Jharkhand High CourtDwarika Chauhan Alias Dwarika Noniya vs The State Of Jharkhand on 11 August, 2017Author:Anil Kumar ChoudharyBench:Anil Kumar ChoudharyIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                 A.B.A. No. 4812 of 2017

             Dwarika Chauhan @ Dwarika Noniya                    ...      Petitioner
                                   Versus
            The State of Jharkhand                               ...     Opp. Party

Coram:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

            1. For the Petitioner                 : Mr. Vipul Poddar, Adv.
            2. For the State                      : Addl. P.P.


02 /11.08.2017Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
            this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
            with Complaint Case No. 1309 of 2014 registered undersections
            147/323/498A/379/354Bof the Indian Penal Code andsection
            3/4of Dowry Prohibition Act (cognizance has been taken undersection 498A/34of the Indian Penal Code).Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
            learned Addl. P.P. for the State.The     learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   seeks
            permission of this Court to implead the complainant as opposite
            party no.2 of this anticipatory bail application.The petitioner is directed to incorporate the name of
            the complainant as opposite party no.2 of this anticipatory bail
            application, during course of the day.Let notice be issued to the newly impleaded opposite
            party no.2 under registered post with A/D as well as underordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within a
            week by the petitioner, failing which, this application shall stand
            dismissed without further reference to the Bench.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
            the petitioner is the husband of the informant. He further submits
            that the petitioner is quite innocent and the allegation has falsely
            been foisted against the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner be given
            the privilege of anticipatory bail.The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for
            anticipatory bail.List this case on 15.09.2017.The petitioner is directed to remain physically
        present before this Court on 15.09.2017.Considering the submissions of the counsels and the
        fact as discussed above, I am inclined to pass an interim order of
        anticipatory bail provisionally till 15.09.2017. In case of the
        petitioner being arrested by the police on or before 15.09.2017, he
        shall be released on bail provisionally on furnishing bail bond of
        Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like
        amount each to the satisfaction of the officer concerned in
        connection with Complaint Case No. 1309 of 2014, subject to the
        conditions laid down underSection 438(2)of the Code of Criminal
        Procedure.(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-