Different works have shown a high rate of virological failure among patients on abacavir + lamivudine + tenofovir or ddI + 3TC + tenofovir, thus rendering the use of these combinations actively unadvisable.~Furthermore, recent studies have also shown that ABC+3TC are associated with a significantly higher increase in CD4 than the current treatment standard formed by AZT+3TC. This provides us with grounds to suppose that patients with TDF+ddI may recover their CD4 with ABC+3HT. Similarly, and recently, the existence of pharmacokinetic interactions between tenofovir + abacavir has begun to be questioned.~Finally, the replacement of tenofovir with abacavir or tenofovir + ddI with abacavir + lamivudine does not detract from the potency of HAART, the toxicity profile is different and their behaviour at mitochondrial level is similar.~This study aims to ascertain whether the sole replacement of tenofovir with abacavir once a day improves the immunological response obtained with tenofovir + ddI or whether it is better to perform a double replacement of tenofovir and ddI with abacavir + lamivudine (joint formulation) in a single daily dose to achieve these objectives.
The study aims to ascertain whether the sole replacement of tenofovir with abacavir once a day improves the immunological response obtained with tenofovir + ddI or whether it is better to perform a double replacement of tenofovir and ddI with abacavir + lamivudine (joint formulation) in a single daily dose to achieve these objectives.