A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. This clinical improvement is associated with functional changes in the peri-lesional areas on resting-state functional MRI. The investigator team hypothesizes that in some patients with chronic neurological symptoms of stroke, investigator team will observe a favorable response to subcutaneous mepivacaine injection.~The team will include patients with clinically significant sequelae of ischemic stroke, as was the case with the initial patient. In addition,~The team hypothesizes that the mechanism of action is not specific to the visual cortex, and therefore should not be limited to visual scotomas~It is also preferable to consider only deficits that can be objectively quantified in a sufficiently reliable way to be able to evaluate the effect of the treatment~The investigator teamwill therefore include patients with sequelae of at least one of the following three types:~motor deficit: score =< 56 on the Fugl-Meyer scale, minimal deficit allowing to observe an improvement of 4 points~aphasia: score >= 4 on the Aphasia Rapid Test (ART) , minimal deficit allowing to observe an improvement of 4 points~visual scotoma: observable on a clinical assessment of the visual field on confrontation~Only patients more than 30 days after the occurrence of the stroke will be included. Indeed, the rapid recovery phase after a stroke lasts about 3 weeks and it is difficult to interpret rapid clinical changes and to attribute them to the treatment (since investigator team do not know the time of onset of the effect of mepivacaine) over this temporal period.~Mepivacaine will be administered as a single injection, subcutaneously, at a dose of 3 mL of mepivacaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL), or 60mg. If mepivacaine is effective, research participants will experience a temporary reduction in neurological symptoms.~Time course of experiment~Signing of consent~Verification of inclusion and exclusion criteria (1h)~ECG for all patients~Urine dipstick if female of childbearing age~Motor, language and visual field scales, depending on the deficit(s) present~Blood sampling~Evaluation of the neurological deficit before treatment (1h)~VAS to evaluate the intensity of symptoms by the patient~NIHSS~MRI n°1 (duration 45 min to 1h)~Administration of mepivacaine 7 Evaluation of the neurological deficit after treatment, at T= 30 +/- 15 minutes after administration (duration 1h)~Motor, language and visual field scales, depending on the deficit(s) present~VAS to evaluate the intensity of the symptoms by the patient~NIHSS~8/ MRI n°2 (duration 30 to 45min) 1h30 after administration 9/ Call of the patient 1 week later for follow-up of SAEs and evaluation of the duration of the effect, if any.~Brain imaging~MRI will be performed on a SIEMENS 3 Tesla machine, without injection of contrast medium. The duration of the MRI will be approximately 45 minutes to one hour for MRI n°1 (baseline) and 30 to 45 minutes for MRI n°2 performed after the injection of mepivacaine.~MRI acquisitions will include the following sequences:~T1 (only during MRI n°1 in baseline)~FLAIR (only during baseline MRI n°1)~Diffusion sequence (multishell, multiband)~Perfusion sequence (Arterial Spin Labelling, ASL)~Resting state BOLD sequence~Drug treatment :~Mepivacaine will be administered:~Subcutaneously~In the shoulder on the non-dominant side, or on the non-deficient side in case of hemiplegia~Dose: 3 mL of mepivacaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL), or 60mg~With at disposal~Resuscitation equipment (in particular, a source of oxygen)~lipid emulsion to be administered in case of intoxication with clinical signs of neurotoxicity or cardiotoxicity~Genetic samples :~The gene coding for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is of particular interest. BDNF is a protein that contributes to neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation, participates in the creation of new synapses and influences the survival of existing neurons. It is thus currently considered as a crucial element influencing brain plasticity . This could also be an explanatory factor in identifying responders to mepivacaine.
A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. This clinical improvement is associated with functional changes in the peri-lesional areas on resting-state functional MRI.~The investigator team hypothesizes that in some patients with chronic neurological symptoms of stroke, the investigator team will observe a favorable response to subcutaneous mepivacaine injection.