Central Administrative Tribunal - DelhiMukesh Kumar vs Sdmc on 18 May, 20221\n\n                                                O.A. No.1079/2022\nItem No.07\n\n                 Central Administrative Tribunal\n                   Principal Bench, New Delhi\n\n                        O.A. No.1079/2022\n\n                   This the 18th day of May 2022\n\n               Hon'ble Mr. R N Singh, Member (J)\n             Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (A)\n\n\n       Shri Mukesh Kumar (Age 52 years Group-D),\n       S/o Sh. Jai Narayan,\n       R/o V.P.O. Imlota, District Ch. Dadri,\n       Haryana, presently at Delhi\n       Pincode -147203.\n                                              ...Applicant\n\n\n        (By Advocate : Shri Vinay Sabharwal )\n\n                                      Versus\n\n   1. South Delhi Municipal Corporation,\n      Through its Commissioner,\n      Ambedkar Stadium Complex,\n      New Delhi-110002.\n\n   2. The Addl. Commissioner,\n      DEMS, South Delhi Municipal Corporation,\n      Room No.1, Ambedkar Stadium Complex,\n      New Delhi-110002.\n                                         ... Respondents\n\n\n(By Advocate : Ms. Manisha Tyagi)\n                              2\n\n                                              O.A. No.1079/2022\nItem No.07\n\n\n\n                      O R D E R (ORAL)\n\n       Hon'ble Mr. R N Singh, Member (J):In the present OA filed underSection 19of\n\n   the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the\n\n   applicant    has     challenged   the    order     dated\n\n   09.03.2022 (Annexure-A/1), vide which, a few\n\n   Sanitary Guides, Regular Safai Karamcharies\n\n   and Group 'D' (now Category 'C') employees of\n\n   other than DEMS have been assigned the duty\n\n   of Assistant Sanitary Inspectors on look after\n\n   charge basis with immediate effect.            Learned\n\n   counsel for the applicant submits that for\n\n   redressal of his grievances, the applicant has\n\n   preferred a representation dated 14.03.2022\n\n   (Annexure-A/8) and the same is still lying\n\n   pending consideration of the respondents. He\n\n   further submits that the present OA may be\n\n   disposed of, at this very stage, with liberty to3O.A. No.1079/2022Item No.07\n\n\n   the       applicant       to    make        a   supplementary\n\n   representation within two weeks from today and\n\n   with a direction to the respondents to consider\n\n   the aforesaid representation along with the\n\n   supplementary representation, in a time bound\n\n   manner.       To such a request of the learned\n\n   counsel for the applicant, there is opposition\n\n   from the learned counsel for the respondents.2.        In the facts and circumstances, with the\n\n   consent of the learned counsels for the parties\n\n   and without going into the merits of the case,\n\n   the present OA is disposed of, at this very stage,\n\n   with      liberty    to    the       applicant    to      make        a\n\n   supplementary representation within two weeks\n\n   from       today    and        with    a    direction       to    the\n\n   respondents           to       consider         the      aforesaid\n\n   representation dated 14.03.2022 (Annexure-A/8)         along         with         a       supplementary4O.A. No.1079/2022Item No.07representation, if received from the applicant,\n\n   and to dispose of the same by passing a\n\n   reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously\n\n   as possible and preferably within six weeks from\n\n   the date of receipt of a copy of such a\n\n   supplementary representation.3.          The OA is disposed of in the aforesaid\n\n   terms. No costs.( Tarun Shridhar )           ( R.N. Singh )\n           Member (A)                  Member (J)\n\n\n        /rk/