Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival among patients with ischemic heart failure (HF) who have not previously had a sustained ventricular arrhythmia. However, ICD shocks that terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) are associated with higher mortality, which may be a reflection of ICD shocks being a marker of more advanced disease versus shocks causing a worse prognosis. In addition, ICD shocks are associated with decreased functional status and quality of life. Antiarrhythmic medications (AAD) reduce ICD shocks but have high rates of side effects and lack of compliance within 1 year of initiation. Some randomized, controlled clinical trials have shown that catheter ablation (CA) of VT can decrease the number of episodes of VT and ICD shocks which could translate to an improvement in patient outcomes.~Regarding the approach to CA of VT, several controversies and gaps of knowledge can be found in the literature. Some authors target predominantly clinical VTs (activation and entrainment mapping), while others focus on the substrate causing VTs without focusing on VT morphologies (elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities and late potentials). In addition, data on timing of the CA procedure is inconsistent. However, early CA strategy seems feasible as end-stage cardiovascular disease increases procedural risk and is associated with arrhythmias that may be less amenable to successful treatment with ablation.~The current focus on risk stratifying patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who could benefit from a primary prevention ICD solely on basis of ejection fraction and NYHA class is far from ideal. In patients with ischemic HF, the presence of the coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) is related to worse long-term prognosis. Moreover, in a subgroup of ischemic patients, CTO associated with a previous infarction in its territory was an independent predictor of ventricular arrhythmias. Recent studies reported that primary prevention patients with CTO of an infarct-related artery (CTO-IRA) have a very high risk of appropriate ICD therapies due to fast VTs. As post-myocardial infarction scar is a well-recognized substrate of VTs, these patients might benefit from prophylactic substrate ablation at the time of primary ICD implantation.~Eligible and consenting patients on optimal medical HF treatment with confirmed CTO-IRA will be equally randomized to receive either a primary prevention ICD or a CA procedure and an ICD. Catheter ablation with a uniform procedural endpoint and definition of acute procedural success was to be performed before ICD implantation. ICD programming will be standardized for all subjects according to primary prevention settings.~Subjects will be seen at baseline randomization, then 1 month after ICD implantation and every 6 months thereafter until the end of the study. Subjects will be followed up for a minimum of 24 months. Quality of life questionnaires will be done at each visit.~The aim of this study is to assess whether preventive substrate ablation of CTO-IRA area in HF patients correlates with lower appropriate ICD therapies. In addition, the purpose of the study is to determine whether prophylactic substrate ablation at the time of primary ICD implantation in high-risk ischemic patients affects unplanned hospitalization, HF progression, and quality of life.
The aim of this study is to assess whether preventive substrate ablation of chronic total occlusion infarct-related artery (CTO-IRA) area in heart failure (HF) patients correlates with lower appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies. In addition, the purpose of the study is to determine whether prophylactic substrate ablation at the time of primary ICD implantation in high-risk ischemic patients affects unplanned hospitalization, HF progression, and quality of life.