Jharkhand High CourtNandana Roy And Anr vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr on 6 November, 2017Author:Anil Kumar ChoudharyBench:Anil Kumar ChoudharyIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                 A.B.A. No. 5872 of 2017

            1. Nandana Roy
            2. Showkat Hussain Shah                         ...        Petitioners
                                            Versus
           1. The State of Jharkhand
           2. Bipad Taran Roy                               ...       Opp. Parties


        Coram:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY


        For the Petitioner             : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Adv.
        For the State                  : Addl. P.P.

03 /06.11.2017Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this
            Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with
            Lalpur P.S. Case No. 241 of 2017 (G.R. No. 4234 of 2017) registered
            undersections 341,323,354,379,504&34of the Indian Penal
            Code.Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
            learned Addl. P.P. for the State.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
            petitioner no.1 is a lady and no offence is made out undersection
            354I.P.C against her. The informant is the father of the petitioner
            no.1 and the petitioner no.2 is the son-in-law of the informant. The
            allegation against the petitioner no.2 is that he tore the clothes of the
            informant's daughter- in- law and snatched one chain from her. It is,
            further, submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all
            false. The petitioner is ready and willing to pay the interim
            compensation to the informant -opposite party no.2. Hence, the
            petitioners may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory
            bail.Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
            discussed above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail
            to the above named petitioners. Hence, in the event of their arrest or
            surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order,
            they shall be released on bail on the condition of deposit of Rs.
            5000/- by way of demand draft drawn in favour of the Bipad Taran
            Ray by petitioner no.2 without prejudice to his defence, as interim
         compensation for the victim - informant and furnishing bail bond of
        Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the
        like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st
        Class, Ranchi, in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No. 241 of 2017
        (G.R. No. 4234 of 2017), subject to the conditions laid down undersection 438 (2)Cr. P.C.
                     In case, the petitioner no.2 deposits the interim
        compensation amount in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st
        Class, Ranchi, the court is directed to issue notice to the victim -
        informant- Bipad Taran Roy and release the said demand draft in his
        favour, after proper identification.(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-