The global burden of periimplantitis is expected to rise with the increasing popularity of dental implants as a replacement option. While many therapeutic interventions have been proposed, none have been proven superior. Surgical therapy is often indicated to gain access to the plaque infected implant threads and bone defects. Implantoplasty of suprabony defects have shown good results although adverse effects like soft tissue recession are common.~Thin mucosa results in compromised outcomes following various surgical interventions around implants with increased recession and aesthetic failures. It has also been associated with increased marginal bone loss and severity of periimplantitis. Application of autogenous connective tissue grafts during surgical therapy of periimplantitis to increase the keratinised mucosa widths or attenuate post-implantoplasty recession showed promising results.~No randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the effects of additional soft tissue augmentation with implantoplasty on periimplantitis lesions have been done so far. In addition, few have evaluated patient reported outcome measures, included non-European subjects and none reported on soft tissue alterations. The effect of soft tissue substitutes on surgical periimplantitis therapy remains unknown.
The key objective of the study is to compare the effects of soft tissue augmentation using a volume stable collagen matrix or autogenous connective tissue graft or no soft tissue augmentation in addition to bone grafting/implantoplasty in patients who undergo surgical therapy of peri-implantitis with respect to clinical resolution of the infection.