Jharkhand High CourtSuraj Modi And Anr vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr on 21 April, 2014Author:Prashant KumarBench:Prashant KumarIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                           A.B.A. No. 569 of 2014
                                      ...
                1. Suraj Modi
                2. Niranj Modi                          ... Petitioners
                                -V e r s u s-
                The State of Jharkhand & Another        ... Opposite Parties
                                      ...
                CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR.
                                      ...
                For the Petitioners : - Mr. Prabhat Kr. Sinha, Advocate
                For the State         : - Mrs. Rashmi Kumari, A.P.P.
                                      ...

03/21.04.2014Anticipatory bail application filed by Suraj Modi and
                Niranj Modi, is moved by Sri Prabhat Kumar Sinha, learned
                counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Smt Rashmi
                Kumari, learned Additional P.P for the State.This is a case underSections 323,504,379&385of
                the I.P.C. From perusal of impugned order, I find that the
                learned court below had observed that offence underSection 379of the I.P.C. is a super-addition, but in spite of
                that observation, has not granted anticipatory bail and
                directed petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail.Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I
                allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioners
                to surrender in the court below on or before 02.05.2014 and
                in the event of their surrender, the learned court below is
                directed to enlarge the petitioners, above named, on bail on
                furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each
                with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction
                of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1 st Class, Hazaribagh, in
                connection with Complaint Case No. 1790              of 2012
                corresponding to T.R. No. 663 of 2013, subject to the
                condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.( Prashant Kumar, J.)
    sunil/