Below is a dialogue between software developers, the first one used ChatGPT in his solution of code task and makes a comment,   the second one gives him reply on his solution. Write a reply that appropriately answers the comment.

### Comment:
note you can use chatgpt to get a summary of theseit appears that youve provided a set of axioms and relationships pertaining to biological entities, especially anatomical structures and cells. this looks like a part of an ontology, which is a formal way to describe types, properties, and interrelationships of entities in a specific domainin this case, likely biology or anatomy.however, there seems to be a recurring logical issue in your ontology, particularly related to the term coelemic cavity lumen. you have coelemic cavity l### Reply:
not sure its merely a stale uberon importtwo axioms seem responsible for almost all the unsats. caro subclassof bfothis makes caros anatomical entity a material entity. this comes from foodon, and was done as part of a cob compatibility commit shortly before their last release. this was removed in a later commit, but only _after_ the release.. logical definition of envos environment associated with an animal part or small animal envoif i understand correctly, the problem is that this axiom makes any anatomical entity uberon that is part of some metazoa so, all of them? equivalent to envos environment associated with..., which is also classified elsewhere ultimately as a _material entity_  thereby causing a disjointness violation for all the anatomical entities that happen to be immaterial.this seems to come from this envo commit in august 