Use two pelvic floor treatment devices to treat urinary incontinence, collect relevant questionnaires and pelvic floor muscle strength, and compare the two treatment devices.
Enrolled patients with urinary incontinence in Peking University People's Hospital, Wuhan People's Hospital, Zhongshan People's Hospital, and Jiangsu Maternity and Child Health Hospital in the Department of Gynecology, and collected baseline data. The random number table was used to divide the period into observation group and control group. The observation group was treated with a new type of pelvic floor rehabilitation therapy device PHENIX U4+, and the control group was treated with a traditional pelvic floor electrical stimulation therapy device. Follow-up observations during the treatment period and at the end of the treatment, 3 months and 6 months, the main follow-up content includes 1h pad test, 72-hour urination diary, modified Oxford muscle strength classification diagnosis, urinary incontinence-related questionnaires, new equipment inspections, etc. , Track and compare the treatment effect.