Uttarakhand High CourtHon'Ble Barin Ghosh vs Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia on 6 October, 2012Author:U.C. DhyaniBench:U.C. DhyaniSPA No. 274 of 2012
With
CLMA (Delay Condonation Application) No. 9182 of 2012
CLMA (Stay Application) No. 9183 of 2012
Hon'ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon'ble U.C. Dhyani, J.Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the
State / appellants.Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for
respondent Nos. 1 to 7.Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent
No.8.There has been considerable delay in
preferring the appeal.          An application for
condonation of delay in preferring the appeal has
been filed. The reason for preferring the appeal is
that the judgment under appeal was passed following
a judgment passed in connection with another writ
petition. That judgment was appealed against and the
Appellate Court has altered the said judgment. That
appears to be the reason for preferring the present
appeal.We, accordingly, find sufficient reason for the
delay in preferring the appeal. We, accordingly,
allow the application for condonation of delay in
preferring the appeal, to which a formal objection has
been filed.The appeal is admitted.Let the appeal be listed on 27th November,
2012. By that time, the State will file an affidavit
indicating the position of the respondents / writ
petitioners in the altered merit list prepared pursuant
to the decision of the Division Bench dated 19th July,
2012.(U.C. Dhyani, J.)     (Barin Ghosh, C.J.)
              06.10.2012
P. SinghSPA No. 275 of 2012With
CLMA (Delay Condonation Application) No. 9186 of 2012
CLMA (Stay Application) No. 9187 of 2012
Hon'ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon'ble U.C. Dhyani, J.Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the
State / appellants.Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for
respondent Nos. 1 and 2.Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent
No.3.There has been considerable delay in
preferring the appeal.          An application for
condonation of delay in preferring the appeal has
been filed. The reason for preferring the appeal is
that the judgment under appeal was passed following
a judgment passed in connection with another writ
petition. That judgment was appealed against and the
Appellate Court has altered the said judgment. That
appears to be the reason for preferring the present
appeal.We, accordingly, find sufficient reason for the
delay in preferring the appeal. We, accordingly,
allow the application for condonation of delay in
preferring the appeal, to which a formal objection has
been filed.The appeal is admitted.Let the appeal be listed on 27th November,
2012. By that time, the State will file an affidavit
indicating the position of the respondents / writ
petitioners in the altered merit list prepared pursuant
to the decision of the Division Bench dated 19th July,
2012.(U.C. Dhyani, J.)     (Barin Ghosh, C.J.)
              06.10.2012
P. SinghSPA No. 278 of 2012With
CLMA (Delay Condonation Application) No. 9207 of 2012
CLMA (Stay Application) No. 9208 of 2012
Hon'ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon'ble U.C. Dhyani, J.Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the
State / appellants.Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for
respondent No. 1.Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent
No.2.There has been considerable delay in
preferring the appeal.         An application for
condonation of delay in preferring the appeal has
been filed. The reason for preferring the appeal is
that the judgment under appeal was passed
following a judgment passed in connection with
another writ petition. That judgment was appealed
against and the Appellate Court has altered the said
judgment. That appears to be the reason for
preferring the present appeal.We, accordingly, find sufficient reason for
the delay in preferring the appeal.              We,
accordingly, allow the application for condonation
of delay in preferring the appeal, to which a formal
objection has been filed.The appeal is admitted.Let the appeal be listed on 27th November,
2012. By that time, the State will file an affidavit
indicating the position of the respondents / writ
petitioners in the altered merit list prepared
pursuant to the decision of the Division Bench
dated 19th July, 2012.(U.C. Dhyani, J.)     (Barin Ghosh, C.J.)
              06.10.2012
P. SinghSPA No. 279 of 2012With
CLMA (Delay Condonation Application) No. 9214 of 2012
CLMA (Stay Application) No. 9215 of 2012
Hon'ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon'ble U.C. Dhyani, J.Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the
State / appellants.Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for
respondent Nos. 1 to 3.Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent
No.4.There has been considerable delay in
preferring the appeal.         An application for
condonation of delay in preferring the appeal has
been filed. The reason for preferring the appeal is
that the judgment under appeal was passed
following a judgment passed in connection with
another writ petition. That judgment was appealed
against and the Appellate Court has altered the said
judgment. That appears to be the reason for
preferring the present appeal.We, accordingly, find sufficient reason for
the delay in preferring the appeal.              We,
accordingly, allow the application for condonation
of delay in preferring the appeal, to which a formal
objection has been filed.The appeal is admitted.Let the appeal be listed on 27th November,
2012. By that time, the State will file an affidavit
indicating the position of the respondents / writ
petitioners in the altered merit list prepared
pursuant to the decision of the Division Bench
dated 19th July, 2012.(U.C. Dhyani, J.)     (Barin Ghosh, C.J.)
              06.10.2012
P. Singh