Delhi High CourtMunna Lal vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) ... on 16 December, 2020$~37\n*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n                                                  Date of decision: 16.12.2020\n+      CRL.M.C. 2465/2020\n       MUNNA LAL                                         ..... Petitioner\n                    Through:            Mr. Umesh Gupta, Adv.\n                    versus\n       STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)\n       THOUGH SHO/IO & ANR                      ..... Respondent\n                    Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State\n                              SI Renu\n                              Respondent no.2 and 3 in person\n                              through VC\n       CORAM:\n       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT\n\n                          J U D G M E N T (ORAL)CRL. M.A. 17406/20201.     Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2.     Application is disposed of.CRL.M.C. 2465/20203.     Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for\n\nquashing of FIR No. 257/2013 dated 20.6.2013 registered at PS Sarai\n\nRohilla and all other proceedings arising therefrom.4.     On oral request of learned counsel for petitioner, I hereby implead\n\nMs. Sneh Prabha as respondent no.3. Petitioner is directed to file amended\n\nmemo of parties during the course of the day.CRL.M.C. 2465/2020                                                    Page 1 of 35.    Complainant/respondent no.2 and respondent no.3 are personally\n\npresent in Court through VC and submit that the matter has been settled and\n\nthey do not want to pursue the matter against the petitioner and the present\n\npetition may be allowed.6.    Notice issued.7.    Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and respondent nos.2 &3. With the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for\n\nfinal disposal.8.    The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled\n\ntheir disputes and respondent nos. 2 and 3 have no objection if the present\n\npetition is allowed.9.    Respondent nos.2 & 3are personally present in Court and they have\n\nbeen identified by SI Renu/IO and submits that matter has been settled and\n\nthey do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.10.   Petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable\n\nsettlement vide settlement deed dated 03.03.2020.11.   Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash\n\nFIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioner any\n\nfurther.CRL.M.C. 2465/2020                                                     Page 2 of 312.   For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 257/2013 dated 20.6.2013\n\nregistered at PS Sarai Rohilla and consequent proceedings emanating\n\ntherefrom are quashed.13.   The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.14.   The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)\n                                                    JUDGE\nDECEMBMER 16, 2020\nmsCRL.M.C. 2465/2020                                             Page 3 of 3