This is prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentre trial.~OBJECTIVES~Primary objective Compare the results of 3 different strategies for the management of patients with mild acute pancreatitis (AP) and to analyze differences in satisfaction patients and economic costs.~METHODS~Patients with mild AP will be randomly in three groups: group A: outpatient treatment, group B: medical home care and group C: hospitalization.~The primary and several secondary endpoints will be obtained:~Treatment failure rate (the primary endpoint).~Serum amylase, lipase, electrolytes, BUN (blood urea nitrogen), creatinine, liver function tests, and full blood count at hospital admission, 24 hours and 72 hours.~Relapse pain.~Diet intolerance.~Systemic complications including hemodynamic instability, renal failure, intensive care admission, surgery, radiological and endoscopic procedures.~Pain and Analgesic requirement.~Local complications including pancreatic necrosis, abscess, pseudocyst.~Health costs~Patient satisfaction
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common reason for hospitalization among gastrointestinal diseases in U.S.. The costs caused by severe AP are higher than mild AP. Nevertheless, approximately 70% of hospital admissions for AP are mild cases, if health cost saving is to be realized, it would be by lowering the cost of managing patients with mild AP without affecting patient's safety and satisfaction.~With the PADI-1 study, where it was possible to confirm the benefits of an early diet, the rapid recovery of patients with mild AP and the reduction of hospital costs, now a new scope is to be given in the treatment of patients with this pathology.~Considering the application of predictive factors of AP severity, and being sure of diagnosing mild AP, a study of home care versus hospitalization for patients with mild AP is proposed. Based on the hypothesis that outpatient care of mild AP patients would be as sage and affective as hospitalization, the aim this study is to campare the results of 3 different strategies of treatment of patients with AP mild. Additionally, satisfaction patient and costs will be analyzed.