Previous studies of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) have suggested that conscious patients may be misdiagnosed as unconscious up to 40% of the time when traditional qualitative bedside examination is used (Schnakers et al. 2009, Van Erp et al. 2015, Fins and Bernat 2018). Given the well-established prognostic relevance of early behavioral recovery of consciousness for long-term functional outcomes (Giacino and Kalmar 1997, Giacino 2004, Portaccio et al. 2018, Faugeras et al. 2018, Pincherle et al. 2019), whether or not a patient is considered to be conscious is often the primary determinant of whether life-sustaining therapy is continued and neurorehabilitation is offered. Recent advances in neuroimaging and electrophysiologic neurotechnologies, including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG), have yielded novel methods to aid in detecting and predicting emergence of consciousness in patients with brain injuries. Despite these unprecedented research advances, little is known about ethical concerns surrounding these novel neurotechnologies, about the phenomenological, ontological and ethical valence of conscious states of being without behaving revealed through their lens, or about the attitudes of clinicians, researchers, patients and caregivers regarding their responsible implementation. This study aims to fill these crucial knowledge gaps and to support the development of an evidence-based strategy for ensuring responsible research and translation of novel neurotechnologies to aid in the detection of consciousness and prediction of recovery after brain injury.
This study aims to develop an ethical approach to developing and deploying novel neurotechnologies to aid in the detection of consciousness and prediction of recovery after brain injury.