Background: Tinnitus is a highly prevalent symptom with a variety of possible underlying diseases, affecting 10-15% of the adult population. Apart from the heterogenous clinical origin, it is also characterised by a diverse clinical representation, often causing distress and interfering with daily functioning and quality of life. In case the tinnitus is influenced by alterations in somatosensory afference from the cervical spine or temporomandibular area, due to increased muscle tension or movement restrictions, it is referred to as somatic or somatosensory tinnitus (ST). ST is known to react well to physiotherapy treatment, but currently, it is hard to motivate patients to do their home exercises properly and the necessary tinnitus counselling is often lacking.~Objective: The twofold aim of this study is to examine if the treatment effect and cost-effectiveness of a smartphone application, designed to increase therapy compliance and provide tinnitus counselling, as part of a blended physiotherapy program, is, as hypothesised, as good as or better in comparison to standard clinical care.~Methods and design: This study is designed as a single-blind two-arm 1:1 randomised control trial. Adult patients diagnosed with ST, without psychiatric comorbidities and with basic knowledge of the use of a smartphone, will be recruited at the Ear Nose Throat (ENT) department of the Antwerp university hospital (UZA). After inclusion and baseline measurements, patients will be randomised to one of the treatment groups. The experimental group will receive the blended physiotherapy program containing six in-clinic physiotherapy sessions over a period of twelve weeks (1x/2weeks) and access to the exercise and counselling program provided by the smartphone application. The control group will receive the standard care physiotherapy program comprising twelve weekly in-clinic physiotherapy sessions. As a primary outcome measure, the change in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) score at 1 month after the last treatment will be used. Secondary outcome measures are the visual analogue scale (VAS) for tinnitus loudness, Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ), Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain screener, clinical neck and jaw tests, pure tone audiometry, speech-in-quiet (SPIQ) and speech-in-noise (SPIN) understanding, psychoacoustic tinnitus measures (tinnitus pitch and loudness matching), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ). Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed informing on both medical costs and indirect costs. Data from the Euroqol EQ-5D and iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (PCQ) will be used in this analysis. Data for all outcome measures will be collected at baseline, one month after the last treatment session and three months after the last treatment session.~Discussion: This is the first study to combine both tinnitus counselling and neck/jaw pain treatment provided by a digital application in a blended physiotherapy program. This is in order to empower ST patients to improve and better manage their own health and possibly reduce economic costs by alleviating the tinnitus burden ST patients experience. The advantages of this single-blind two-arm randomised controlled trial are the high-quality methodological design, the great sample size and the expertise of the research team.
The twofold aim of this single-blind two-arm 1:1 randomised control trial is to examine if the treatment effect and cost-effectiveness of a smartphone application, designed to increase therapy compliance and provide tinnitus counselling, as part of a blended physiotherapy program, is, as hypothesised, as good as or better in comparison to standard clinical care.