Patna High Court - OrdersSantosh Ram & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 25 November, 2014Author:Akhilesh ChandraBench:Akhilesh ChandraIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Criminal Miscellaneous No.28409 of 2014
                       Arising Out of PS.Case No. -318 Year- 2013 Thana -NAUBATPUR District- PATNA
                 ======================================================
                 1. Santosh Ram
                 2. Mantosh Ram
                    Both Sons of Teja Ram
                                                                   .... .... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                              .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Rajesh Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar (A.P.P.)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA
                 ORAL ORDER

2   25-11-2014Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.Both the petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection

                 with a case registered for the offence punishable underSections 147,148,149,323,324,325,307,379and506of the Indian Penal Code, are named

                 accused in this case of assault in a petty dispute.Submission is of false implication under some confusion and

                 everything (disputes) has settled between the parties for which due

                 application is on the record of the court below. Further, none of the

                 petitioners carry any criminal antecedent.If it is so, in the event of informant along with other

                 injured persons appearing before the court below, on due identification,

                 support the factum of compromise and contents made therein with their

                 free will and consent without any coercion and informant also stood as

                 one of the bailors, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court

                 below within four weeks, let the petitioners abovenamed be enlarged on bailPatna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28409 of 2014 (2) dt.25-11-20142/2on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) each with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist

                      Class, Danapur, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 318 of 2013,

                      subject to condition laid down underSection 438 (2)of the Code of Criminal

                      Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the

                      court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the

                      case, whichever is earlier and in case of failure on two consecutive dates

                      without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be

                      deemed to be cancelled.(Akhilesh Chandra, J)
Praveen-II/-U            T