In this study, 120 subjects from the University of Rochester enrolling site will be randomized (1:1) to conventional AF management vs. Abbott ICM- guided AF management following ablation for persistent AF. Subjects will be followed for 15 months including a 3 month blanking period following AF ablation. The study subject population will include subjects with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (per 2019 HRS guidelines definition: an episode of AF that terminates spontaneously or with intervention in less than seven days) or persistent atrial fibrillation (sustained AF episode lasting more than 7 days, but less than 1 year), according to current guideline indications for persistent AF ablation and Abbott ICM implantation. The Abbott ICM incorporates a mobile app (myMerlin) that allows early detection of AF recurrence through patient-triggered remote transmissions and correlation with symptoms based on subclinical AF (SCAF) and patient-triggered remote transmissions. Future FDA-approved Abbott ICM devices using the same functionality may also be utilized in this study. This is a Phase 4 study, and we are comparing two management strategies that are currently employed in clinical practice.
To prospectively investigate the efficacy of an insertable cardiac monitor-guided atrial fibrillation (AF) management in reducing subsequent AF burden in patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF undergoing atrial catheter ablation (CA).