A total of 80 individuals, comprising 20 patients with stage II grade B periodontitis (P1 Group), 20 patients with stage III grade B periodontitis (P2 Group), 20 patients with gingivitis (G Group), and 20 periodontally healthy controls (H Group) were involved in the study.~The participants were classified into four groups depending on periodontal health status in accordance with the consensus reports of the 2017 World Workshop:~periodontally healthy (H) group: no interproximal attachment loss (AL), probing depth (PD) ≤3 mm, bleeding on probing (BOP) scores <10%;~gingivitis (G) group: no interproximal AL, PD ≤3 mm, and BOP ≥10%;~stage II grade B periodontitis (P1) group: 3 <PD ≤5 mm and 3 ≤ clinical attachment loss (CAL) <5 mm in one or more sites of the 2 non-adjacent teeth in at least two quadrants of the mouth, full mouth BOP ≥ 10% and no tooth loss due to periodontitis~stage III grade B periodontitis (P2) group: PD >5 mm and CAL ≥ 5 mm in one or more sites of the 2 non-adjacent teeth in at least two quadrants of the mouth, full mouth BOP >10% and tooth loss due to periodontitis of ≤4 teeth.~Inclusion criteria were as follows:~aged >18 years,~having at least 16 natural teeth (excluding third molar),~not having any diagnosed medical illness or drug intake that could affect the periodontal condition.~Exclusion criteria were as follows:~The patients who had taken antibiotics, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory or any other drugs within the past 3 months,~received nonsurgical or surgical periodontal treatment,~a restorative and endodontic therapy requirement,~a removable partial denture and/or having orthodontic therapy~Current pregnancy or lactation, obesity, heavy smoking and having serum C reactive protein (CRP) > 3mg/L.~All individuals were examined at baseline and four weeks after non-surgical periodontal treatment including, whole mouth probing depth (PD), CAL, presence of bleeding on probing (BOP), papillar bleeding index (PBI), gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) except the third molars. PD and CAL were measured at six sites per tooth using a manual periodontal probe.~The non-surgical periodontal treatment for P1 and P2 groups included supra- and subgingival scaling, root planing and oral hygiene instructions. Subgingival scaling and root planing were performed under local anesthesia in two sessions within the 48-72 h. Gingivitis group had supra-and subgingival scaling, polishing and oral hygiene instructions. The treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis patients were performed by a periodontist (BM) using hand and ultrasonic instruments. All measurements were performed by the same calibrated examiner (BM).~Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling~GCF samples were obtained from four nonadjacent interproximal sites in two maxillar and two mandibular multi-rooted teeth by standardized filter paper strips. GCF samples were taken from four sites with GI <1, PD ≤ 3, PBI =0 and CAL =0 in the H group; from four sites with GI ≥2, PD ≤3, PBI >2 and CAL=0 in the G group; from four sites (deepest pockets 3 <PD ≤5) with GI ≥2, PBI >2 and 3 ≤CAL <5 mm in P1 group; and from four sites (deepest pockets PD ≥5) with GI ≥2, PBI >2 and CAL ≥5 mm in P2 group according to the baseline clinical measurements.~Serum sampling~Serum samples were taken following GCF sampling before the periodontal treatment. Six milliliters of venous blood were obtained by a standard venipuncture method and the serum was separated from blood by centrifugation at 1,500 g for 20 minutes.~Biochemical Assays~Levels of GCF ErbB4, Nrg4, IL-6, IL-10 and levels of serum ErbB4, Nrg4, nitric oxide synthase (NOS)2 and Arg1 were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using commercial kits according to the manufacturer's guidelines.~Statistical Analysis~All data analyses were performed using a statistical software package. Comparisons of clinical and biochemical parameters between the study groups were performed using the Kruskal- Wallis with Mann Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction method. The intragroup comparisons (at baseline and first month) were performed using Wilcoxon test for paired samples. Associations among levels of the GCF and serum biomarkers and clinical parameters were also examined using the Spearman rank correlation analysis.
This study aimed to investigate gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and serum ErbB4 and Nrg4 levels in periodontal health and disease. A total of 80 individuals, 20 patients with stage II grade B periodontitis, 20 patients with stage III grade B periodontitis, 20 with gingivitis and 20 periodontally healthy individuals were included. Whole-mouth and site-specific clinical periodontal parameters including probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, gingival index, plaque index and papillar bleeding index were recorded. GCF and serum ErbB4 and Nrg4 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Statistical analysis was performed by using non-parametric tests.