Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is a Class I, Level A secondary prevention program that significantly reduces reinfarction and mortality rates in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors. Yet, fewer than 30% of eligible cardiac patients participate in and adhere to CR programs in the United States. One promising avenue for increasing CR participation and adherence is a telehealth-enhanced hybrid CR (THCR) model that combines telehealth, clinic- and home-based CR. Several expert groups have strongly endorsed hybrid CR models that integrate telehealth (i.e., mobile apps, remote monitoring devices) because of their ability to offer the best of both worlds (i.e., in-clinic supervision/safety and at-home convenience) while also promoting real-time patient-provider communication and reimbursement as a telemedicine service. Despite its potential, the feasibility of and degree to which THCR improves adherence (e.g., # of completed sessions) and clinical outcomes (e.g., functional capacity) relative to traditional CR requires additional investigation. To understand the feasibility of THCR, the investigator will conduct a single center, two-arm, 1:1 parallel group randomized pilot study comparing THCR with traditional CR among ACS patients (N=40) to evaluate the feasibility (e.g., recruitment, adherence) of conducting an adequately powered randomized controlled trial.
This study investigates the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial of telehealth-enhanced hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (THCR) compared with traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors. THCR is a novel, hybrid model that targets the same core components as traditional CR (e.g., exercise training, patient education, and risk factor management), but uses a mixture of telehealth, clinic-, and home-based activities to offer 24 CR sessions (5 clinic-based + 19 home-based) over 12 weeks.