Himachal Pradesh High CourtCwp No. 5385/2014 vs State Of H.P. And Others on 16 September, 2015Bench:Mansoor Ahmad Mir,Tarlok Singh ChauhanIN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
                                    CWP No. 5385 of 2014
                             alongwith connected matters.
                   Date of decision: 16th September, 2015.

        1.      CWP No. 5385/2014.




                                                         .
        Shakti Ram                               .....Petitioner





                         Versus
        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents
        2.      CWP No. 5284/2014.





        Tilak Raj                        .....Petitioner
                         Versus
        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents
        3.      CWP No. 5442/2014.




                                     of
        Kamlesh Kumari                           .....Petitioner
                         Versus
        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents
        4.      CWP No. 5466/2014.
                  rt
        Sanju                                    .....Petitioner
                         Versus
        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents

        5.      CWP No. 5467/2014.
        Meena Kumari                             .....Petitioner
                         Versus
        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents



        6.      CWP No. 5468/2014.
        Reena Kumari                             .....Petitioner
                         Versus




        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents
        7.      CWP No. 5470/2014.





        Kamal Kant Vatsi                         .....Petitioner
                         Versus
        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents





        8.      CWP No.5502/2014.
        Vividh Walia                             .....Petitioner
                         Versus
        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents
        9.      CWP No. 5503/2014.
        Kumar Singh                              .....Petitioner
                         Versus
        State of H.P. and others         ....Respondents
        10.     CWP No. 5506/2014.
        Chaman Lal                               .....Petitioner




                                      ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:56:43 :::HCHP
                         -2-


                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     11.   CWP No. 5507/2014.
     Bhama Devi                            .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents




                                                   .
     12.   CWP No. 5518/2014.





     Ram Gopal                     .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents





     13.   CWP No. 5529/2014.
     Ramesh Kumar                          .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents




                                of
     14.   CWP No. 5530/2014.
     Dinesh Kumar                          .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others
             rt                    ....Respondents
     15.   CWP No. 5531/2014.
     Seema Devi                            .....Petitioner

                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     16.   CWP No. 5532/2014.
     Balbir Singh                          .....Petitioner
                      Versus



     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     17.   CWP No. 5548/2014.
     Kusum Lata                            .....Petitioner




                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents





     18.   CWP No. 5569/2014.
     Gopal Krishan                         .....Petitioner
                      Versus





     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     19.   CWP No. 5571/2014.
     Chaman Lal                            .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     20.   CWP No. 5574/2014.
     Naresh Kumar                          .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents




                                ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:56:43 :::HCHP
                         -3-


     21.   CWP No. 5578/2014.
     Nitu Devi                     .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     22.   CWP No. 5585/2014.
     Sant Ram                      .....Petitioner




                                                   .
                      Versus





     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     23.   CWP No. 5619/2014.
     Aruna Kumari                          .....Petitioner





                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     24.   CWP No. 5623/2014.
     Kamlesh                       .....Petitioner




                                of
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     25.   CWP No. 5665/2014.
     Anjna Kumari
             rt                            .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents

     26.   CWP No. 5666/2014.
     Rajeev Kumar                          .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     27.   CWP No. 5667/2014.



     Geeta Chand                           .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents




     28.   CWP No. 5684/2014.
     Sunil Kumar                           .....Petitioner





                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     29.   CWP No. 5731/2014.





     Jai Prakash                           .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     30.   CWP No. 5743/2014.
     Kaku Ram                      .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others      ....Respondents
     31.   CWP No. 5832/2014.
     Mamta Thakur                          .....Petitioner
                      Versus




                                ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:56:43 :::HCHP
                           -4-


     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     32.     CWP No. 6028/2014.
     Bindu                           .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     33.     CWP No. 6035/2014.




                                                     .
     Deep Prakash                            .....Petitioner





                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     34.     CWP No. 6041/2014.





     Nirmala Devi                            .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     35.     CWP No. 6236/2014.




                                  of
     Suman                                   .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     36.     CWP No. 6362/2014.
               rt
     Bhagat Ram                              .....Petitioner
                      Versus

     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     37.     CWP No. 6378/2014.
     Veena Devi                              .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents



     38.     CWP No. 7638/2014.
     Rajinder Singh and others               .....Petitioners
                      Versus




     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     39.     CWP No. 7849/2014.





     Shashi Kala                             .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents





     40.     CWP No. 8137/2014.
     Vanita Devi                     .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     41.     CWP No. 8138/2014.
     Pratibha Devi                           .....Petitioner
                      Versus
     State of H.P. and others        ....Respondents
     42.     CWP No. 8969/2014.




                                  ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:56:43 :::HCHP
                                                  -5-


                   Meena Rani                                                     .....Petitioner
                                    Versus
                   State of H.P. and others                           ....Respondents
                   43.      CWP No. 9524/2014.
                   Ravinder Kumar                                                 .....Petitioner
                                    Versus




                                                                                        .
                   State of H.P. and others                           ....Respondents





                   44.      CWP No. 1472/2015.
                   Kavita Thakur                                                  .....Petitioner
                                    Versus





                   State of H.P. and others                           ....Respondents
           Coram:
           The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice
           The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.




                                                           of
           Whether approved for reporting ?1

           For the petitioner(s):
                               rt                    M/s Sanjay Gandhi, Suneet Goel,
                                                     P.P. Chauhan, Rohit Chauhan,
                                                     Raman Kumar, Naresh Verma,
                                                     Avneesh Bhardwaj, Vikrant Chandel,

                                                     Digvijay Singh, Kamlesh Saklani,
                                                     Parveen Kumar Chandel, Ashwani
                                                     Kaundal, Advocates.
           For the respondent(s):                    Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate
                                                     General, with Mr. Anup Rattan and


                                                     Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional
                                                     Advocate Generals with Mr. J.K.
                                                     Verma, Deputy Advocate General for
                                                     respondents-State.




                                                     M/s Archana Dutt, Raj Kumar, Negi,
                                                     and Aruna Sharma, Advocates, for
                                                     the respondent-Board.





                                                     Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for
                                                     respondent-NCTE.





           Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2.               It appears that the petitioners are not

                   having the qualification of B.Ed., which is pre-requisite1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:56:43 :::HCHP-6-for appearing in the examination, as per the Rules

     occupying the field, read with the terms and conditions

     contained in the Advertisement Notice..3.         The apex Court inState of Gujarat and





     others versus Arvindkumar T. Tiwari and anotherreported in (2012) 9 SCC 545 and latest judgment in

     case titled State of Gujarat and anther versus




                               of
     Chitraben reported in 2015 AIR SCW 4305 has held

     that no relaxation can be granted unless rules
             rt
     specifically provides for. At this stage, the learned

     counsel for the petitioners stated at the Bar that the

     petitioners have already filed the representations

     before the respondents in terms of the interim



     directions made by this Court and they may be




     permitted to pursue the representations so filed before





     the respondents and the respondents may be directed

     to examine the same on the analogy of Notification





     dated 12th August, 2014, issued by the Ministry of

     Human Resource Development, Department of School

     Education and Literacy. Their statements are taken on

     record.::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:56:43 :::HCHP-7-4.           In the given circumstances, we deem it

         proper to dispose of all these writ petitions by providing

         that the petitioners are at liberty to pursue the




                                                                   .representations       if     already   filed     or     file    fresh





         representations before the respondents and direct the





         respondents to make decision within six weeks from

         today, as per the Rules, occupying the field. Ordered




                                          of
         accordingly.5.           At this stage, Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate
                  rt
         stated that the result of the petitioners is available in

         sealed cover, as per the directions of this Court. She is

         directed to hand over the same to the authority

         concerned.6.           The writ petitions are disposed of, as




         indicated hereinabove, alongwith pending applications,





         if any. Copy dasti.(Mansoor Ahmad Mir)
                                                     Chief Justice.September 16, 2015.                         (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
      (cm Thakur)                                      Judge.::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:56:43 :::HCHP