Central Administrative Tribunal - DelhiRam Pal vs Delhi Transport Corporation, Govt. Of ... on 22 September, 2017Central Administrative Tribunal
                           Principal Bench

                           OA No. 3360/2017

            New Delhi, this the 22nd day of September, 2017


               Hon'ble Mr.V.Ajay Kumar, Member (J)
              Hon'ble Ms. Nita Chowdhury, Member (A)

Ram Pal, Aged 32 years,
S/o Shri Chandra Bhan,
B.N. CC 142, T.No.76149,
R/o 89, A-2, Dharmapura Extn,
Najafgarh,
New Delhi-110043.
Contractual Conductor (Group 'C')
                                                         ...Applicant
(By Advocate : Shri Shivam Bajaj)

                                Versus

     1. Delhi Transport Corporation,
        Through its Chairman & C.M.D.,
        I.P. Depot, I.P. Estate,
        New Delhi-110002.

     2. Depot Manager,
        Delhi Transport Corporation,
        Sector-2, Depot, Dwarka,
        New Delhi-110075.
                                                      ...Respondents

                            ORDER (ORAL)Mr. V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J) :-Heard the learned counsel for applicant.2.      The applicant, a contractual conductor filed the OA seeking

the following reliefs :-"a)   Declare the impugned termination order
                  dated 17.01.2017 as illegal, arbitrary,
                  discriminatory  unreasonable,  unjust,2OA No.3360/2017inequitable and quash and set aside the
                same.b)   Direct the Respondents to reinstate the
                Applicant    since    the     impugned
                termination order dated 17.01.2017 is
                illegal,   arbitrary,    discriminatory,
                unreasonable, unjust, inequitable   and
                passed against the principles of natural
                justice.c)    Direct the Respondents to compensate for
                the loss of pay to the Applicant due to the
                arbitrary,   unreasonable and       unjust
                decision and the consequential arrears
                which are due to the applicant from
                17.01.2016 along with interest at the rate
                of 12% per annum; andd)    Pass such other and further orders as this
                Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and
                appropriate    in     the    facts    and
                circumstances of the case."3.   It is submitted that the applicant made an appeal dated

06.02.2017, against the termination order dated 17.01.2017,

however, the same was rejected vide Annexure-A/9 order dated

07.04.2017, without giving any reasons.4.   A bare perusal of the Annexure-A/9 clearly indicates that the

same is a non-speaking order and the respondents simply rejected

the appeal of the applicant without assigning a single reason. The

same is liable to be set aside on the said ground alone.5.   In the circumstances, the OA is disposed of without going into

other merits of the case, with a direction to the respondents to re-

consider the appeal of the applicant and to pass appropriate3OA No.3360/2017speaking and reasoned order, within a period of 60 days from the

date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with

law. No costs.5.     Let a copy of the OA be enclosed to this order.( Nita Chowdhury )                        ( V. Ajay Kumar )
            Member (A)                              Member (J)

'rk'