Patna High Court - OrdersLal Bahadur Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 5 January, 2015Author:Prabhat Kumar JhaBench:Prabhat Kumar JhaIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Criminal Miscellaneous No.51935 of 2014
                       Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2012 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL
                 ======================================================
                 Lal Bahadur Yadav, son of Ravindra Yadav, resident of Village-Tulapatti,
                 P.S.-Kishanpur, District-Supaul.
                                                                        .... .... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                .... .... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :      Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Shahin Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA
                 ORAL ORDER

2   05-01-2015Heard both sides.The petitioner, Lal Bahadur Yadav, apprehends his

                 arrest in Kishanpur P.S. Case No.58 of 2012, registered underSections 419,420,467,468,471and34of the Indian Penal

                 Code.The informant alleged that Anil Kumar and Lal

                 Bahadur Yadav, the petitioner, being agent of Central Bank,

                 Bahuarwa Branch, misappropriated his amount of K.C.C. in

                 collusion with Binod Kumar Singh @ Binod Kumar, the

                 Manager of the Bank.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                 petitioner is an agent and he has not withdrawn the amount from

                 the account of the informant. The informant filed a petition in the

                 Court below that he named the petitioner on the saying of others.Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51935 of 2014 (2) dt.05-01-20152/2Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, however,

                       opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.Perused the record.It appears that the informant made allegation that the

                       petitioner withdrew the amount from his K.C.C. account, but it

                       appears that Binod Kumar Singh @ Binod Kumar, the Manager

                       of the Bank, has already been granted anticipatory bail by this

                       Court vide order passed in Cr. Misc. No.29839 of 2013.Having considered the aforesaid facts, the petitioner,

                       above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

                       Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of

                       receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be

                       enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of

                       Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                       each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

                       Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No.58 of 2012,

                       subject to the conditions laid down underSection 438(2)of the

                       Code of Criminal Procedure.(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
Pawan/-U           T