Background Approximately 5~10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been reported as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in the contemporary clinical setting. Although those with MINOCA have a better prognosis than with obstructive coronary artery disease, several observational studies continuously reported that patients with MINOCA showed comparable outcomes. One plausible explanation of this discrepancy is the heterogeneous and variable definition of MINOCA. Possible causes of MINOCA include plaque erosion and/or rupture, vasospasm, and CMD. Therefore, it is natural that heterogeneous pathophysiology of MINOCA causes diagnostic challenges and proper management.~Recently, there have been efforts for establishing the diagnosis of MINOCA and standardizing the systematic management according to the cause of MINOCA. According to the AHA scientific statement, patients who suspected MINOCA have been recommended to perform multimodality approach, including intravascular imaging (i.e., OCT). Although non-invasive methods, such as N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography (PET), can be used for evaluating the CMD, invasive coronary physiologic assessment using pressure-temperature wire has been recommended. CMD has been known as a major cause of MINOCA, and it may be required specific treatment.~Nevertheless, there has no data on the outcomes of MINOCA with or without CMD. Therefore, the aim of CMD-MINOCA sought to assess the MINOCA patients regarding the latest clinical pathway for diagnosis of CMD and evaluate their clinical outcomes at 2 years.
To compare clinical outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) according to the coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT), invasive and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment.