Madhya Pradesh High CourtRajkumar @ Tikle vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 July, 2021Author:Anand PathakBench:Anand Pathak1\n       THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH\n                 Cr.A. No. 9484/2018\n           Rajkumar @ Tikle Vs. State of M.P.\n\nGwalior Bench:\nDated :01.07.2021\n\n      Shri D.R. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant.\n\n      Shri Kuldeep Singh, learned PP for the respondent/State.Matter is heard through Video Conferencing.Heard on I.A. No. 20971/2020, this is fifth application underSection 389 (1)of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence filed in respect\n\nof appellant.The appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:-Section       Conviction           Fine        Default of\n                                                       fine\n   307 of IPC 5 years RI            Rs.1,000/-       06 months\n   (2 count)\n   333 of IPC     2 years RI       Rs.1,000/-        06 months\n   332 of IPC     1 year RI        Rs.1,000/-        06 months\n   25(1-B)(ad) of 1 year RI        Rs.1,000/-        06 months\n   Arms ActIt is the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that\n\ntrial court erred in convicting the appellant and awarding jail\n\nsentence. It is further submitted that out of five years of jail\n\nsentence, the appellant already sufferred three years and two months\n\nof incarceration. Looking to the period of incarceration and the fact\n\nthat the applicant is not a habitual offender, suffered implication2THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHCr.A. No. 9484/2018Rajkumar @ Tikle Vs. State of M.P.\n\nbecause of co-accused Pawan. One eye witness/injured witness has\n\nnot been examined by the prosecution. Looking to the challenging\n\nsituation of COVID-19 pandemic, his case may be considered for\n\nsuspension of sentence. Fine amount has already been deposited.\n\nHearing of appeal shall take some time to conclude. Appellant would\n\nnot be a source of embarrassment or harassment to the complainant.\n\nHe would not move in the vicinity of complainant party. He further\n\nintends to perform community service voluntarily by serving the\n\nenvironment and National/Social cause by contributing his part\n\nvoluntarily to purge his misdeeds and to reform himself and to\n\nindugle in creative pursuits. Therefore, he suspension of sentence\n\nmay be granted.Learned PP for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for its\n\ndismissal.Heard the learned counsel for the parties and record perused\n\nthrough V.C.\n\n      Considering the overall facts and circumstance of the case and\n\nperiod of custody, without commenting on the merits of the case as\n\nthere is no possibility of early hearing of this criminal appeal before\n\nthis Court, hence, I.A. No. 20971/2020 is allowed subject to deposit3THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHCr.A. No. 9484/2018Rajkumar @ Tikle Vs. State of M.P.\n\nof fine amount and it is ordered that on furnishing a personal bond of\n\nRs.50,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one\n\nsolvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned\n\ntrial Court, appellant's jail sentence shall remain suspended till\n\ndisposal of this appeal and he be released on bail. The appellant is\n\nfurther directed to remain present before the Registry of this Court\n\non 27.09.2021 and, thereafter, on such subsequent dates as may be\n\nfixed by the Registry.After release, the appellant is further directed to strictly\n\nfollow all the instructions which may be issued by the Central\n\nGovernment/State Government or Local Administration for\n\ncombating the COVID -19 pandemic.,rn~ }kjk muds vfHkHkk"kd }kjk nh xbZ opu ds vuqlkj ;g Hkh ;g\nfunZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkosnd 05 ikS/kksa dk ¼ Qy nsus okys isM+ vFkok\nuhe@ihiy½ jksi.k djsxk rFkk mls vius vkl iMksl esa isM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds\nfy, ckM+ yxkus dh O;oLFkk djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/ks lqjf{kr jg ldsA\nvkosnd dk ;g drZO; gS fd u dsoy ikS/kksa dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa\niks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A ^^o`{kkjksi.k ds lkFk] o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA"^^\n       vkosnd fo'ks"kr% 6&8 QhV ÅWaps ikS/ks@isM+ksa dks yxk;sxk rkfd os\n'kh?kz gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus ds fy,] vkosnd\ndks fjgk fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj lacaf/kr fopkj.k\nU;k;ky; ds le{k o`{kksas@ikS/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh QksVks çLrqr djuk gksxsa A\nrRi'pkr~] fopkj.k ds lekiu rd gj rhu eghus esa vkosnd ds                      }kjk\nfopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izxfr fjiksVZ çLrqr dh tk,xh A4THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHCr.A. No. 9484/2018Rajkumar @ Tikle Vs. State of M.P.\n\n      o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk drZO; gS\nD;ksafd i;kZoj.k {kj.k ds dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky;\nvuqikyu ds ckjs esa vkosnd }kjk fn[kkbZ xbZ fdlh Hkh ykijokgh dks utj\nvankt ugh dj ldrk gSA blfy, vkosnd dks isM+ksa dh çxfr vkSj\nvkosnd }kjk vuqikyu ds laca/k esa ,d fjiksVZ çLrqr djus ds fy, funZsf'kr\nfd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkonsd }kjk fd;s x;s vuqikyu dh ,d la{kfIr fjiskVZ\nbl U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rhu ekg esa ¼vxys N% eghuksa ds fy,½ j[kh\ntk;sxh ftls fd ^^funsZ'k ^^ 'kh"kZ ds varxZr j[kk tk,xkA\n      o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosnd dh vksj ls dh xbZ\ndksbZ Hkh pwd vkosnd dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh gSA\n      vkosnd dks viuh ilan ds LFkku ij bu ikS/kksa@isMksa dks jksius dh\nLora=rk gksxh] ;fn og bu jksis x;s isMksa dh Vªh xkMZ ;k ckM+ yxkdj j{kk\ndjuk pkgrk gS] vU;Fkk vkosnd dks o`{kksa ds jksi.k ds fy, rFkk muds\nlqj{kk mik;ksa ds fy, vko';d [kpsZ ogu djuk gksxsaA\n      bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g funsZ'k ,d ijh{k.k izdj.k ds rkSj ij fn, x, gSa\nrkfd fgalk vkSj cqjkbZ ds fopkj dk izfrdkj] l`tu ,oa izd`fr ds lkFk\n,dkdkj gksus ds ek/;e ls lkeaktL; LFkkfir fd;k tk ldsA orZeku esa ekuo\nvfLrRo ds vko';d vax ds :i esa n;k] lsok] izse ,oa d:a.kk dh izd`fr dks\nfodflr djus dh vko';drk gS D;ksafd ;g ekuo thou dh ewyHkwr izo`fr;ka gSa\nvkSj ekuo vfLrRo dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, budk iquthZfor gksuk vko';d gSA\n\n      ^^;g iz;kl dsoy ,d o`{k ds jksi.k dk iz'u u gksdj\ncfYd ,d fopkj ds vadqj.k dk gSA" "It is expected from the applicant that he shall submit\n\nphotographs by downloading the mobile application (App)\n\nprepared at the instance of High Court for monitoring the5THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHCr.A. No. 9484/2018Rajkumar @ Tikle Vs. State of M.P.\n\n            plantation though satellite/Geo-tagging.I.A. No.20971 stands allowed and disposed of.\n\n                     Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for\n\n            compliance.Certified copy as per rules.(Anand Pathak)\n                                                              Judge\nneetu\n        SMT NEETU\n        SHASHANK\n        2021.07.02\n        12:17:58\n        +05'30'