Jharkhand High CourtVishal Nath Sahdeo vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ... on 15 October, 2020Author:Anil Kumar ChoudharyBench:Anil Kumar ChoudharyIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n               A.B.A. No. 5104 of 2020\n                           ------Vishal Nath Sahdeo                       ...             Petitioner\n                                      Versus\n       The State of Jharkhand               ...               Opposite Party\n                                       ------CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY------For the Petitioner        : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate\n       For the State             : Mr. P. Chatterjee, Addl. P.P.------Order No.02 Dated- 15.10.2020\n\n            Heard the parties through video conferencing.\n            Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to\n      remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two\n      weeks after the lockdown period is over.In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for\n      the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are\n      ignored for the present.Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this\n       Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with\n       Kuru P.S. Case No.86 of 2020 registered undersections 379of the\n       Indian Penal Code, Rules 4/30/32/54 (1) OF Jharkhand Minor\n       Mineral Concession Rule, 2004 (Amended 2017).The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the\n       allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner\n       of brick kiln and was loading kiln without depositing royalty. It is\n       further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all\n       false and drawing attention of this Court to page nos.18-22 of the\n       brief, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that\n       the petitioner has deposited the royalty amount. It is then\n       submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish\n       sufficient security including cash security and undertakes to\n       cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted\n       that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of\n       anticipatory bail.Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as\n discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the\n above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.\n Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of\n eight weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail\n on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- and on furnishing bail\n bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two\n sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned\n A.C.J.M., Lohardaga, in connection with Kuru P.S. Case No.86 of\n 2020 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the\n investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating\n Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile\n number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the\n undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the\n pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down undersection 438 (2)Cr. P.C.\n\n\n\n\n                            (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)\nSonu/Gunjan-