Uttarakhand High CourtUnknown vs Mrs. Nishat Intzar on 3 January, 2014Author:Servesh Kumar GuptaBench:Servesh Kumar GuptaG.A. No. 56 of 2013
                                               With
               Delay Condo. Appln. No. 1245 of 2013

Hon'ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon'ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.Mrs. Nishat Intzar, Brief Holder, for the
applicant/appellant.None for the respondent.Order passed on 17th December, 2013 appears
to be a wrong order, inasmuch as, on 26th Aug.2013,
notices were directed to be issued and, according to
the office report dated 14th November, 2013,
respondent has been served personally.We, accordingly, direct the application for
condonation of delay and the appeal to be listed
after the judgment under appeal is translated into
English and filed in the Registry.(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.)
                   03.01.2014
P. Singh
 Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate, for the revisionist.Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel, for the
State of Uttarakhand/respondent.Since the date of passing of the initial order,
there has been no improvement at all. Accordingly,
though we admit the revision, but refuse to grant the
interim order and direct the revision to be listed in
its turn.After we passed this order, learned Counsel
for the revisionist wanted         to   make     further
submissions. We did not permit him to do so.