute phase of STEMI has not yet been evaluated.~AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in non-culprit coronary lesions during the acute and subacute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).~METHOD: Patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI and presenting with multivessel coronary disease (at least one ≥ 50% diameter stenosis in a non-infarct-related coronary artery) were enrolled in a prospective observational registry. Coronary lesions were evaluated with both iFR and FFR immediately after primary PCI (acute phase) and 7 ± 3 days later (subacute phase).
Functional assessment of non-culprit lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome could improve risk stratification and shorten the duration of hospital stay by decreasing the need for additional non-invasive stress testing to detect residual myocardial ischemia. The investigators aimed to assess the reliability of the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in non-culprit coronary lesions during the acute and subacute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).