The investigators aim for this study to represent community-based, participatory research which is accessible, effective, understandable, and minimizing of stigma. Prior to conducting the study, the investigators will develop a community advisory board, consisting of practitioners who have expertise with the development and delivery of the intervention material and study population. Advisory board members will review the study materials and provide feedback for refining the study via meetings with the Principle Investigator. In addition, the investigators will hold a focus group composed of members of the community who have prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes and who are interested in contributing to the study design. The focus group participants will review the study materials and provide feedback for improvement in understandability, minimizing stigma, effectiveness, access and relatability to the general public. Content from the community advisory board meetings and focus group will be used to inform the study design and will not be used for dissemination of data.~For the study implementation, the investigators will distribute online questionnaires on Amazon's Mechanical Turk and use CloudResearch service to recruit participants and manage the online project. Amazon's Mechanical Turk hosts research opportunities, called Human Intelligence Tasks, to online workers. To distribute our surveys to this participant pool the investigators will embed our Qualtrics survey link in each Human Intelligence Tasks. The description of study purpose, time commitment, and research method will be available to the online workers who meet the inclusion criteria set on CloudResearch.~Participants will be assessed for eligibility (see below) via a qualtrics survey sent via Amazon Mechanical turk. As the eligibility process screens for risk of diabetes and assesses perceived stress, socioeconomic indicators, health status, and state anxiety, participants will also complete an initial consent form prior to eligibility screening. This process generates three distinct participant groups: study 1 (Randomized Control Trial), study 2 (Cross-Sectional) and study 3 (Sub-study). The summary of measures given to each group is outlined in Table 1 below.~Study 1 (Randomized Control Trial): Participants will complete pre-intervention measures to assess individual differences (diabetes risk, diabetes program prevention participation, socioeconomic status, subjective social standing, co-morbidities, health status, illness perceptions, self-efficacy, and perceived stress). Participants will be randomized into either a brief standard diabetes education intervention or a brief diabetes education and acceptance and commitment therapy intervention. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-informed materials will retain facts about the condition, but will modify health messaging (adapted from the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention's National Diabetes Prevention Program) to clarify common inaccurate illness perceptions, reduce body size discrimination, and encourage psychological flexibility through framing illness perceptions, controllability awareness (i.e. ability to distinguish modifiable from unmodifiable components), non-judgmental awareness of what is occurring, willingness to allow experiences to occur, and the ability to step back from cognitions, acting according to personal values. Following, participants will complete post-intervention measures to assess psychosocial variables (i.e. stress perceptions, treatment expectations and intentions to engage, motivation and activation, illness perceptions, acute stress, diabetes distress, diabetes locus of control, self-efficacy, controllability awareness, psychological flexibility, and self-efficacy).
The investigators will evaluate whether a brief intervention (i.e. a workbook and video presenting educational information and activities materials for diabetes prevention) that incorporates principles drawn from focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy frameworks impact positive and negative affect, stress perceptions, treatment expectations and intentions to engage, motivation and activation, illness perceptions, stress, diabetes distress, weight stigma internalization, controllability awareness, psychological flexibility, and self-efficacy - compared to standard diabetes prevention education materials.