This is randomised control trial design with a cluster randomisation, whereby each cluster (a GP surgery) will have a different intervention. As it's a feasibility study, there will only be one cluster per intervention.~Participants will be recruited from 4 local primary care surgeries, and if participants take part, they will have 4 visits, and will be randomly allocation of an intervention arm, or a control arm receiving usual care.~At the start, the participant would have 2 visits of a maximum of 2 hours to the participant's local GP surgery to undergo a variety of tasks and assessments about the participant's well-being, health and physical functioning. That could lead to an 'action plan' that is implemented. The participant will have the 3rd visit after 3 months, and a final (fourth) visit after 12 months. During the 3rd and 4th visit the participant will repeat various tasks and assessments done in visit 1 and 2.~The project comprises different activities in the different GP surgeries. The project compares different approaches that each surgery takes. Generally, each surgery will assess relevant aspects that are associated with 'getting older' and provide support in the coming months. The specific approaches are based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, the World Health Organisation's recommendation and resources for the Integrated Care of Older People (ICOPE) model, the recommendations from the International Conference of Frailty and Sarcopenia Research (ICFSR) and the Functional Fitness test battery. All of these approaches would lead to an 'personal care plan' developed by the medical student, with actions that are specific to the participant's circumstances.
Primary Care General Practitioners (GPs) are always looking at ways to improve the care of older people and ways to prevent older people from losing their independence. Pro-active provision of support often involves lifestyle advice and is a potentially important aspect of that, as it supports older people before acute care is needed. It's preventative caring, rather than reactive caring. But, implementing pro-active care is hampered by the high current workload of acute care, the uncertainty of 'what works' and whether patients are responsive to pro-active care plans. This project will explore different ways of providing pro-active support to older people who could be at risk of losing their independence and requiring frequent acute care. The benefits of pro-active care are arguably the greatest in these individuals.