Jharkhand High CourtKumar Shanu vs The State Of Jharkhand on 14 January, 2016Author:H. C. MishraBench:H.C. MishraIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                 A.B.A. No.3635 of 2015

             Kumar Shanu                                    .....   Petitioner
                                            Versus
             1. The State of Jharkhand
             2. Usha Devi                                           ....      Opposite Parties

             CORAM:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA

             For the Petitioner             :        Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha
             For the State                  :        A. P.P.
             For the O.P. No.2              :        Mr. Suchendra Prasad
                                            -----

   3/14.01.2016Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as
             also learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. Both the parties are also present in the
             Court in person.The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajrappa P.S. Case
             No.67 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No.1931 of 2015, for the alleged offences underSection 498-Aof the Indian Penal Code andSections 3/4of the D.P. Act.There is allegation against the petitioner to have subjected his wife to cruelty and
             torture for demand of dowry.It is submitted by the petitioner, who is present in Court that he is ready to keep his
             wife with full dignity with him. The informant is also present in Court in person and she
             also submits that she is also ready to live with her husband.In view of the submissions of the parties, the petitioner is directed to bring the
             informant to her matrimonial home and if they file a joint affidavit to that effect in the Court
             below, the petitioner Kumar Shanu shall be released on provisional bail for a period of
             three months from the date of his release on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten
             thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of
             Sri Abhimanyu Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh, or his successor, in
             connection with Rajrappa P.S. Case No.67 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No.1931 of
             2015.Both the parties shall appear in the Court below on the date of expiry of the
             provisional bail and the Court below shall either extend the period of provisional bail or
             shall confirm the same keeping in view the conduct of the parties in the meantime. If the
             Court below feels that more time is required to the parties for settling their disputes, the
             provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be extended by the Court below on its
             discretion till it finds that the disputes between the parties are settled, and if the Court
             below finds that the dispute between the parties have been settled, the provisional bail
             granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the Court below finds that the parties
             are not living together, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall not be extended
             any further and process shall be issued compelling the surrender / production of the
             petitioner.With these directions, this application is disposed of.(H. C. Mishra, J)
R.Kumar