In this study, 60 trainees will be divided into 10 teams of 6 participants each, which include two CPR providers, a team leader, a nurse actor, a defibrillator actor with (study groups A and B) or without (control group, C) a coach.~Each team will perform a standardized 10-minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) simulation on a standardized Trauma Hal mannequin (Gaumard Scientific) with a Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT Resources, Rock Hill, SC)/SUSIE simulator(Gaumard Scientific, Miami, FL) with a CPR Feedback device. All participants assigned the role of the coach will receive standardized training as described by Cheng et al, 2018.~Study group A will run the simulation with the CPR coach figure standing next to the defibrillator; study group B will run the simulation with the CPR coach free to move around the scenario; control group C will run the simulation without the CPR coach. During the simulations, an experienced facilitator and a simulation technician will be present to conduct and oversee the progress of the activities.~All activities of all teams will be recorded with cameras and microphones. At the end of each simulation, there will be a debriefing conducted by an expert facilitator to make the simulation experience complete but will not be considered in the study.~All recorded videos will be viewed by 4 experts who will score the leader's performance and the team's performance. The leader's performance will be evaluated by using the Resuscitation Team Leader Evaluation Scale (RTLE) (Grant et al,2012). The Team's overall performance will be evaluated by the Clinical Performance Toll (CPT)(Donoghue et al, 2010).
Previous studies reported that the introduction of the role of the CPR Coach in resuscitation teams led to an increase in the adherence of CPR to AHA guidelines by the team.~To date, the interaction between the CPR Coach and the Team Leader during the performance of CPR remains poorly studied.~In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate whether the interaction between the CPR Coach and the Team Leader brings real benefits to the cognitive engagement of the latter and therefore whether or not his leadership and the overall performance of the team is affected.