Central Information CommissionSatya Vijay Singh vs Railway Board on 27 September, 2017क य सूचना आयोग
                      CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                            लब बि डंग (पो ट ऑ फस केपास)
                           Club Building (Near Post Office)
                         ओ ड जेन यू कपस, नई !द ल -110067
                         Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067
                           Tel: +91-11-26182593/26182594
                           Email:[email protected]File No.: CIC/RAILB/A/2016/304375-AB

In the matter of:

Satya Vijay Singh,



                                                                    ...Appellant
                                       VS
DPG & CPIO,
RTI Cell Room No-507,
5th floor, Railway Board,
New Delhi-110001                                                  ...Respondent
                                               Dates
RTI application                        :       05.05.2016
CPIO reply                             :       20.06.2016
First Appeal                           :       10.07.2016
FAA Order                              :       21.07.2016
Second Appeal                          :       25.08.2016
Date of hearing                        :       20.09.2017


Facts:The appellant vide RTI application dated 05.05.2016 sought information on 4
points; rules relating to the accommodation of retired employees while
travelling to out stations, rules relating to TA bill for the same, rules according
to which they can avail the facility of railway rest houses after retirement etc.
The CPIO replied on 20.06.2016. The appellant being aggrieved filed first
appeal on 10.07.2016. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) disposed of the first
appeal on 21.07.2016. The appellant being aggrieved filed second appeal before
this Commission on 25.08.2016.1Grounds for Second Appeal
The CPIO did not provide the desired information.Order


         Appellant         :      Present

         Respondent        :      CPIO,       Ms.   Priya    Sudarshini,     Joint
Director(F)During the hearing the respondent CPIO submitted that they had provided
the requisite information vide their letters dated 13.06.2016(on point no. 3),
20.06.2016 (along with annexures) and 14.09.2017 which are just and proper
and the case should be dismissed. The appellant submitted that most of the
replies were not provided to him by the respondent.The respondent was directed to resend the replies to the appellant within
03 days of the receipt of the order under intimation to the Commission.On perusal of the case record, it was seen that proper reply was not
provided.     A more comprehensive reply should have been provided to the
appellant.Be that as it may, since no proper information was provided to the
appellant till date, the respondent CPIO is directed to provide point wise reply
complete in all respects to the appellant as available on record in the form of
certified true copies of the documents e.g. note sheet, letters, correspondence, e-
mail free of chargeu/s 7(6)of the RTI Act within 15 days of the receipt of the
order.2The respondent CPIO is further directed to send a report containing the
copy of the revised reply and the date of despatch of the same to the RTI
appellant within 07 days thereafter to the Commission for record.With the above direction, the appeal is disposed of.Copies of the order be sent to both the parties free of cost.[Amitava Bhattacharyya]
                                                    Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy


(A.K.Talapatra)
Dy. Registrar3