Rajasthan High CourtHardeep Singh Randhawa vs State Of Raj Asthan Through Pp And Anr on 9 May, 2011S.B.Criminal Misc. Application No. 79/2011
In
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 753 of 2011
   Hardeep Singh vs.  State of Raj .and anr. 
 
----
9.5.2011
  HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

Mr.Abhinav Sharma, for the  petitioner.
Mr.Pradeep Shrimal,   Public Prosecutor.Mr.Sharad Purohit, for the complainant---Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.           
        This misc. application has been filed for correction in the order passed by this court on 2.5.2011 in S.B.Cr. Misc. Petition No. 753 of 2011. It has been stated that at the time of passing of the order the Investigating Officer Prabhati Lal was present but his presence could not be marked in the order. In the order in para 2 in place of the word investigating officer words  investigating agency has been typed.  It has further been stated that the name of the counsel in para No.2 has been mentioned as Mr. Anurag Sharma but it should have been mentioned as Mr. Abhinav Sharma. I have gone through the contents of the application, the corrections as prayed in the application are necessary to be corrected.  The order dated 2.5.2011 after appropriate correction may be read as under :2.5.2011
  HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

Mr.Abhinav Sharma, for the  petitioner.Mr.Pradeep Shrimal,   Public Prosecutor.Along with Shri Prabhatilal, IO of the case present in person.Mr.Sharad Purohit, for the complainant---Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.           
        This misc. petition has been filed under-2-section 482Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR No.12/2011 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur  for offence   undersections 420,467,468,471and120 BIPC.After hearing both the sides and with the consent of the parties, I pass the following order :1)  The Investigating officer  of this case is directed  to investigate the matter in accordance with law.2)  Mr. Abhinav Sharma, learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has already submitted a representation to the investigating officer. The investigating officer is directed to investigate the matter in view of the contents of the representation.3)  The investigating officer is directed not to adopt the coercive steps against the accused petitioner but he is free to investigate the matter in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure code.Ordered accordingly. The misc. petition is disposed with the above directions. 
      The order dated 2.5.2011 passed in the S.B.Crl. Misc. Petition No. 753 of 2011 may be read as quoted above.(Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J.OPPareek/

All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/ order being emailed. 
    (O P Pareek)
     PS-cum JW