In this study, a cohort observation method was adopted to observe a total of 52 patients who underwent two surgical procedures, namely, removal of hematoma in basal ganglo-region by keyhole neuroendoscopy under frontal ultrasound guidance and removal of hematoma by craniotomy microsurgery. They were divided into the endoscopic surgery group and the microsurgery group. In the endoscopic surgery group, 26 patients underwent removal of hematoma in basal ganglo-region by keyhole neuroendoscopy under frontal ultrasound guidance.In the microsurgery group, 26 cases were treated with craniotomy microsurgery for hematoma removal. The clearance rate of surgical hematoma, surgical safety, GCS score, GOS score, nerve fiber injury and postoperative complications were observed in the two groups 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery.To observe and analyze whether endoscopic surgery group has advantages in improving hematoma clearance rate and efficacy
To compare the prognosis of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage treated by two different surgical methods, and to clarify the therapeutic effect of minimally invasive surgery, so as to find a better surgical method that can reduce surgical trauma and mortality and improve the prognosis of patients