Background:~Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation (PNFS) has been utilized for the treatment of facial pain for around 60 years, and the commercial devices needed to deliver PNFS have been available for around 30 years. The safety and efficacy of the procedure has been demonstrated by various uncontrolled observational studies. It serves as a part of daily neurosurgical practice for selected patients in UHN Toronto Western Hospital. This therapeutic modality involves subcutaneous implantation of electrodes in the vicinity of trigeminal nerve branches and application of electrical current using a permanently implanted pulse generator (IPG). Similar to other forms of neuromodulation, PNFS is non-ablative, reversible, adjustable and associated with a relatively low risk of severe complications. A meta-analysis of paresthesia-inducing (PI) PFNS studies in the literature revealed a treatment efficacy of 75% decrease in VAS scores (mean difference: -6.32 out of 10) with PNFS utilization for facial pain. (PMID: 35180702)~Study design:~Patients who underwent a successful unilateral PNFS implantation surgery (trial and permanent implantation) for a facial pain syndrome as a standard of care treatment, will be screened for inclusion after permanent implantable pulse generator (IPG) implantation. Upon consent, the investigators will set up participants' IPG to deliver stimulation with parameters tested during the trial period (paresthesia-inducing parameters) for 2 weeks. The participants will come back to hospital at postoperative week 2 and will be randomized (1:1 ratio) between the two arms of the study (Group 1= sham, Group 2= paresthesia-free (PF) stimulation). Each participant will consecutively experience all two stimulation groups by 2-week periods in a crossover design. Both participants and clinical investigators that will assess the pain will be blind during the study period (between postoperative week 2 and 6). After 6 weeks, the treatment arms will be merged and all the participants will receive any stimulation parameter that they feel more benefit from (best parameter). Outcomes will be assessed 6 and 12 months post-operatively.
Study type: Prospective, double-blinded, double arm, cross-over, randomized controlled clinical trial.~Brief protocol:~Postoperative week 0-2 -> Conventional parameters (parameters tested during trial period)~Postoperative week 2-6 -> Sham stimulation (2 weeks) and paresthesia-free stimulation (2 weeks) double-blind crossover design~Postoperative week 6 - month 12 -> Parameters that patients feel more benefit from