Rajasthan High CourtHarun vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 July, 2018Author:Pankaj BhandariBench:Pankaj BhandariHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                      BENCH AT JAIPUR

           S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 7777/2018

Harun S/o Sh.Hakmuddin, By caste Mev, R/O Vishambhara
Thana Shergarh, District Mathura (U.P.)
(At present in Sub Jail Deeg, District Bharatpur)
                                                        ----Petitioner
                               Versus
State Of Rajasthan
                                                     ----RespondentFor Petitioner(s)       :   Mr.Sanjay Khan
For Respondent(s)       :   Mr.Sudesh Saini,PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

                        Judgment / Order

09/07/20181.   Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 of

Cr.P.C.2.   F.I.R. No.39/2016 was registered at Police Station Kaman,

District Bharatpur for offence underSections 399,402,332,353&307I.P.C. andSection 3/25of Arms Act.3.   It is contended by the counsel for the petitioner that similarly

situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court.4.   Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

His contention is that petitioner has criminal antecedents.5.   I have considered the contentions.6.   Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.(2 of 2)          [CRLMB-7777/2018]7.    This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is ordered

                                   that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he

                                   furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand

                                   only) and two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty

                                   Five thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

                                   court with the stipulation to appear before that Court and any

                                   court to which the matter is transferred, on all dates of hearing

                                   and as and when called upon to do so.8.    However, it is made clear that if the petitioner repeats the

                                   offence, State would be free to move application for cancellation

                                   of bail before the trial Court.9.    A copy of this order be sent to concerned S.H.O. for

                                   recording this condition in the Village Crime Record Book so that

                                   in the event of petitioner's repeating offence, S.H.O. can move

                                   the Court for cancellation of bail.(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

                                   teekam/36




Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)