Ischemic coronary artery disease is an important health challenge and a common cause of death worldwide. Patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome are frequently referred to the emergency department (ED) and impose a high work-load on hospitals. Since 2009, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have become a crucial ED tool for differentiating between patients with and without Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Accordingly, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommends 0-1 hour algorithms that use hs-cTn for rule-out and rule-in of NSTEMI.~Additionally, the clinical suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or other life-threating conditions must be low.~Unfortunately, these algorithms have been difficult to implement into routine and clinical practice, and are only used by a limited number of hospitals due to lack of randomized clinical trials and practical obstacles, including turnaround time for troponins.~The aim of the current study is to perform a RCT comparing safety and efficiency of a standard care (in-line with current ESC recommendations) to an algorithm that utilize a POC troponin tests for bedside measurement, the instruments could be located in the ED and return results in few minutes.
The aim of the current study is to perform a RCT comparing safety and efficiency of a standard care (in-line with current ESC recommendations) to an algorithm that utilize a POC troponin tests for bedside measurement, the instruments could be located in the ED and return results in few minutes.