Both Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Oxygen through nasal cannula (HFO) are widely used in the setting of hypoxemic respiratory failure of heterogeneous etiology, with no definitive evidence for the superiority of one technique on the other. The purpose of this study is to determine whether alternating NIV and HFO brings any advantage on gas exchanges and prognosis compared to the use of HFO alone in the homogeneous setting of pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of alternating Non Invasive Ventilation NIV and High Flow Oxygen HFO compared to High Flow Oxygen HFO alone on gas exchanges and prognosis in pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure