In the last decades fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been established as a highly effective option recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) treatment, with a success rate of nearly 90%. For this reason, it is recommended by international guidelines as a treatment option for this indication in clinical practice.~Recently, a considerable body of evidence supports FMT as an effective and safe treatment in patients affected by Ulcerative Colitis (UC). In a recent meta-analysis of 324 subjects with UC, 30.4% of patients achieved both clinical and endoscopic remission after FMT compared to placebo (9.8%, P<0.00001). However, among the various published trials there is a fair variability in terms of methods and results, which are not comparable to those obtained in the rCDI.~Nowadays, one of the most critical factors involved in the effectiveness of FMT in UC patients is the choice of the donor. In addition, several studies have shown that some donors have been associated with a higher clinical response rate than others. This hypothesis has been demonstrated in patients affected by irritable bowel syndrome, in which the use of a super-donor (a healthy person who has the predictive clinical and lifestyle characteristics of a healthy microbiota, and with a microbial profile associated with favorable clinical conditions) resulted in significantly higher clinical efficacy rates than placebo, similar to those obtained in rCDI (89%).~Currently, studies that explored the efficacy of the superdonor FMT in UC patients are not yet available.~The extended aims of this study are:~To compare the efficacy of superdonor FMT and placebo FMT in treating mild-to-moderate Ulcerative Colitis.~To investigate changes in gut microbiome after treatments~To investigate changes in serum cytokines after treatments~To investigate changes in disease activity, investigated by the use of partial mayo score, after treatments.~The investigators will carry out a single-centre double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of super - donor FMT vs placebo FMT in patients with mild-to-moderate UC Patients will be recruited among those referred to the gastroenterology unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli. Patients with all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria (detailed in the specific section of this website) will be considered for this study.~Before randomization, demographic data will be collected by the gastroenterology staff.~Moreover, patients will be requested to give stool samples to be collected in a sterile, sealed container and stored at -80°C for metagenomic assessment of gut microbiome by the microbiology staff. Additionally, a blood sample will be collect for cytokine immunoassays.~After baseline assessments, patients will be randomly assigned to one of the following treatment arms:~Donor FMT (D-FMT)~Placebo FMT (P-FMT) Patients in both groups will undergo three FMT procedure. Each patient in the D-FMT group will receive feces from one single donor. Placebo FMT will be made of 250 mL water for colonoscopy or using empty capsules. The selection of stool donors will be performed by the gastroenterology staff following protocols previously recommended by international guidelines and according the new recommendation imposed by the reorganization of fecal microbiota transplant during the COVID-19 pandemic. The assignment of fecal infusates from healthy donors to patients will be done randomly, without any specific recipient-donor match, as this is not recommended by international guidelines All fecal infusates and capsules will be manufactured in the microbiology unit of our hospital. Only frozen feces will be used. Preparation of frozen feces will follow protocols from international guidelines. Patients in both groups will undergo the first infusion by colonoscopy. Then, patients will receive frozen fecal capsules ( 15 capsules b.i.d.) at 3 and 7 days after the first FMT.~Furthermore, patients in the D-FMT group receive a pre-conditioning with vancomycin and neomycin+bacitracin for 3 days, because published data from our group show that pre-FMT antibiotics are associated with higher rates of microbial engraftment rates and increased clinical response regardless of the disease.~Patients of the P-FMT group will receive a pre-conditioning with placebo at the same dose.~Follow-up visits will be performed by physicians from the gastroenterology unit. All patients will be followed up for 2 months after the end of treatments. Follow-up visits will be scheduled at week 1, week 4, and week 8, after the end of treatments.~At each visit the following assessments will be performed: 1) collection of stool samples for microbiome analysis; 2) collection of blood sample for cytokine immunoassay; 3) record of adverse events. Unscheduled follow-up visits will be offered if requested by the patients.~Study Outcomes are detailed in the specific section of this website. The statistical analysis will be performed both on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis. Differences among groups will be assessed with a two tailed Wilcoxon-rank sum test for continuous data and with Fisher's exact probability test (using two-tailed P-values) for categorical data. Differences in cure percentages will be determined with Fisher's exact test (with two-tailed P values). Microbiome analysis will be performed with shotgun sequencing techniques. For microbiome analysis statistical differences between group means will be calculated using a two-tailed Wilcoxon-Rank Sum Test, through the R statistical software package (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria).
In the last decades fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been established as a highly effective option in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), with a success rate of nearly 90%. For this reason, it is recommended by international guidelines as a treatment option for this indication in clinical practice.~Recently, a considerable body of evidences, suggest FMT as an effective and safe treatment in patients affected by Ulcerative Colitis (UC). In a recent meta-analysis of 324 subjects with UC, 30.4% of patients achieved both clinical and endoscopic remission after FMT compared to placebo (9.8%, P<0.00001). However, among the various published trials there is a fair variability in terms of methods and results, which are not comparable to those obtained in the rCDI.~Nowadays, one of the most critical factors involved in the effectiveness of FMT in UC patients, is the choice of the donor.~In addition, several studies have shown that some donors are associated with a higher clinical response rate than others. This hypothesis has been demonstrated in patients affected by irritable bowel syndrome, in which the use of a super-donor (a healthy person who has the predictive clinical and lifestyle characteristics of a healthy microbiota, and with a microbial profile associated with favorable clinical conditions) resulted in significantly higher clinical efficacy rates than placebo, similar to those obtained in rCDI (89%).~Currently, studies that explored the efficacy of the super-donor FMT in UC patients are not yet available. Aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of super - donor FMT, compared with placebo FMT, in the treatment of UC. The investigators will randomize adult patients with a recent diagnosis of UC to FMT from super - donors or placebo, by colonoscopy (first infusion) and capsules administration. Then, patients will be followed up 2 months after FMT.