Patna High Court - OrdersRamchandra Sahni & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 11 June, 2012Author:Jyoti SaranBench:Jyoti SaranIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Criminal Miscellaneous No.18831 of 2012
                 ======================================================
                 1. Ramchandra Sahni, S/o Mangal Sahni.
                 2. Chhedilal Sahni @ Chhedi Sahani, S/o Ramchandra Sahni.
                 3. Jalandhar Sahni, S/o Ram Chandra Sahni.
                 4. Mukesh Sahni @ Mukesh Kumar, S/o Ramchandra Sahni.
                 5. Kushi Kumari, D/o Ramchandra Sahni.
                 6. Dharmendra Sahni, S/o Ramchandra Sahni.
                 7. Sheojyoti Devi, W/o Ramchandra Sahni.
                 8. Laxmi Devi, W/o Chhedi Sahni.
                 9. Chhoti Sahni, S/o Ramchandra Sahni.
                       All are resident of village-Bazar Pipra, P.S.-Pipra, District-East
                    Champaran at Motihari.
                                                                      .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :   Dr. Amrendra Kumar No.1, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN
                 ORAL ORDER

2   11-06-2012Heard Dr. Amrendra Kumar No.1, learned counsel

                   appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.319 of 2011 for the

                   offences punishable undersections 147,148,149,342,323,325and302of the Indian Penal Code.Considering the nature of allegation as set out in the

                   FIR against the petitioners, I am not satisfied with the

                   contention advanced on behalf of the petitioners. Consequently

                   the prayer for anticipatory bail is refused. The petitioners, if soPatna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18831 of 2012 (2) dt.11-06-2012                       2advise, may surrender and pray for regular bail before the court

                        below and which shall be considered and disposed of on its

                        own merit without being prejudiced by the order passed in this

                        case.(Jyoti Saran, J)
SKPathak/-