title: Favicon.js vs favicon.ico in static() with staticCache() using Connect in nodeJS?
body: <p>I just rewrote my nodeJS server code to take advantage of Connect's modular structure. That said, in looking at some of the code, I feel like using the favicon.js module to serve the favicon.ico file wouldn't be as efficient as using the static.js with staticCache.js modules (since I only have a couple static files that would never be replaced by any others in the cache). Would anybody be willing to confirm/deny this? I wouldn't be surprised if I'm just completely mistaken, hence my wanting to check. </p>
  
  <p>Here's a link to the github page with all the modules for convenience's sake: <a href="https://github.com/senchalabs/connect/tree/master/lib/middleware" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/senchalabs/connect/tree/master/lib/middleware</a></p>
  
  <p>Best,<br>Sami</p>