The present study was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography from January 2013 to December 2018 were eligible for this study if they had three-vessel disease, which was defined as more than 50% stenosis in three major epicardial coronary arteries, left anterior descending, left circumﬂex, and right coronary artery. There were no pre-specified exclusion criteria. The choice of PCI, CABG, or MT was mainly followed the guidelines and based on clinical and angiographic features, physical condition (comorbidities, malignant tumor, frailty, etc.), complexity, and was discussed by physicians and surgeons, combined with the choice of patients. The PCI strategy and stent type were left to the physician's discretion.~The primary endpoint were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which were a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, or stroke. Clinical information of in-hospital outcome was obtained by reviewing medical records. Follow-up was completed by survey via telephone, letter, or hospital visit. All patients had at least one follow-up visit.
The long-term outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical therapy (MT) alone for triple-vessel disease (TVD) patients is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of TVD patients among these three treatment strategies, to find out the most appropriate treatment methods for these patients.