Tolerating subretinal fluid (SRF) is one of the current major issues in the field of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Previous post-hoc analysis studies have demonstrated that SRF is not associated with poor visual acuity as well as poor visual outcome. In addition, previous studies showed that tolerating small amount of SRF may not influence visual outcome when using treat-and-extend regimen. Based on these observations, it is generally accepted that small stable amounts of SRF can be tolerated.~To date, several clinical trials evaluated association of residual SRF with visual outcome. In these clinical trials, treatment was performed based on strict study protocol. In addition, strict rescue treatment criteria impeded definite under-treatment. However, in a clinical setting, non-scientific factors such as financial or time burden, fear to injection and compliance can influence treatment decisions. As a result, in some patients, more intensive treatment cannot be performed despite substantial amount of persistent retinal fluid.~Unlike clinical trials, in real-world practice it is difficult to precisely measure and tolerate fluid in strict amounts. As a result, large degree of fluctuation of fluid volume can occur in some patients. In addition, large amounts of fluid, which may not be tolerated in clinical trials, can persist for a relatively long period. Such cases are usually difficult to encounter in clinical trials because these patients are either treated more intensively or are dropped from the trial. Investigating the outcomes in these cases can provide useful information that cannot be obtained from clinical trials.~The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV), including polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in patients treated tolerating SRF using Aflibercept in a clinical setting. Approximately 150 patients are anticipated to be enrolled in this study. SRF is a primary type of fluid compartment prevalent in type 1 aneurysmal MNV. In a recent study, the prevalence of SRF during 24-month follow-up period was 36.7% to 38.8% in type 1 MNV and PCV, 20.0% in type 2 MNV, and 7.7% in type 3 MNV. In addition, patients with SRF showed better visual prognosis in type 1 MNV/PCV. For this reason, type 1 MNV is an appropriate candidate for evaluating the influence of tolerating SRF.~This study may contribute to the better understanding the influence of tolerating SRF on treatment outcomes in patients diagnosed with this subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In addition, it may also contribute to the evolution of aflibercept T&E therapy, and provide evidence for physicians to guide treatment decisions.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV), including polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in patients treated tolerating subretinal fluid (SRF) using Aflibercept in a clinical setting. Approximately 150 patients are anticipated to be enrolled in this study. SRF is a primary type of fluid compartment prevalent in type 1 aneurysmal MNV. In a recent study, the prevalence of SRF during 24-month follow-up period was 36.7% to 38.8% in type 1 MNV and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), 20.0% in type 2 MNV, and 7.7% in type 3 MNV. In addition, patients with SRF showed better visual prognosis in type 1 MNV/PCV. For this reason, type 1 MNV is an appropriate candidate for evaluating the influence of tolerating SRF.