This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, two-arm, open-label study, designed to assess the non-inferiority of Resolute stent compared to Taxus Liberte stent in in-stent late lumen loss.~The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at 9 months, defined as the difference between the post-procedure minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and the follow-up angiography MLD, of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System compared to Taxus Liberte Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in a real-world all-comer patient population requiring stent implantation.~This trial will be conducted at approximately 20 sites and will enroll up to 400 subjects, randomized to the Resolute stent and Taxus Liberte stent in a 1:1 ratio. Subjects will be randomized using an interactive voice response system (IVRS).~Due to the design characteristics of the devices, the study investigators and operators can not be blinded. However, the clinical event adjudication committee, consisting of cardiologists who are not participating in the study, will be blinded for the treatment arm of the subjects to avoid a potential bias in the adjudication process of events.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at 9 months, defined as the difference between the post-procedure minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and the follow-up angiography MLD, of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System compared to Taxus Liberte Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in a real-world all-comer patient population requiring stent implantation.