Delhi District CourtState vs Sh. Noor Mohammad @ Noora on 19 September, 2022CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                            State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                    SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n                                                        DLNE01-000970-2021\n\n\n\n\n     IN THE COURT OF SH. PULASTYA PRAMACHALA\n           ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-03,\n               NORTH-EAST DISTRICT\n            KARKARDOOMA COURTS: DELHI\n\n\n                                        INDEX\nSl. No.                           HEADINGS                                Page Nos.\n     1         Description of Case & Memo of Parties                             2\n     2         The case set up by the Prosecution                              2-3\n     3         Charges                                                         4-5\n     4         Description of Prosecution Evidence                             5-8\n     5         Plea of accused underSection 313Cr.P.C.                         9\n     6         Arguments of Defence & Prosecution                             9-10\n               APPRECIATION OF FACTS AND EVIDENCE\n     7         Unlawful Assembly and Riots                                    10-11\n     8         Identification of accused                                      11-13\n     9         Conclusion and Decision                                          13\n\n\n\n\nPage 1 of 13                                                      (Pulastya Pramachala)\n                                                               ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                               Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                              CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                            State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                    SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n\n\n      Sessions Case No.        :   127/2021\n      Under Section            :   147/148/149/188/435/436/392/34IPCPolice Station           :   Khajuri Khas\n      FIR No.                  :   153/2020\n      CNR No.                  :   DLNE01-000970-2021\n\n     In the matter of: -\n     STATE\n                                     VERSUS\n\n     SH. NOOR Mohammad @ NOORA\n     S/o. Sh. Munna Mauji,\n     R/o. Kalla Cable Wali Gali, Milan Garden,\n     near Mangal Bazar, Khajuri Khas, Delhi\n                                                                         .....Accused\n     Complainants :                        SH. MOHD. HANIF\n                                           S/o. Sh. Abdul Majid,\n                                           R/o. H.No. 90/B, Gali No.2,\n                                           New Mustafabad.\n\n\n     Date of Institution                   : 30.06.2020\n     Date of reserving order               : 14.09.2022\n     Date of pronouncement                 : 19.09.2022\n     Decision                              : Acquitted of all the charges.\n     (Section 437-ACr.P.C. complied with by accused)\n\n     JUDGMENTTHE CASE SET UP BY THE PROSECUTION: -1.   The above named accused has been charge-sheeted by the police\n     for having committed offences punishable underSection\n     147/148/149/188/435/436/392/34IPC.2.   Brief facts of the present case are that on 02.03.2020, FIR was\n     registered on the basis of written complaint dated 29.02.2020Page 2 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                               Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                              CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                            State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                    SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n     (received vide DD No.53-B), made by one Mohd. Hanif, wherein\n     he alleged that his tailoring shop in the name and style of "Prince\n     Tailor", situated in Gali No.4, E-Block, near Adarsh Lakhpat\n     School, Khajuri Khas, main Karawal Nagar Road, Delhi-94, was\n     looted and set on fire by the riotous mob on 24.02.2020, at about\n     05:00 PM. Complainant also alleged that he suffered financial\n     loss to the tune of around Rs.5 lac. He also alleged that at that\n     time there were coat & pant meant for marriage, uniform of mid-day meal, stock of clothes, dresses of other customers and\n     sewing machine, in his shop.3.   During investigation, accused Noor Mohammad @ Noora was\n     identified as one of the members of the mob, which indulged into\n     the riot covering this incident of 24.02.2020. Accordingly,\n     accused was arrested, in the present case. After completion of\n     investigation, on 30.06.2020 a chargesheet was filed before Duty\n     MM (North East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, against accused\n     Noor Mohammad @ Noora, for offences punishable underSection 147/148/149/188/435/436/392/34IPC. On 30.01.2021,\n     ld. CMM (North East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, took\n     cognizance       of      offences        punishable        underSection\n     147/148/149/392/435/436IPC. However, ld. CMM (N/E)\n     declined to take cognizance of offence underSection 188IPC,\n     for want of complaint underSection 195Cr.P.C. Thereafter, on\n     12.02.2021, case was committed to the sessions court. Thereafter,\n     on 29.11.2021, a supplementary chargesheet was filed before ld.CMM (N/E), which was committed to the sessions court vide\n     order dated 06.12.2021.Page 3 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                               Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                               CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                             State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                     SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                 Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n     CHARGES :-4.   On 31.08.2021, charges were framed against accused Noor\n     Mohammad @ Noora for offences punishable underSection\n     143/147/148/392/436IPC read withSection 149IPC, in\n     following terms: -"That on 24.02.2020, at or around 5.00PM, in the area\n         of E-Block, Khajuri Khas, main Karawal Nagar Road, Delhi-\n         110094, within the jurisdiction of PS Khajuri Khas, you being from\n         a particular community alongwith your other associates\n         (unidentified) formed an unlawful assembly, the object whereof was\n         to cause maximum damage to the property and persons belonging\n         to the other community and commit robbery and arson in the shops,\n         houses and other properties of the persons from other community by\n         the use of force or violence in prosecution of the common object of\n         such assembly and thereby committed offences punishable under\n         Section(s) 143/147/148IPCread withSection 149IPC and within\n         my cognizance.Secondly, on the aforesaid date, time and place, you\n         being member of said unlawful assembly in furtherance of your\n         common object alongwith your other associates (unidentified)\n         committed robbery in the shop by the name of "Prince Tailor",\n         situated in Gali No.4, E-Block, near Adarsh Lakhpat School,\n         Khajuri Khas, main Karawal Nagar Road, Delhi-94, belonging to\n         complainant Mohd. Hanif, S/o. Shri Abdul Mazid and thereby\n         committed an offence punishable underSection 392IPC read withSection 149IPC and within my cognizance.Thirdly, on the aforesaid date, time and place, you being\n         member of said unlawful assembly in furtherance of your common\n         object alongwith your other associates (unidentified) committed\n         mischief by fire or explosive substance with the intent to destroy the\n         said shop ("Prince Tailor"), belonging to aforesaid complainant\n         and thereby committed an offence punishable underSection 436IPC read withSection 149IPC and within my cognizance."5.   Thereafter, on 20.07.2022, additional charge was framed against\n     accused Noor Mohammad @ Noora for offence punishable underSection 188IPC, in following terms: -"That, on 24.02.2020 at or around 5.00 p.m. in the area of E-block,\n         Khajuri Khas, main Karawal Nagar Road, Delhi-94, within the\n         jurisdiction of PS Khajuri Khas, you being member of an unlawfulPage 4 of 13                                                  (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                                Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                               CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                             State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                     SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                 Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n         assembly alongwith your other associates (unidentified) was\n         present at aforesaid place, in prosecution of the common object of\n         such unlawful assembly and in violation of the proclamation issued\n         u/s 144 Cr. PC by the competent authority/DCP, North East vide\n         order dated 24.02.2020 bearing no.10094-170 X-1, North East,\n         Delhi dt.24.02.2020, which was duly announced in all the\n         localities of District North East and, thereby you committed\n         offence punishable underSection 188IPC and within my\n         cognizance."DESCRIPTION OF PROSECUTION EVIDENCE :-6.   Prosecution examined 8 witnesses in support of its case, as per\n     following descriptions: -Sl. No. &         Role of witness & Description of                   Proved\n       Name of                      documents                             documents/\n       Witness                                                               case\n                                                                          properties\n     PW-1/ Sh.        He was the complainant in the present Ex.PW1/A\n     Mohd. Hanif      case. PW1 gave written complaint in PS (complaint of\n                      and identified his signature at point A on PW1)\n                      the same. On the point of identification\n                      of accused, he did not support the case\n                      of prosecution.PW-2/Sh.         He narrated the incident dated 24.02.2020, wherein\n     Wasim            his factory of ladies garments at E-251, Gali No.4,\n                      Khajuri Khas, Delhi, was set on fire by the mob.\n     PW-3/Sh.         He was also resident of E block, and he made a\n     Amit             telephone call at 100 number from his mobile no.9858585833 on 24.02.2020, regarding pelting of\n                      stones upon the houses by a huge mob.PW-4/Ct.         He produced original order under                Ex.PW4/A\n     NeerajSection 144Cr.P.C., which was issued           (copy of\n     Kumar            by the then DCP, North­East District,           order under\n                      Delhi, on 24.02.2020.Section 144Cr.P.C. dated\n                                                                      24.02.2020)\n     PW-5/ SI         He was investigating officer in case FIR No.221/20,\n     Sandeep          PS Khajuri Khas, who arrested accused Noor\n                      Mohammad @ Noora on 31.03.2020.Page 5 of 13                                                  (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                                Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                         CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                       State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n               SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                           Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n  Sl. No. &        Role of witness & Description of                   Proved\n  Name of                     documents                             documents/\n  Witness                                                              case\n                                                                    properties\nPW-6/ Smt.      She was resident of gali no. 12, and she also made a\nMamta           telephone call at 100 number regarding riot dated\nPathak          24.02.2020, taking place in the rear side of her house.\nPW-7/ Sh.       He was resident of Munga Nagar, and he also made a\nSunil Singh     telephone call at 100 number, being terrified of\n                incident of riot dated 24.02.2020, taking place in the\n                gali in front of his house.PW-8/ Retd.     On 02.03.2020, he was posted as                 Ex.PW8/A\nSI Chander      Duty Officer from 8 AM till 4 PM.               (endorsement\nPal             On that day, at about 01:54 PM, PW8             on rukka);received rukka from ASI Jamshed Ali             Ex.PW8/B\n                and registered FIR in the present               (cop of FIR)\n                case. PW8 handed over original                  &\n                rukka and copy of FIR to Ct.\n                Rohtash.                                        Ex.PW8/C\n                                                                (certificatePW8 identified his endorsement from u/s 65-B of\n                points X to X, bearing his signatureI.E. Act)\n                point Y. PW8 also identified his\n                signature at point A on his certificate\n                underSection 65-Bof I.E. Act, in\n                support of aforesaid FIR.PW-9/ ASI       On 02.03.2020, he was posted as ASI in PS Khajuri\nJamshed Ali     Khas. On that day, at about 10 AM, SHO Insp. Pawan\n                Kumar handed over him one complaint of PW-\n                1/Mohd. Hanif for getting FIR registered. On receipt\n                of that complaint, PW9 prepared rukka and handed\n                over the same to Duty Officer (PW8), for registration\n                of FIR. After registration of FIR, PW8 handed over\n                copy of FIR and original rukka to PW9, for\n                investigation.PW9 identified his rukka from points B to B1 and his\n                signature appearing in circle B2, on Ex.PW1/A.\n                Thereafter, investigation of the present case was\n                transferred to SIT Crime Branch and PW9 deposited\n                the complete case file with record Moharrar of his PSPage 6 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                          Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                         CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                       State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n               SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                           Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n  Sl. No. &        Role of witness & Description of                   Proved\n  Name of                     documents                             documents/\n  Witness                                                              case\n                                                                    properties\n                on 10.03.2020.PW-10/ Ct.      On 02.04.2020, he was posted at PS Ex.PW10/A\nSangram         Khajuri Khas. On that day, at about (arrest memo\nSingh           10-11 AM, SI Sandeep and ASI of accused)\n                Jeevanand were interrogating one boy\n                in front of Lock-up. PW10 identified\n                that boy as one of the boys, who was\n                involved in the riots on 24.02.2020.\n                PW10 had seen that boy while\n                throwing articles out of the shop and\n                destroying the same on 24.02.2020 in\n                gali no.4, E-Block, Khajuri Khas.PW10 told this fact to SI Sandeep and\n                ASI Jeevanand. He came to know\n                name of this boy as Noor Mohammad\n                @ Noora.PW10 was witness to arrest of\n                accused. He identified his signature at\n                circle X on the same.On 24.02.2020, PW10 was on duty\n                from about 9-10 AM, in gali no.4, E-Block, Khajuri Khas in front of\n                Lakhpat School. HC Vikram and HC\n                Virender were also present there and\n                all of them were dispersing the mob,\n                which indulged in destroying and\n                putting on fire the articles of the\n                shops, in gali no.4 of aforesaid place.\n                PW10 had seen accused while\n                entering the shops and coming out\n                with the articles and throwing the\n                same in the gali, as he had not\n                covered his face at that time.PW-11/ASI       On 11.03.2020, he was posted at PS Ex.PW11/A\nJeevanand       Khajuri Khas. On that day, on the (site plan\n                directions of SHO, case file was prepared byPage 7 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                          Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                         CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                       State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n               SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                           Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n  Sl. No. &        Role of witness & Description of                   Proved\n  Name of                     documents                             documents/\n  Witness                                                              case\n                                                                    properties\n                handed over to him for further PW11)\n                investigation.PW11 met complainant (PW1),\n                prepared site plan of place of incident\n                at his instance and recorded his\n                statement underSection 161Cr.P.C.\n                On 02.04.2020, PW11 interrogated\n                accused for the purpose of this case.\n                At that time, PW1/Sh. Hanif had also\n                come to PS to enquire about status of\n                his case and pointed out towards\n                accused as the responsible person for\n                vandalism in his shop. PW10/Ct.Sangram also came there and he also\n                identified accused, being involved in\n                the incident of vandalism in the shop\n                of PW1/Sh. Hanif, in the name and\n                style of M/s. Prince Tailor. Thereafter,\n                PW11 arrested accused Noora in the\n                present case.PW11 identified his signature in\n                circle X on site plan prepared by him.\n                After completion of investigation,\n                PW11 prepared chargesheet and filed\n                before court.PW-12/ Ct.      In February 2020, he was posted at PS Khajuri Khas,\nDevender        as reader to SHO.On 24.02.2020, he received copy of order underSection 144Cr.P.C., issued by DCP, through\n                Dak/rider.On the direction of SHO, PW12 announced\n                proclamation underSection 144Cr.P.C. in the area of\n                PS Khajuri Khas, through loud speaker.Page 8 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                          Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                              CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                            State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                    SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n     PLEA OF ACCUSED UNDER SECTION 313 CR.P.C.7.   Accused Noor Mohammad @ Noora denied all the allegations\n     and pleaded innocence, taking plea that he was falsely arrested in\n     this case and he never indulged in riots. He further took plea that\n     he was falsely implicated in the present case by the investigating\n     agency. He opted not to lead any evidence in his defence.\n     Thereafter, DE was closed and matter was fixed for final\n     arguments.8.   I heard ld. Special PP and ld. defence counsel for accused and I\n     have perused the entire material on the record.\n     ARGUMENTS OF DEFENCE & PROSECUTION9.   Sh. Akhtar Shamim, ld. defence counsel for accused Noor\n     Mohammad @ Noora argued that prosecution cited three\n     witnesses for identification of accused, but accused wsa not\n     identified by PW1/Sh. Mohd. Hanif and PW2/Sh. Wasim, in the\n     present case. He further argued that testimony of PW10/Ct.\n     Sangram and PW11/ASI Jeevanad, should be read together. Ld.\n     counsel further argued that it is not the case of prosecution that\n     some members of the mob had covered their faces and some\n     were without any cover to face. He further argued that\n     identification of accused was done for the first time on\n     02.04.2020 and prior to that there is no statement stating that, if\n     anyone could identify accused in the present case. Ld. defence\n     counsel further argued that IO started investigation since\n     11.03.2020 and no evidence was obtained against accused till\n     02.04.2020. Only when on 02.04.2020, accused was arrested, he\n     was implicated in nine cases, which had not been worked out, byPage 9 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                               Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                              CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                            State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                    SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n    manipulating statement of witnesses. He further argued that\n    PW10/Ct. Sangram did not make any video of incident, though\n    he had smart phone. He further argued that since PW10/Ct.\n    Sangram was more concerned about his safety etc., therefore, he\n    could not have identified a single person out of that mob. He\n    further argued that IO/PW11 did not record statement of\n    PW1/Sh. Mohd. Hanif, prior to 02.04.2020.10. Per contra, Sh. Naresh Kumar Gaur, ld. Special PP for the State\n    argued that PW10/Ct. Sangram identified accused as member of\n    the mob. He further argued that PW12/Ct. Devender had\n    announced proclamation order underSection 144Cr.P.C. dated\n    24.02.2020 in the area of PS Khajuri Khas. He further argued that\n    in the given atmosphere, police could not have made any video in\n    such tensed condition. He further argued that everyone knew of\n    proclamation of order underSection 144Cr.P.C. in the area of PS\n    Khajuri Khas. Ld. Special PP further argued that PW10/Ct.\n    Sangram informed SHO about having identified some rioters on\n    24.02.2020, itself.APPRECIATION OF FACTS AND EVIDENCE\n    UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY & RIOTS11. Testimonies of PW1, PW2, PW3 and PW10 mention about the\n    mob, which was indulging into vandalism and arson in that area\n    covering gali no. 4, E-block, Khajuri Khas, Delhi on 24.02.2020.\n    This fact has not been challenged by the defence. PW1 and PW2\n    also testified about damage to their shop and factory respectively.\n    Their evidence read along with testimony of PW10, show that\n    such damage was caused by the riotous mob. Though PW1 alsoPage 10 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                               Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                              CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                            State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                    SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n    proved some photographs of his shop, but he did not prove\n    certificate underSection 65-B, Indian Evidence Act, in support of\n    such photographs. This omission on the part of prosecution, to\n    obtain requisite certificate from the concerned photographer and\n    prove the photographs accordingly, leaves no option for this court\n    but to ignore the photographs. Nonetheless, the testimonies of\n    above-mentioned witnesses, in absence of any dispute, are\n    sufficient to prove that there was an unlawful assembly, which\n    committed riot in that area.IDENTIFICATION OF ACCUSED12. The foremost question is that whether accused Noor Mohammad\n    @ Noora was also involved in the aforesaid incident, as a\n    member of above-mentioned unlawful assembly? To establish\n    identity of accused as member of above-mentioned mob,\n    prosecution relied upon testimony of PW1 and PW-10/Ct.\n    Sangram. PW1 turned hostile in respect of identifying any rioter\n    in that mob. He was cross examined by ld. prosecutor, but to no\n    avail. According to PW10, he saw accused in that mob, which\n    indulged in destroying and putting on fire the articles of shops in\n    gali no.4, E-Block, Khajuri Khas, including the shop of PW1.13. It is matter of record that in his complaint dated 29.02.2020,\n    PW1/Sh. Mohd. Hanif did not name accused as one of the rioters\n    nor did he say that he had seen and could identify any of the\n    rioters. As per testimony of IO/PW11, PW10 told him about\n    involvement of accused in the riot for the first time on\n    02.04.2020. Though, the investigation of this case was entrusted\n    to PW11on 11.03.2020 and he also knew that PW10 was beatPage 11 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                               Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                          CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                        State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                            Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\nconstable of the concerned area, but IO did not examine PW10\nprior to 02.04.2020. In his cross-examination at one point of\ntime, IO deposed that in this case prior to 02.04.2020, no one had\ntold him except Hanif that he could identify accused involved in\nthis case. At the same time, IO again said that he had made\ninquiries from PW10 before 02.04.2020 also and PW10 had told\nhim that he could identify the person responsible for vandalism\nin the shop of Hanif. Still, IO/PW11 did not record statement of\nPW10, nor did he mention this fact in the case diary. Thus, I find\nthat IO contradicted his own statement regarding getting\ninformation prior to 02.04.2020 of the relevant witness i.e.\nPW10, who could identify the culprits. Surprisingly, he did not\nrecord such information either in the form of statement underSection 161Cr.P.C. or in the case diary, if he had at all received\nsuch information from PW10 or for that matter from PW1. This\nshows that identification of accused on 02.04.2020, was probably\noutcome of an after thought development. When PW1 was\nallegedly examined by IO, he had not only stated about\nvandalism in his shop, but at the same time he also stated about\nassault on him by that mob. However, PW1 altogether denied\nsuch facts in his testimony before the court and turned hostile to\nthe case of prosecution. The proceedings of 02.04.2020 regarding\ninterrogation of accused in other case and coincidental visit of\nPW1 as well as PW10 to that place in PS at the same time,\nresulting into identification of accused as one of the culprits in\nthe incident in question, does appear unnatural. Therefore, I do\nnot find it safe to rely upon such coincidental identification byPage 12 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                           Karkardooma Courts, Delhi\n                              CNR No. DLNE01-000970-2021\n                            State v. Noor Mohammad @ Noora\n                    SC No. 127/2021, FIR No. 153/2020, PS Khajuri Khas\n                                Judgment dated 19.09.2022\n\n    PW10, so as to presume involvement of accused in the incident\n    in question. Hence, I find that testimony of PW10 is not reliable\n    and sufficient at all, to establish presence of accused in the mob,\n    which indulged into riot and incident investigated in this case.\n    CONCLUSION & DECISION14. In view of my foregoing discussions, observations and findings, I\n    find that charges levelled against the accused in this case are not\n    proved beyond reasonable doubts. Hence, accused Noor\n    Mohammad @ Noora is acquitted of all the charges levelled\n    against him in this case.                    Digitally signed\n                                                 by PULASTYA\n                                      PULASTYA   PRAMACHALA\n                                      PRAMACHALA Date:2022.09.19\n                                                 18:06:01 +0530\n    Announced in the open court (PULASTYA PRAMACHALA)\n    today on 19.09.2022             ASJ-03 (North- East)\n    (This order contains 13 pages) Karkardooma Courts/DelhiPage 13 of 13                                                 (Pulastya Pramachala)ASJ-03, North-East District,\n                                                               Karkardooma Courts, Delhi