When the studies in the literature including the mini-sling procedure and the laparoscopic buch colposuspension procedure are examined, it is seen that both methods are successful in the surgical treatment of stress urinery incontinence (SUI), but there is no study in which both procedures have been found to be superior to each other in terms of efficacy and safety. The aim of this study is to compare the minisling suburethral sling and laparoscopic buch colposuspension application in terms of efficacy and side effects in patients who will undergo surgical treatment due to genuine SUI. Investigators planned to measure patients' Kings Health Questionary and Prolapse Quality of Life test at first and 6 months after the surgery and to determine how the operation affects the quality of life.
When the studies in the literature including the mini-sling procedure and the laparoscopic buch colposuspension procedure are examined, it is seen that both methods are successful in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but there is no study in which both procedures have been found to be superior to each other in terms of efficacy and safety. The aim of this study is to compare the minisling suburethral sling and laparoscopic buch colposuspension application in terms of efficacy and side effects in patients who will undergo surgical treatment due to genuine SUI.