Patna High Court - OrdersLadly Khatoon vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 4 December, 2018Author:Sudhir SinghBench:Sudhir SinghIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Criminal Miscellaneous No.72290 of 2018
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2016 Thana- Jehanabad Complaint Case District-
                                                        Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Ladly Khatoon, W/o Late Ashan, R/o Village-Panch Mahla Tarula, P.S.
                 Jantipura, District-Murabad at Present Panchmahla Bichligali, Churihara
                 Ghat, P.O., P.S. and District-Jehanabad.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 State Of Bihar & Anr

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-12-2018Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                  for the State.The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case

                  registered underSections 323,498A,504/34of the Indian Penal

                  Code and ¾ ofDowry Prohibition Act.Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture

                  upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the

                  petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation

                  of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The

                  petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

                  petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The

                  petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case
             Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72290 of 2018(2) dt.04-12-20182/2ofMd. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors.

                     Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is

                     named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

                     let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender

                     before the learned court below within a period of six weeks

                     from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

                     bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

                     Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Complaint Case No.

                     570 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down underSection 438(2)of the Code of Criminal Procedure.(Sudhir Singh, J)
A.K.V.//-U      T