Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has reduced the age of diagnosis of permanent childhood hearing loss from several years down to several weeks. While this is highly desirable, the early diagnosis raises challenges for the audiologists who manage these infants. The challenges are due to a lack of relevant audiological information, particularly about an infant's ability to discriminate between different speech sounds, and, for infants with Auditory Neuropathy, their degree of hearing impairment, which is required to make key management decisions. The missing information causes intervention delays at several time-critical points along the standard hearing care pathway that could seriously affect speech and language development for the infant, with life-long social, educational and employment consequences. The goal of this trial is to assess whether the addition of audiological information provided by fNIRS assessments can address these challenges for audiologists who care for infants with different types of hearing loss and at the different critical decision points in the care pathway.~A pool of at least 40 experienced audiologists will be recruited to participate in the study. In addition, infants with different types and degree of hearing loss, and at the different critical points in their care pathway will be recruited to provide fNIRS test results. For each infant, a group of ten paediatric audiologists will be randomly selected from the large pool and will be provided with anonymised audiological test results. Each audiologist will receive the current test results of the infant twice, once with, and once without the additional fNIRS test results, with 2 months between. Half (5 randomly selected) will receive the standard plus additional fNIRS test results before the standard-alone results and the other half in reverse order. The audiologists will be asked, via a questionnaire, to make clinical decisions relevant to the infant's point in the hearing care pathway and to rate their confidence in their decisions on a sliding scale.~Infants will be recruited for fNIRS tests at each of four points in the care pathway (after diagnosis, after first hearing aid provision, when optimal hearing aid program is established, and after cochlear implantation. The critical management decisions at these four points are, respectively: Is a hearing aid needed?; Is the hearing aid optimally programmed for the infant?; Would the infant be better off with a cochlear implant instead of their hearing aid?; and Is the cochlear implant programmed optimally for the infant?~Parents/guardians will also be surveyed about their experience with the fNIRS test.
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether hearing test results using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) will help to fast-track early intervention for infants born with a hearing loss. fNIRS is a method of imaging brain activity using light. The main questions are:~Can audiologists make more confident decisions about the optimal interventions at different critical points in the hearing care pathway when they are given additional fNIRS information compared to when they have standard audiology test results alone?~Is the experience of their infant having an fNIRS test acceptable and comfortable for the parents or care givers?