Pulmonary vein isolation is increasingly been used to cure atrial fibrillation . A matter of concern comes from the evidence that AF ablation is associated by the appearance of microembolism on brain MRI scan. These microembolism are not associated with neurologic symptoms and seem to be at least partially, reversible in time. Correlation between the incidence of these cerebral lesions and the ablation technology used has been demonstrated: circular multipolar phased radiofrequency ablation using the PVAC catheter a duty-cycled non irrigated RF has been associated with the highest incidence of new lesion formation using MRI, whereas irrigated radiofrequency catheter and cryoablation seem to be the safer in this aspect. These thromboembolic events can be cumulatively assessed by the detection of microembolic signals in the cerebral arteries by transcranial Doppler performed during the ablation. Past studies have compared the incidence of MESs in TCD during PVI using different ablation techniques - Sauren et al. demonstrated that use of irrigated RF and or cryoablation produces signiﬁcantly fewer cerebral MESs than the use of RF ablation with non irrigated catheters. A recent publication compared the occurrence of MESs using TCD while performing PVI by cryoablation compared with the PVAC catheter, reinforcing the MRI findings that the circumferential PVAC catheter possesses higher thromboembolic risk, possibly due to the lack of irrigation. Recently, a novel multipolar irrigated RF ablation catheter has been introduced. Ablations are performed simultaneously in a unipolar shape from 10 electrodes located at the tip of the ablation catheter. The catheter is under constant irrigation. No data exists regarding the incidence of MES in TCD during ablation with the nMARQ catheter. The aim of the investigators study is to analyze the incidence of MES by TCD performed during AF ablation with the nMARQ and to compare is with the incidence of MES using a conventional irrigated ablation catheter. Objective: To investigate the incidence of MES on TCD during AF ablation with the nMARQ catheter compared to a conventional irrigated ablation catheter. Methods: Study Population: 20 patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for highly symptomatic, drug refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF. Study design: Following inclusion, patients will be randomized into 2 equal different treatment groups: PVI with traditional irrigated RF catheter versus PVI using the nMARQ catheter. In all patients, anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is discontinued five-days before the procedure and low molecular weight heparin is initiated at that time. A CT-scan of the left atrium is performed and imported into the Carto 3 mapping system. The ablation procedure is conducted under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. A decapolar catheter is positioned in the coronary sinus and a quadripolar catheter is positioned at the His bundle level through the right femoral vein. Two 8F sheaths are introduced into the left atrium with double trans-septal puncture performed under fluoroscopic, trans-esophageal echocardiographic or intracardiac echocardiography guidance. Upon completion of the first trans-septal puncture, intravenous heparin is administered to maintain an activated clotting time of 350 seconds throughout the procedure. A variable Lasso circular mapping catheter is introduced through the SL1 sheath into each pulmonary vein for electrical mapping. After the second trans-septal puncture, a Navistar Thermocool 3.5mm irrigated ablation catheter or an nMARQ circular irrigated ablation catheter are introduced into the left atrium. Of note, in case of use the nMARQ catheter, the second SL-1 sheath is replaced by a steerable 8F agilis sheath after the second trans-septal puncture. Each of the 4 PVs are imaged by selective angiograms. The left atrium geometry is created using the nMARQ catheter or the Navistar catheter and then merged with the pre-acquired CT scan of the left atrium and PVs. The PV antrum is defined with angiogram and electrograms analyses. Isolation of each PV is performed at the PV antrum by delivery of RF from multiple irrigated electrodes on the nMARQ catheter simultaneously and using the following settings: catheter irrigation flow rate of 60 mL/minute, target temperature 35 and maximal energy of 25 W for the anterior aspect of the antrum and 15W for the posterior atrial wall. RF energy is applied at each ablation site for a maximum of 45 seconds, until the local PV electrogram disappeared or its amplitude decreased by 80%. In case of RF ablation by the Navistar catheter, the ablation is performed in a point by point fashion at the PV antrum encircling the PV os. Ablation is performed with the following settings: catheter irrigation flow rate of 22 mL/minute, target temperature 35° and maximal energy of 35 W for the anterior aspect of the antrum and 20W for the posterior atrial wall. RF energy is applied at each ablation site for a maximum of 45 seconds, until the local PV electrogram disappeared or its amplitude decreased by 80%. Isolation of the left sided PVs is conducted during atrial pacing from the distal CS catheter whereas isolation of the right PVs is conducted during sinus rhythm. The endpoint of the procedure is the isolation of all PVs, attested by disappearance of all PV potentials in the lasso catheter within the vein and confirmed by pacing maneuvers.~TCD recording will be performed throughout the whole period of the PVI procedure from the preparation of trans-septal LA access until the termination of the procedure. The transducer is held in place by a proprietary headpiece supplied with the system. The middle cerebral arteries will be bilaterally insonated from transtemporal windows by using a multifrequency Doppler. Identiﬁcation of true MESs will be possible using an event detector system, in addition to determining whether the MESs are attributed to a solid or to a gaseous embolus. Total MES counts will be collected and evaluated separately during different stages of the procedure. All statistical analysis and manuscript drafting will be performed at the Tel Aviv medical center.
The aim of the investigators study is to analyze the incidence of MES by TCD performed during AF ablation with the nMARQ and to compare is with the incidence of MES using a conventional irrigated ablation catheter. Objective: To investigate the incidence of MES on TCD during AF ablation with the nMARQ catheter compared to a conventional irrigated ablation catheter. Following inclusion, patients will be randomized into 2 equal different treatment groups: PVI with traditional irrigated RF catheter versus PVI using the nMARQ catheter. In all patients, anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is discontinued five-days before the procedure and low molecular weight heparin is initiated at that time. A CT-scan of the left atrium is performed and imported into the Carto 3 mapping system. The ablation procedure is conducted under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. A decapolar catheter is positioned in the coronary sinus and a quadripolar catheter is positioned at the His bundle level through the right femoral vein. Two 8F sheaths are introduced into the left atrium with double trans-septal puncture performed under fluoroscopic, trans-esophageal echocardiographic or intracardiac echocardiography guidance. Upon completion of the first trans-septal puncture, intravenous heparin is administered to maintain an activated clotting time of 350 seconds throughout the procedure. A variable Lasso circular mapping catheter is introduced through the SL1 sheath into each pulmonary vein for electrical mapping. After the second trans-septal puncture, a Navistar Thermocool 3.5mm irrigated ablation catheter or an nMARQ circular irrigated ablation catheter are introduced into the left atrium. Of note, in case of use the nMARQ catheter, the second SL-1 sheath is replaced by a steerable 8F agilis sheath after the second trans-septal puncture. Each of the 4 PVs are imaged by selective angiograms. The left atrium geometry is created using the nMARQ catheter or the Navistar catheter and then merged with the pre-acquired CT scan of the left atrium and PVs. Identiﬁcation of true MESs will be possible using an event detector system, in addition to determining whether the MESs are attributed to a solid or to a gaseous embolus. Total MES counts will be collected and evaluated separately during different stages of the procedure.