Jharkhand High CourtRahul Bhardwaj vs The State Of Jharkhand on 19 July, 2013Author:Jaya RoyBench:Jaya RoyIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                    B.A. No. 5343 of 2013
                                          ­­­­­­
              Rahul Bhardwaj                     .... .... .... Petitioner
                                    Versus
              The State of Jharkhand             .... .... ....     Opp. Party
                                          ­­­­­­
              CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
                                                  
              For the Petitioner          : Mr. B. M. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate
              For the State               : A.P.P.
                                          ­­­­­­
               
02/19.07.2013Heard   counsel   appearing for the petitioner and counsel 
            appearing for the State.Petitioner   is   an   accused   in   this   case   registered   underSections 419/420/120(B)of the Indian Penal Code.Counsel   appearing   for   the   petitioner   has  submitted  that 
            the allegation against the petitioner is that he has impersonated in the 
            examination conducted by the commission. It is also submitted that he 
            is in custody since 20th May, 2013 i.e. two months.Counsel   appearing   for   the   State   has   opposed   and 
            submitted that the petitioner has committed offence by cheating and 
            impersonation.Considering   the   facts   circumstances   of   the   case   and 
            considering   the   period   of   custody,   the   petitioner,   above   named,   is 
            directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/­ 
            (Rs.   Ten   thousand)   with   two   sureties   of   like   amount   each   to   the 
            satisfaction   of   Sub   Divisional   Judicial   Magistrate,   Ranchi   in 
            connection   with   Doranda   (Argora)   P.S.   Case   No.   557   of   2012 
            corresponding to G.R. No. 6314 of 2012 subject to the condition that 
            one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property 
            within the jurisdiction of district concerned.(Jaya Roy, J.)


Anit