Patna High CourtS.A. Institute Of Technology Itc vs The Union Of India & Ors on 18 August, 2015Author:Ajay Kumar TripathiBench:Ajay Kumar TripathiIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12643 of 2013
  ===========================================================
  1. S.A. Institute Of Technology, Itc, Sikandra, Silao, Nalanda Through The Member
  Of The Managing Committee Of Nalanda Minority Educational And Welfare Trust
  Nemely Abu Obaidah Son Of Md. Muslim Resident Of Mohalla - Mahua Tola, P.O.
  Soh Sarai, District - Nalanda

                                                                 .... .... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
  1. The Union Of India Through The Secretary Ministry Of Labour, Sharam Shakti
  Bhawan Rafi Marg, New Delhi
  2. The Secretary, National Council For Vocational Training ( N.C.V.T. )
  Government Of India, Ministry Of Labour, Shramshakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New
  Delhi
  3. The Director General, Employment And Training, Government Of India, Ministry
  Of Labour, Sharan Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi
  4. The Regional Director ( R.D.A.T. ), M.S.O. Building, First Floor, D.F. Block,
  Sector - 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata - 700064
  5. The Director Training, R.D.A.T.( E.R. ), M.S.O. Building, First Floor, D.F. Block,
  Sector - 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata - 700064
  6. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Labour Resource Department Govt.
  Of Bihar, Patna
  7. The Secretary, State Council For Vocational Training ( S.C.V.T. ), Government
  Of Bihar, Department Of Employment And Training, Ministry Of Labour Resources
  New Secretariat, Patna
  8. The Director, Employment And Training, Government Of Bihar, Ministry Of
  Labour Resources, Department Of Employment And Training, New Secretariat,
  Patna
  9. The Controller Of Examination, Department Of Employment And Training,
  Government Of Bihar, I.T.I. Digha Campus, Digha Ghat, Patna

                                                .... .... Respondent/s
  ===========================================================
  Appearance :
  For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar
                         Mr. Bipin Kumar
  For the State:         Mr. Sanjay Kumar
  For the N.C.V.T.:      Mr. S. N. Pathak
  ===========================================================
  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
  ORAL JUDGMENTDate: 18-08-2015
                                       ***************

18.08.2015                  Heard learned counsel for the parties.Petitioner will have to apply for inspection

                before the newly created body, which has been saddled

                with the responsibility now for carrying out inspection and
     Patna High Court CWJC No.12643 of 2013 dt.18-08-20152/2making recommendation for final approval. If such an

                       application is made by following the procedure, which

                       may include deposit of certain fee etc., the authority

                       must carry out an inspection within a reasonable time-

                       frame, not beyond a period of three months to make its

                       recommendation for appropriate decision thereafter.Writ application stands disposed off with

                       above direction.(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
    SKM/-U