CTS is the most common non-traumatic hand disorder, prevalent in approximately 4% of the adult population. The condition may have a substantial impact on an individual's quality of life, ability to accomplish activities of daily living, and to perform occupational duties. Associated healthcare costs represent a significant socioeconomic burden.~Currently, many patients with mild and moderate CTS treated surgically without a preceding trial of less invasive non-surgical therapies. An increase in the use of non-surgical first-line therapies (e.g. corticosteroid injection into the carpal tunnel), while reserving surgery for refractory cases, aim to optimize the trade-off between treatment risk and benefit, while also ensuring appropriate use of health resources. However, there is a lack of studies directly comparing the efficacy of corticosteroid injections to surgery, and the long-term safety of corticosteroid injections has not been investigated.~It is not well-known if patients who are initially treated with corticosteroid injections will eventually need to proceed to surgery, and therefore may have to endure the symptoms for a longer period of time, with potentially worse long-term outcomes, compared to patients who has surgery as first-line treatment. On the other hand, it is not beneficial if patients are unnecessarily exposed to the risks associated with surgery, if symptoms could have been satisfactory resolved with a non-surgical method.~The current study will assess if first-line treatment with up to two ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections is non-inferior to surgery with regards to treatment success. A less invasive treatment approach might result in important benefits to the patient, e.g. less pain, reduced risk of complications, and faster return to work and activities. This might also be of importance to family members, as many CTS patients are at an age where they have care responsibilities. Non-surgical treatments might benefit society by decreasing work absence and reducing health expenditure, and allowing better access to surgical services for other patient groups. High quality documentation is needed to provide a base for future treatment guidelines. Evidence based clinical guidelines provide treatment decision support and help reduce national and regional differences in treatment practices, and ensure that all patients have equal access to evidence-based treatment.~In the NOR-CACTUS trial, adult individuals with idiopathic CTS of a mild-to-moderate degree will be randomized to receive either A) Primary open surgical carpal tunnel release, or B) Up to two ultrasound-guided corticosteroid (triamcinolone hexacetonide) injections in the carpal tunnel, and subsequent open surgical carpal tunnel release in case of unsatisfactory treatment result. Participants will be randomized to receive one of the treatment strategies, and followed for two years, with the primary endpoint being successful treatment result one year after start of the intervention.~The hypothesis of the study is that the percentage of patients with a satisfactory symptom relief (treatment success) one year after the initial therapeutic intervention in the injection treatment strategy arm is non-inferior to that of the surgery treatment arm. The primary outcome is based on the disease-specific patient-reported outcome Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) symptom severity scale (SSS). Further outcomes will include other patient-reported, clinical, functional and neurophysiological measures, and health-economic aspects.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) causes numbness and pain in the hand and arm, and is an important cause of work absence and disability. The aim of the NOR-CACTUS Trial is to compare outcomes of a treatment strategy where the initial treatment is up to two ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections, followed by scheduled clinical assessment of treatment effect, and subsequent surgery if needed, to a treatment strategy where surgery is the first-line treatment. Participants will be randomized to one of the treatment strategies, and followed up for two years after start of the study intervention. Outcomes will include patient-reported, clinical, functional and neurophysiological measures, and health-economic aspects. The hypothesis of the study is that there is no difference between the two treatment groups in the percentage of patients with a satisfactory symptom relief (treatment success) one year after the initial therapeutic intervention.