Fifty-two children with ULCP were recruited from the Physical Therapy Outpatient Clinic of the College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, King Khalid Hospital, and a tertiary referral hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia. Their age ranged between 10 and 16 years, were functioning at levels I or II according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System, and had spasticity levels 1 or 1+ per the Modified Ashworth Scale. Children were excluded if they had fixed deformities, underwent neuromuscular or orthopedic surgery in the last 12 months, submitted to BOTOX injection in the past 6 months, had attentional neglect, and if they had cardiopulmonary problems that could be exacerbated by exercise.~Outcome measures~Gait-symmetry Indices: Gait symmetry indices (Spatial and temporal) were measured through the portable GAITRite system.~Dynamic balance: The directional dynamic limit of stability (forward, backward, paretic, and non-paretic) and overall limit of stability were assessed using the Biodex balance system.~Locomotor capacity: This was assessed through the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), the Timed Up and Down Stair test (TUDS), and the 10-meter Shuttle Run Test (10mSRT).~Both groups were trained for one hour, three times a week, for 12 successive weeks. The split-belt treadmill walking group performed repetitive split-belt treadmill training with an error-augmentation strategy (i.e., exaggeration of the initial step-length asymmetry). The control group received the standard rehabilitation program, which comprised advanced balance training, and gait training exercises, postural and flexibility exercises, strength training exercises.
This study was designed to investigate the effect of repeated split-belt treadmill waking practice on gait symmetry, dynamic balance control, and locomotor capacity in adolescents with unilateral cerebral palsy (ULCP). Fifty-two children with ULCP were randomly allocated to the split-belt treadmill walking (n = 26; undergone split-elt treadmill training or the Control group (n =23, received standard rehabilitation program). Both groups were assessed for gait symmetry, dynamic balance control, and locomotor capacity pre and post-treatment.