Burnout is a manifestation of chronic work stress characterized by emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and diminished self-efficacy. The burden of burnout is alarming, especially within healthcare where it affects at least one-third of the workforce, including clinicians and support staff. The causes of healthcare worker burnout are multifactorial, including systemic pressures (e.g., intensification of charting duties, prolonged work hours with circadian and work-life disruptions, exposure to trauma), and unit-level characteristics (e.g., value misalignment and mistrust between team members and leadership, and lack of supportive services or resources). The modification of these systemic factors requires the lengthy action of stakeholders that have competing agendas. In the meantime, the healthcare workforce remains in urgent need of practical, adaptable, and meaningful solutions to start addressing this pervasive problem. In this conundrum, interventions aimed at improving leader-staff relations - a more readily modifiable target than systemic pressures- have reduced the most proximal emotional effects of burnout. However, new approaches are required so that leadership-focused interventions generate and sustain impactful organizational transformations. The need for such interventions is even more significant amid the exploding levels of work stress related to the COVID-19 crisis.~The objective of this five-year proposal is to conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial (CRT) across 10 OHSU primary care clinics to evaluate the effectiveness and process of a supervisor-focused intervention to reduce burnout. The intervention titled Work-life Check-ins will create a process designed to reduce burnout by boosting supervisor support, trust, and value alignment, increasing awareness of appropriate services and resources, and addressing workflow or work-life problems. The central hypothesis is that employees at the six clinics randomly assigned to the intervention will have reduced burnout at the 12- month follow-up compared to waitlist-control clinics. The investigators expect that the intervention will reduce burnout based on our preliminary studies and the integration of evidence-based techniques, including supportive supervision training, goal setting, feedback sessions, and quality improvement cycles. This proposal will accomplish the following specific aims.~Aim 1: Determine the Work-life Check-ins' effectiveness on burnout and secondary outcomes.~The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of the Work-life Check-ins via surveys conducted among eligible employees (N=552 across the 10 clinics). As the primary outcome, it will be surveyed burnout at baseline and after 12 months. As secondary outcomes, we will examine safety and well-being variables (e.g., turnover intentions, values alignment, supervisor support and safety climate,).~Aim 2: Identify organizational changes produced by the Work-life check-ins. The investigators will conduct a multi-method process evaluation, including implementation metrics (e.g., number and frequency of check-ins) and in-depth interviews with supervisors and workers after implementation. The process evaluation will reveal the extent to which the intervention influenced the adoption of environmental, procedural or educational burnout control and prevention measures.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and process of frequent supervisor-employee check-ins in reducing burnout among employees of primary care clinics in Portland, OR. Healthcare workers are at risk for burnout and associated adverse health and safety outcomes, including chronic diseases and occupational injuries. Not only does burnout affect healthcare workers, but burnout also affects the quality of patient care. The proposed study will create a check-in process between supervisors and healthcare workers, which addresses supervisor support, awareness of services and resources, and work-life balance. The Work-life Check-ins project expects to see reduced burnout among employees participating in the check-ins intervention compared to those in the control group.