Rationale: The organ preservation approach for rectal cancer has been explored increasingly, aiming at improving quality of life by prevention of total mesorectal excision (TME-surgery). In patients with intermediate rectal cancer (IRC) and locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who receive neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (in general a short-course radiotherapy or a long-course chemoradiation, respectively) subsequent TME-surgery is still standard of care.~In patients with a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation, organ preservation may be considered, depending on the extent of the response monitored by radiological and endoscopic assessment. Some patients show a clinical complete response and can be monitored closely in a watch-and-wait approach. In case of a good, but not complete response, it remains unclear which patients may benefit from extension of the observation period after (chemo)radiation in order to achieve a complete clinical response over time, or in whom additional local treatment options (such as contact x-ray brachytherapy or local excision) are beneficial in obtaining organ preservation eventually.~Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate which rate of organ preservation can be achieved in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy with a good clinical response, and to optimize the different treatment strategies. In patients with a near-complete response or a small residual tumour mass, participation is offered in a phase II feasibility trial, in which two potential organ preservation treatment strategies are evaluated: contact x-ray brachytherapy or extension of the waiting interval with or without additional local excision in case of residual disease.~Study design: This is a prospective study with a mixed design. It concerns a phase II feasibility study for patients in whom a good, but not complete response has been achieved after (chemo)radiation (OPAXX study): two parallel single study-arms evaluate the efficacy of experimental organ preservation approaches. To allow for a better comparison of secondary parameters (toxicity and morbidity of both additional local treatments) eligible patients will be randomized between two experimental arms. Furthermore, an observational cohort study is established to register rectal cancer patients with a good but not complete clinical response after (chemo)radiation who are not eligible for randomisation in the OPAXX study (OPAXX registration study).~Study population: In general, patients with IRC receiving short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery (patients with initially a cT1-3, cN1-2 lymph nodal status, no involved MRF or cT3c-d, N0-1 lymph nodal status) or patients with LARC receiving neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation (patients with initially cT4 tumour, cN2 lymph node status, lateral lymph node involvement and/or an involved mesorectal fascia (MRF+)) according to the Dutch national guideline are eligible for this study when at the first response assessment 6-8 weeks after finishing the (chemo)radiation a good clinical response is seen. A good clinical response has been defined as a clinical complete response, a near-complete response or a small residual tumour mass <3 cm on endoscopy, but also no evidence of residual nodal disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (ycN0). In case of a clinical complete response the current strategy of watchful waiting is offered. Eligible patients in whom a good, but not complete response is detected will be randomized to one of the two experimental OPAXX study arms, provided that both additional local treatment options are technically feasible.~Intervention arms OPAXX study:~Arm 1: Contact x-ray brachytherapy will be given applied after randomisation with a maximum interval of 14 weeks after finishing the neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation. Contact x-ray brachytherapy consists of three fractions of 30Gy per fraction applied to the tumour, with a 2 week interval between each boost. Response evaluation takes place every 3 months thereafter. Patients in whom a clinical complete response is detected during follow-up are offered a watch-and-wait approach; patients in whom an incomplete response or disease progression is noted, completion or salvage TME-surgery is advised.~Arm 2: The waiting interval will be extended with 6-8 more weeks after the first response evaluation, followed by a second (or third in case of ongoing response) re-assessment. Patients with a clinical complete response at the time of the second (or third) response evaluation will be offered a watch-and-wait approach without any surgical treatment. Patients with a remaining small lesion will be offered transanal local excision. Depending on the final pathological staging after local excision, patients are categorized as low-risk or high-risk, and will be offered a watch-and-wait strategy or completion TME-surgery, respectively.~Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint of the OPAXX study reflects the efficacy of both additional treatment options: the rate of successful organ preservation (defined as an in-situ rectum, no defunctioning stoma and absence of active locoregional cancer failure) at one year following randomisation in rectal cancer patients with a good, but not complete clinical response after (chemo)radiation. Secondary endpoints are related to toxicity and morbidity of the two additional treatment options in the randomisation study, as well as to oncological and functional outcomes at one, two and five years of follow-up.~For patients with a good but not complete clinical response after (chemo)radiation who are not eligible for randomisation in the OPAXX study an observational cohort study is conducted (OPAXX registration study).~Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Standard treatment of IRC and LAR consists of neoadjuvant short-course or long-course (chemo)radiotherapy followed by TME-surgery. If a clinical complete response is seen at response evaluation, a watch-and-wait approach is currently considered a valid strategy in selected patients according to the Dutch national guidelines. In the ongoing Dutch national prospective registry patients with a near-complete response are currently offered an extension of the observation period rather than TME-surgery, and, subsequently, a watch-and-wait policy when a clinical complete response is noted over time. On the other hand, all patients with a persistent residual lesion will proceed to TME-surgery.~In the current study, two experimental approaches are introduced that could increase organ preservation rates in patients with a good, but not-complete response at the first response evaluation: additional endoluminal contact x-ray brachytherapy and local excision of the tumour remnant.~Prior to randomisation, eligible patients are well informed about the risks of the two experimental treatment strategies (i.e. unclear long-term oncological outcome), and are offered standard-of-care TME-surgery. Moreover, patients will be informed that additional treatment with contact x-ray brachytherapy or local excision might increase the morbidity rates in case completion or salvage TME-surgery is required.~Finally, in both arms of this phase II study an intensive surveillance program has been established, in order to detect treatment failure, tumour regrowth or disease recurrence at an early stage, in order to proceed to completion or salvage TME-surgery when needed and when possible.
The goal of this prospective phase II feasibility study is to evaluate two additional local treatment options in rectal cancer patients with a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation: contact x-ray brachytherapy versus extension of the waiting interval with or without local excision, and to investigate which rate of organ preservation can be achieved.