Himachal Pradesh High CourtManjeet Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 15 May, 2020Bench:Tarlok Singh Chauhan,Anoop ChitkaraIN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,\n                SHIMLA\n\n\n\n\n                                                                               .\n\n                                    CWP No.1444 of 2020\n\n                                    Date of decision : 15.5.2020\n\n\n\n\n\n   Manjeet Kumar\n                                                                    ... Petitioner.\n                                    Versus\n\n\n\n\n\n   State of Himachal Pradesh and others\n                                                                    ...Respondents\n   Coram:\n   The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.\n\n   The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.\n\n    Whether approved for reporting?1 No.\n\n   For the Petitioner           :   Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate.\n\n\n   For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with\n                         Mr. Ranjan Sharma and Mr. Vinod Thakur,\n                         Additional Advocate Generals, for the\n                         Respondents/State.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n         COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE\n\n   Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge                     (Oral)The instant petition has been filed for the following\n\n   relief(s):-"i.    That the Quarantine order dated 27.04.2020\n                            issued by Kangra Administration: Annexure1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2020 20:23:14 :::HCHP...2...P-1 restraining any movement of Petitioner,\n                 wife of the petitioner and daughter of the\n\n\n\n\n                                                          .petitioner may very kindly be quashed and\n                 set aside."2.           On instructions, Mr. Ranjan Sharma, learned\n\nAdditional Advocate General, submits that even though the\n\n\n\n\n\npetitioner has been placed under Home Quarantine, but he\n\nhas never been disassociated or obstructed from carrying out\n\nthe harvesting activities. In fact, it is the petitioner himself\n\nwho has violated the Quarantine Order by visiting the bazar.3.         As regards, the medical exigency of the wife of the\n\n\n\npetitioner, it is submitted that as and when she requires\n\nmedical checkup, Curfew Pass on priority basis, shall be\n\n\n\n\nissued in her favour.4.         In view of the instructions imparted by learned\n\nAdditional Advocate General, the present petition is rendered\n\n\n\n\n\ninfructuous and is disposed of as such. It is, however, made\n\nclear that the petitioner shall be permitted to carryout the\n\nharvesting activities, but the petitioner shall not in any way,::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2020 20:23:14 :::HCHP...3...violate the Quarantine Order, placing him under Home\n\n\n\n\n                                                          .Quarantine.5.         The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms,\n\nleaving the parties to bear their own costs.Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed\n\nof.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan),\n                    r                   Judge\n\n                                   (Anoop Chitkara),\n                                        Judge\n15th May, 2020   (GR/KS)::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2020 20:23:14 :::HCHP